Skip to main content

Taming Living Logic Using Formal Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Models, Algorithms, Logics and Tools

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10460))

  • 1179 Accesses

Abstract

One of the goals of synthetic biology is to build genetic circuits to control the behavior of a cell for different application domains, such as medical, environmental, and biotech. During the design process of genetic circuits, biologists are often interested in the probability of a system to work under different conditions. Since genetic circuits are noisy and stochastic in nature, the verification process becomes very complicated. The state space of stochastic genetic circuit models is usually too large to be handled by classical model checking techniques. Therefore, the verification of genetic circuit models is usually performed by the statistical approach of model checking. In this work, we present a workflow for checking genetic circuit models using a stochastic model checker (Uppaal) and a stochastic simulator (D-VASim). We demonstrate with experimentations that the proposed workflow is not only sufficient for the model checking of genetic circuits, but can also be used to design the genetic circuits with desired timings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gardner, T.S., Cantor, C.R., Collins, J.J.: Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature 403, 339–342 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiss, R., Basu, S.: The device physics of cellular logic gates. In: The First Workshop on Non-Silicon Computing, pp. 54–61 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elowitz, M.B., Leibler, S.: A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403, 335–338 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, J.C., et al.: Environmentally controlled invasion of cancer cells by engineering bacteria. J. Mol. Biol. 355, 619–627 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atsumi, S., Liao, J.C.: Metabolic engineering for advanced biofuels production from Escherichia coli. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 19(5), 414–419 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cases, I., De Lorenzo, V.: Genetically modified organisms for the environment: stories of success and failure and what we have learned from them. Int. Microbiol. 8, 213–222 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ro, D.-K., et al.: Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature 440, 940–943 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McAdams, H.H., Shapiro, L.: Circuit simulation of genetic networks. Science 269, 650–656 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartley, B., et al.: Synthetic biology open language (SBOL) version 2.0.0. J. Integr. Bioinform. 12(2) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ellis, T., et al.: Diversity-based, model-guided construction of synthetic gene networks with predicted functions. Nat. Biotech. 27, 465–471 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sydney, R., et al.: Programming gene expression with combinatorial promoters. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 145 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Canton, B., et al.: Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices. Nat. Biotech. 26, 788–793 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaern, M., et al.: The engineering of genetic regulatory networks. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 5, 179–206 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Knight, T.: Idempotent vector design for standard assembly of biobricks. MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (2003). http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/21168

  15. Salis, H.M., Mirsky, E.A., Voigt, C.A.: Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 946–950 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mutalik, V.K., et al.: Precise and reliable gene expression via standard transcription and translation initiation elements. Nat. Methods 10, 354–360 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cambray, G., et al.: Measurement and modeling of intrinsic transcription terminators. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 5139–5148 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodrigo, G., Jaramillo, A.: AutoBioCAD: Full biodesign automation of genetic circuits. ACS Synth. Biol. 2, 230–236 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krig, D., Weiss, R.: Signal-amplifying genetic circuit enables in vivo observation of weak promoter activation in the Rhl quorum sensing system. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 89(6), 709–718 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nistala, G.J., et al.: A modular positive feedback-based gene amplifier. J. Biol. Eng. 4(1), 4 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nevozhay, D., et al.: Negative autoregulation linearizes the dose-response and supresses the heterogeneity of gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(13), 5123–5128 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ajo-Franklin, C.M., et al.: Rational design of memory in eukaryotic cells. Genes Dev. 21(18), 2271–2276 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fritz, G., Buchler, N., Hwa, T., Gerland, U.: Designing sequential transcription logic: a simple genetic circuit for conditional memory. Syst. Synth. Biol. 1, 89–98 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cherry, J.L., Adler, F.R.: How to make a biological switch. J. Theor. Biol. 203(2), 117–133 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weber, W., et al.: A genetic time-delay circuitry in mammalian cell. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 98(4), 894–902 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bashor, C.J., et al.: Using engineered scaffold interactions to reshape MAP kinase pathway signalling dynamics. Science 319(5869), 1539–1543 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guet, C.C., Elowitz, M.B., Hsing, W., Leibler, S.: Combinatorial synthesis of genetic networks. Science 296, 1466–1470 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dueber, J.E., Yeh, B.J., Chak, K.: LimWA: reprogramming control of an allosteric signaling switch through modular recombination. Science 301, 1904–1908 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson, J.C., Voigt, C.A., Arkin, A.P.: Environmental signal integration by a modular AND gate. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 133 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Win, M.N., Smolke, C.D.: Higher-order cellular information processing with synthetic RNA devices. Science 322, 456–460 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. MacDonald, J.T., Barnes, C., Kitney, R.I., Freemont, P.S., Stan, G.-B.V.: Computational design approaches and tools for synthetic biology. Integr. Biol. 3, 97–108 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chandran, D., Bergmann, F.T., Sauro, H.M., Densmore, D.: Computer-aided design for synthetic biology. In: Koeppl, H., Setti, G., di Bernardo, M., Densmore, D. (eds.) Design and Analysis of Biomolecular Circuits, pp. 203–224. Springer, New York (2011). doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6766-4_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Beal, J., Lu, T., Weiss, R.: Automatic compilation from high-level biologically-oriented programming language to genetic regulatory networks. PLoS ONE 6, e22490 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. http://sbml.org/SBML_Software_Guide/SBML_Software_Matrix

  35. Funahashi, A., et al.: Cell designer 3.5: a versatile modeling tool for biochemical networks. Proc. IEEE 96, 1254–1265 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Myers, C.J., et al.: iBioSim: a tool for the analysis and design of genetic circuits. Bioinformatics 25, 2848–2849 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nielsen, A.A., et al.: Genetic circuit design automation. Science, 352(6281) 2016

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stefan, H., et al.: COPASI – a COmplex PAthway SImulator. Bioinformatics 22, 3067–3074 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Baig, H., Madsen, J.: D-VASim – an interactive virtual laboratory environment for the simulation and analysis of genetic circuits. Bioinformatics 32(20), 1–3 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Baig, H., Madsen, J.: Logic and timing analysis of genetic logic circuits using D-VASim. In: 8th IWBDA 2016, pp. 77–78 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bengtsson, J., Larsen, K., Larsson, F., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: UPPAAL — a tool suite for automatic verification of real-time systems. In: Alur, R., Henzinger, Thomas A., Sontag, E.D. (eds.) HS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1066, pp. 232–243. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). doi:10.1007/BFb0020949

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Bulychev, P., David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikučionis, M., Poulsen, D.B.: Checking and Distributing Statistical Model Checking. In: Goodloe, A.E., Person, S. (eds.) NFM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7226, pp. 449–463. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28891-3_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Jha, S.K., Clarke, E.M., Langmead, C.J., Legay, A., Platzer, A., Zuliani, P.: A Bayesian approach to model checking biological systems. In: Degano, P., Gorrieri, R. (eds.) CMSB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5688, pp. 218–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03845-7_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Clarke, E.M., Faeder, J.R., Langmead, C.J., Harris, L.A., Jha, S.K., Legay, A.: Statistical model checking in BioLab: applications to the automated analysis of T-Cell receptor signaling pathway. In: Heiner, M., Uhrmacher, Adelinde M. (eds.) CMSB 2008. LNCS, vol. 5307, pp. 231–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88562-7_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Calder, M., Gilmore, S., Hillston, J.: Modelling the influence of RKIP on the ERK signaling pathway using the stochastic process algebra PEPA. Trans. Comput. Syst. Biol. VII 4230, 1–23 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Calder, M., Vyshemirsky, V., Gilbert, D., Orton, R.: Analysis of signaling pathways using the PRISM model checker. In: Proceedings of Computational Methods in Systems Biology (CMSB), pp. 179–190 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cardelli, L.: Abstract machines of systems biology. In: Priami, C., Merelli, E., Gonzalez, P., Omicini, A. (eds.) Transactions on Computational Systems Biology III. LNCS, vol. 3737, pp. 145–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11599128_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Fisher, J., Piterman, N., Hubbard, E.J., Stern, M.J., Harel, D.: Computational insights into caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(6), 1951–1956 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Calzone, L., Chabrier-Rivier, N., Fages, F., Soliman, S.: Machine learning biochemical networks from temporal logic properties. In: Priami, C., Plotkin, G. (eds.) Transactions on Computational Systems Biology VI. LNCS, vol. 4220, pp. 68–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11880646_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Chabrier, N., Fages, F.: Symbolic model checking of biochemical networks. In: Priami, C. (ed.) CMSB 2003. LNCS, vol. 2602, pp. 149–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi:10.1007/3-540-36481-1_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Kwiatkowska, M., Norman, G., Parker, D., Tymchyshyn, O., Heath, J., Gaffney, E.: Simulation and verification for computational modelling of signaling pathways. In: WSC 2006: Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Winter simulation, pp. 1666–1674 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Langmead, C.J., Jha, S.K.: Predicting Protein Folding Kinetics Via Temporal Logic Model Checking. In: Giancarlo, R., Hannenhalli, S. (eds.) WABI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4645, pp. 252–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74126-8_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Langmead, C., Jha, S.K.: Symbolic approaches to finding control strategies in boolean networks. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Conference, (APBC), pp. 307–319 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  54. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): Language Specification for Level 3 Version 1 Core, 06 October 2010

    Google Scholar 

  55. Myers, C.J.: Engineering Genetic Circuits. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Marius Mikucionis (Aalborg University) for providing us an extensive support and help on using Uppaal. We would further like to thank Prof. Chris Myers (University of Utah) for providing us the SBML models of the genetic circuits, and Associate Prof. Michael Reichhardt Hansen (Technical University of Denmark) for fruitful discussions on model checking and for giving constructive feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Madsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baig, H., Madsen, J. (2017). Taming Living Logic Using Formal Methods. In: Aceto, L., Bacci, G., Bacci, G., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Legay, A., Mardare, R. (eds) Models, Algorithms, Logics and Tools. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10460. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63121-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63121-9_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63120-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63121-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics