Abstract
Automation of work is not a new phenomenon. For businesses, technological development has an impact how enterprises organize work and production processes. Mechanical power has replaced some human workforces to eliminate unsafe work processes. New information and communication technologies have thus raised important questions as to what types of work can be replaced by technology and which require human decision-making and social and creative intelligence. This chapter discusses general developments in the automation of work and reflects on forecasts that have been made regarding changes in the labor market.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Autor, D. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30.
Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Chen, J. X. (2016). The evolution of computing: AlphaGo. Computing in Science & Engineering, 18(4), 4–7.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
Deming, D. J. (2015). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market, The National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 21473. Cambridge, MA: NBER. Retrieved from: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/ddeming/files/deming_socialskills_august2015.pdf.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285.
Frey, C.B., & Osborne, M.A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/future-of-employment.pdf
Frey, C.B., Osborne, M.A., & Holmes, G. (2016). Citi GPS: Global perspectives & solutions. Retrieved from https://www.citivelocity.com/citigps/ReportSeries.action?recordId=49
Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (1998). The origins of technology-skill complementarity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 693–732.
Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2007). The race between education and technology: The evolution of U.S. educational wage differentials, 1890 to 2005, NBER working paper series. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w12984.pdf.
Goos, M., & Manning, A. (2007). Lousy and lovely jobs: The rising polarization of work in Britain. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 118–133.
Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509–2526.
Hagel, J. (2016). We need to expand our definition of entrepreneurship. Retrieved from. https://hbr.org/2016/09/we-need-to-expand-our-definition-of-entrepreneurship
Hytönen, K., Palonen, T., Lehtinen, E., & Hakkarainen, K. (2016). Between two advisors: Interconnecting academic and workplace settings in an emerging field. Vocations and Learning, 9(3), 333–359.
IBM. (2016). Watson health. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/watson/health/
Kersting, N. B., Sherin, B. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2014). Automated scoring of teachers’ open-ended responses to video prompts: Bringing the classroom-video-analysis assessment to scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(6), 950–974.
Komulainen, K., Naskali, P., Korhonen, M., & Keskitalo–Foley, S. (2011). Internal entrepreneurship: A Trojan horse of the neoliberal governance of education? Finnish pre- and in-service teachers’ implementation of and resistance towards entrepreneurship education. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 9(1), 342–374.
Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B., & Cianchetti, M. (2016). Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Science Robotics, 1(1), 1–11. Retrieved from http://robotics.sciencemag.org/content/1/1/eaah3690/tab-pdf.
Liu, M.-C., & Huang, Y.-M. (2017). The use of data science for education: The case of social-emotional learning. Smart Learning Environments, 4(1), 1–13.
Nenkov, N., Dimitrov, G., Dyachenko, Y., & Koeva, K. (2016). Artificial intelligence technologies for personnel learning management systems. In R. Yager, V. Sgurev, M. Hadjiski, & V. Jotsov (Eds.), 2016 IEEE 8th international conference on intelligent systems (pp. 189–195). New York: IEEE. doi:10.1109/IS.2016.7737420.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.
Rintala, N., & Suolanen, S. (2005). The implications of digitalization for job descriptions, competencies and the quality of working life. Nordicom Review, 26(2), 53–67.
Rudner, L.M. (2009). Scoring and classifying examinees using measurement decision theory. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(8). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=14&n=8.
Spencer-Scarr, D. (2014). Long tail leadership: Understanding soft power affecting organizations. In H. Rahman & R. D. de Sousa (Eds.), Information systems and technology for organizational agility, intelligence, and resilience (pp. 1–24). Hershey: Business Science Reference.
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193.
World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Retrieved from. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf
Yeager, D. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Adolescents’ implicit theories predict desire for vengeance after peer conflicts: Correlational and experimental evidence. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1090–1107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nokelainen, P., Nevalainen, T., Niemi, K. (2018). Mind or Machine? Opportunities and Limits of Automation. In: Harteis, C. (eds) The Impact of Digitalization in the Workplace. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63256-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63257-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)