Skip to main content

Responsibilization and MNC–Stakeholder Engagement: Who Engages Whom in the Pharmaceutical Industry?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stakeholder Engagement: Clinical Research Cases

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 46))

Abstract

Within the context of the pharmaceutical industry, there are numerous controversial issues that have still not received satisfactory answers. In this era of neo-liberal capitalism, ‘responsibilizing’ every stakeholder announces the freedom of the MNCs from regulations and productive stakeholder engagement for enacting sincere corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices. More prominently, as the current level of global health inequalities demonstrates, the twenty-first century stakeholders of the firm are for the most part on their own, although this remains an implicit design in CSR discourses. This reasoning stems from the fact that unlike the proximate and influential stakeholders, these distal and fragile stakeholders remain faceless, invisible and nameless, given their lower socio-economic and political status. Pharmaceutical MNC–stakeholder controversies are not new, but the legitimating tactics of the firm obscure the material needs of stakeholders—especially those of the marginalized and distal stakeholders in emerging economies. The managerial and strategic recipes for stakeholder engagement are manifold, and yet a lot remains to be understood about who engages whom in responsibly creating the maximum social value (health benefits). This is the research question this study seeks to answer. Employing an inductive approach, I use ‘Big Pharma’ as a case that bases arguments on extant literature as ‘authorities of prima facie evidence’ to outline the industry-specific questions whilst questioning the existing answers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abraham, John. 2002. The pharmaceutical industry as a political player. The Lancet 360: 1498–1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahen, Frederick. 2015. Strategic corporate responsibility orientation for sustainable global health governance: Pharmaceutical value co-protection in transitioning economies. Doctoral thesis. Turku, Finland: University of Turku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell, Marcia. 2004. Excess in the pharmaceutical industry. Canadian Medical Association Journal 171: 1451–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autto, Hannu. 2014. Collective action in commons: Its diverse ends and consequences. Doctoral thesis. Turku, Finland: University of Turku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasegaram, Manica. 2014. Medicine is just for those who can afford it: Why don't pharmaceutical companies develop drugs for the poor? AlJazeera.com, 14 Mar 2014. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/03/medicine-just-those-who-can-aff-201431181911299288.html. Accessed 16 May 2014.

  • Banerjee, Subhabrata B. 2007. Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Voices of the Governed: Towards a theory of the translocal. Organization 18 (3): 323–344. doi:10.1177/1350508411398729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. A critical perspective on corporate social responsibility: Towards a global governance framework. Critical Perspectives on International Business 10: 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Kirsty. 2007. New counterfeit report highlights worrying trends. Outsourcing-Pharma. com, 7 Nov 2007. http://www.outsourcing-pharma.com/Contract-Manufacturing/New-counterfeit-report-highlights-worrying-trends. Accessed 12 Apr 2009.

  • Bates, Robert H., Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry R. Weingast. 1998. Analytic narratives. Princeton\NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. The Analytical Narrative Project. American Political Science Review 94 (3): 696–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC. 2013. GlaxoSmithKline launches Africa charity partnership. BBC News, 10 May 2013. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22476556. Accessed 11 May 2013.

  • Bitektine, Alex. 2011. Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review 36: 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, and Eve Chiapello. 2006. The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougrine, Hassan. 2006. Oil: Profits of the chain keepers. International Journal of Political Economy 35: 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, Howard R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, Cliff, and Veronique Ambrosini. 2000. Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management 11: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John, and Peter Drahos. 2000. Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruche, Gert. 2011. Emerging challengers in knowledge-based industries? The case of Indian pharmaceutical multinationals, Columbia FDI Perspectives. New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buabeng, Kwame O. 2010. The role of the pharmaceutical sector in malaria control in Ghana. Kuopio: University of Eastern Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, Paul F., and Glenn M. McEvoy. 2000. Creating and sustaining ethical capability in the multi-national corporation. Journal of World Business 34: 326–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John L. 2006. Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist 49: 925–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 32: 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Archie B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4: 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34: 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellucci, Fabrizio, and Gokhan Ertug. 2010. What’s in it for them? Advantages of higher-status partners in exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal 53: 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, Max B.E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20: 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Class, James N. 2012. Emerging markets and differential pricing policies: A question of global health? Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 18: 40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. 1988. The firm, the market, and the law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Countess of Frederiksborg, Alexandra, and Timothy L. Fort. 2014. The paradox of pharmaceutical CSR: The sincerity nexus. Business Horizons 57: 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Keith. 1960. Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review 2: 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R. 2010. Reclaiming marginalized stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics 111: 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vogli, Roberto, Anne Kouvonen, and David Gimeno. 2014. The influence of market deregulation on fast food consumption and body mass index: A cross-national time series analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 92: 99–107A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMasi, Joseph A., Ronald W. Hansen, Henry G. Grabowski, and Louis Lasagna. 1991. Cost of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Health Economics 10: 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas, and Lee E. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20: 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durepos, Gabrielle, Ajnesh Prasad, and Cristian E. Villanueva. 2016. How might we study international business to account for marginalized subjects?: Turning to practice and situating knowledges. Critical Perspectives on International Business 12 (3): 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elms, Heather, Shawn Berman, and Andrew C. Wicks. 2002. Ethics and incentives: An evaluation and development of stakeholder theory in the health care industry. Business Ethics Quarterly 12: 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, Ezekiel J., David Wendler, and Christine Grady. 2000. What makes clinical research ethical? Journal of the American Medical Association 283: 2701–2711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, Ezekiel J., David Wendler, Jack Killen, and Christine Grady. 2004. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. Journal of Infectious Diseases 189: 930–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, Peter, John Roberts, and Christina Garsten. 2013. In search of corporate social responsibility: Introduction to special issue. Organization 20: 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, William C. 1960. The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review 2: 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Moving to CSR4: What to pack for the trip. Business and Society 37: 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Ethical leadership and creating value for stakeholders. In Business ethics: New challenges for business schools and corporate leaders, ed. Robert A. Peterson and O.C. Ferrell, 82–97. Armonk\New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. Edward, and S. Ramakrishna Velamuri. 2006. A new approach to CSR: Company stakeholder responsibility. In Corporate social responsibility: Reconciling aspiration with application, ed. Kakabadse Andrew and Morsing Mette, 9–23. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, The New York Times Magazine. New York: The New York Times Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, Jeff. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review 24: 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, John A., and Jerry Goodstein. 2002. Fulfilling institutional responsibilities in health care. Business Ethics Quarterly 12: 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella, Alfonso. 1995. Science and innovation: The US pharmaceutical industry during the 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gehrke, Mirjam. 2012. Pharmaceutical industry neglects developing countries. DW.DE, 26 Oct 2012. http://www.dw.de/pharmaceutical-industry-neglects-developing-countries/a-16331939. Accessed 20 May 2014.

  • Ghauri, Pervez N., and Peter J. Buckley. 2002. Globalization and the end of competition: A critical review of rent-seeking multinationals. In Critical perspectives on internationalization, ed. Virpi Havila, Mats Forsgren, and Håkan Håkansson, 7–28. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldacre, Ben. 2012. Bad pharma: How drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond, Jean-Pascal, Nahee Kang, and Jeremy Moon. 2011. The government of self-regulation: On the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society 40: 640–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A., and David W. Soskice. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, Bernd. 2010. The study of futures, and the analysis of power. Futures 42: 1007–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, Gerard, and Peter Fleming. 2009. Updating the critical perspective on corporate social responsibility. Sociology Compass 3: 937–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansén, Sten-Olof. 1982. Studies in internationalisation of the pharmaceuticals industry – A taxonomic approach. Doctoral thesis. Turku, Finland: Åbo Akademi University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Jared D., and R. Edward Freeman. 2008. The impossibility of the separation thesis: A response to Joakim Sandberg. Business Ethics Quarterly 18: 541–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, Raine, Martti Kulvik, and Pekka Ylä-Anttila. 2005. International mega-trends and growth prospects of the Finnish biotechnology industry: Recent economic research and policy implications. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 11: 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Peter S. 2011. Understanding global health governance as a complex adaptive system. Global Public Health 6: 593–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, Bernardo A., Christoph H. Loch, and Ayse Önçüler. 2004. Status as a valued resource. Social Psychology Quarterly 67: 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, Stephen H. 1960/1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ietto-Gillies, Grazia. 2002. Hymer, the nation-state and the determinants of multinational corporations’ activities. Contributions to Political Economy 21: 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMS-Health. 2012. Africa: A ripe opportunity. Understanding the pharmaceutical market opportunity and developing sustainable business models in Africa. http://www.imshealth.com/ims/Global/Content/Insights/Featured%20Topics/Emerging%20Markets/IMS_Africa_Opportunity_Whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2013.

  • Jain, Sachin H., Rebecca Weintraub, Joseph Rhatigan, Michael E. Porter, and Jim Y. Kim. 2008. Delivering global health. Student British Medical Journal 16: 227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, Lisa M. 2009. Filling drug gaps. Chemical and Engineering News 87 (3): 38–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsikas, Dimitrios. 2011. Technical requirements for the registration of pharmaceutical products. In Handbook of transnational governance: Institutions & Innovations, ed. Thomas Hale and David Held, 88–94. Cambridge/Maiden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelesidis, Theodore, Iosif Kelesidis, Petros I. Rafailidis, and Matthew E. Falagas. 2007. Counterfeit or substandard antimicrobial drugs: A review of the scientific evidence. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 60: 214–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jim Y., Joseph Rhatigan, Sachin H. Jain, Rebecca Weintraub, and Michael E. Porter. 2010. From a declaration of values to the creation of value in global health: A report from Harvard University’s Global Health Delivery Project. Global Public Health 5: 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, Robert V., and Jay M. Handelman. 2004. Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research 31: 691–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krech, Rüdiger. 2012. Working on the social determinants of health is central to public health. Journal of Public Health Policy 33: 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lartey, Paul A., and Alexandra, Graham. 2007. Health is wealth: Challenges of financing a state of the art pharmaceutical project in Africa. Corporate Africa Health Conference 2007 (Accra, Ghana), 15–16 April 2007. http://www.lagraychem.com/docs/knowl_article_gbc1.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2009.

  • Macdonald, Gareth. 2011a. UNCTAD to discuss fostering drug manufacturing in Africa. in-Pharma Technologist.com, 21 Mar 2011. http://www.in-pharmatechnologist.com/Regulatory-Safety/UNCTAD-to-discuss-fostering-drug-manufacturing-in-Africa. Accessed 30 May 2012.

  • ———. 2011b. UNIDO and AUC says big pharma can support drugmaking in Africa through partnering. in-Pharma Technologist.com, 12 Oct 2011. http://www.in-pharmatechnologist.com/Regulatory-Safety/UNIDO-and-AUC-says-Big-Pharma-can-support-drugmaking-in-Africa-through-partnering. Accessed 30 May 2012.

  • Mackey, Tim K., and Bryan A. Liang. 2011. The global counterfeit drug trade: patient safety and public health risks. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 100: 4571–4579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Globalization, evolution and emergence of direct-to-consumer advertising: Are emerging markets the next pharmaceutical marketing frontier. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 18: 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Pharmaceutical digital marketing and governance: Illicit actors and challenges to global patient safety and public health. Globalization and Health 9: 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, Ian. 2002. Priceless goods: How should life-saving drugs be priced? Business Ethics Quarterly: 451–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantere, Saku, Kalle Pajunen, and Juha-Antti Lamberg. 2009. Vices and virtues of corporate political activity: The challenge of international business. Business and Society 48: 105–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, Tim. 1997. Social research: Issues, methods and research. 2nd ed. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVea, John F., and R. Edward Freeman. 2005. A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management: How focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of Management Inquiry 14: 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Ronald K., Bradley R. Agle, and Donna J. Wood. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22: 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSF, Médecins Sans Frontières. 2001. Fatal imbalance: The crisis in research and development for drugs for neglected diseases. Geneva, Access to Essential Medicines Campaign and Drugs for Neglected Diseases Working Group; Médecins Sans Frontières.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, Rick. 2009. Stateside surge in pharma chemicals, Chemical and Engineering News 87 (39):38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myslinski Tipton, Martha, Sundar G. Bharadwaj, and Diana C. Robertson. 2009. Regulatory exposure of deceptive marketing and its impact on firm value. Journal of Marketing 73: 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Alexander Sascha K. 2009. Ethical corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the pharmaceutical industry: A happy couple? Journal of Medical Marketing: Device, Diagnostic and Pharmaceutical Marketing 9: 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwaka, Solomon, and Robert G. Ridley. 2003. Virtual drug discovery and development for neglected diseases through public–private partnerships. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2: 919–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, Stephen P., ed. 2000. Public-private partnerships: Theory and practice in international perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterath, Brigitte. 2014. The drug divide: Concerns grow in the US over generics produced in India. DW.DE, 23 Mar 2014. http://www.dw.de/the-drug-divide-concerns-grow-in-the-us-over-generics-produced-in-india/a-17507784. Accessed 29 May 2014.

  • Osuji, Onyeka K., and Okechukwu T. Umahi. 2012. Pharmaceutical companies and access to medicines–social integration and ethical CSR resolution of a global public choice problem. Journal of Global Ethics 8: 139–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, Guido, and Andreas Georg Scherer. 2006. Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics 66: 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Stephanie S., and Mitchell H. Grayson. 2008. Clinical research: Protection of the “vulnerable”? Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 121: 1103–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, Adrian, David Ballantyne, and Martin Christopher. 2005. A stakeholder approach to relationship marketing strategy: The development and use of the “six markets” model. European Journal of Marketing 39: 855–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, Gary P. 2006. The science business: The promise, the reality, and the future of biotech. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E., and Elizabeth O. Teisberg. 2006. Redefining health care: Creating value-based competition on results. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, James E., Lee E. Preston, and Sybille Sachs. 2002. Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review 45: 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, Ajnesh, and Gabrielle Durepos. 2016. From margin to center: Listening to silenced subjectivities in international business. Critical Perspectives on International Business 12 (3): 218–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Citizen. 2001. Rx R&D myths: The case against the drug industry’s R&D “scare card”. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch July 2001. http://www.citizen.org/documents/ACFDC.PDF. Accessed 11 Jun 2014.

  • Radin, Margaret. 1997. Contested commodities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, Suzana. 2013. Understanding the environments of emerging markets: the social costs of institutional voids. http://www.erim.eur.nl/news/detail/3160-farewell-address-understanding-the-environments-of-emerging-markets/#sthash.uDL2vctV.dpuf. Accessed 12 Oct 2013.

  • Ruggie, John G. 1982. International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization 36: 379–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoro, Michael A., and Thomas M. Gorrie. 2005. Ethics and the pharmaceutical industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia. 1996. Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Andreas G., and Guido Palazzo. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review 32: 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, Irene, and Francis Weyzig. 2008. Ethics for drug testing in low and middle income countries: Considerations for European market authorisation. Amsterdam: Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen (SOMO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonveld, Ed. 2015. The price of global health: drug pricing strategies to balance patient access and the funding of innovation. Second ed. Burlington: Gower Publishing, Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrecker, Ted. 2012. Multiple crises and global health: New and necessary frontiers of health politics. Global Public Health 7: 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senthilingam, Meera. 2015. How paradise became the fattest place in the world. CNN.com, 1 May 2015. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/05/01/health/pacific-islands-obesity/. Accessed 1 May 2015.

  • Shah, Anup. 2010. Pharmaceutical corporations and medical research. Global Issues, 2 Oct.. http://www.globalissues.org/article/52/pharmaceutical-corporations-and-medical-research. Accessed 29 Jun 2013.

  • Shamir, Ronen. 2004. The de-radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology 30: 669–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The age of responsibilization: on market-embedded morality. Economy and Society 37: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, Marv. 2010. Beef up international cooperation on counterfeits. Nature Medicine 16: 366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Bright. 2013. mPedigree: An African blueprint for consumer empowerment. This Is Africa, 15 Jan 2013. http://www.thisisafricaonline.com/Perspectives/mPedigree-An-African-blueprint-for-consumer-empowerment. Accessed 14 Dec 2013.

  • Sklair, Leslie. 2002. Globalization: Capitalism and its alternatives. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Alan D. 2008. Corporate social responsibility practices in the pharmaceutical industry. Business Strategy Series 9: 306–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Brian D. 2013. Fitness first: How Pharma can get in shape for the future. PMLiVE.com . http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/fitness_first_how_pharma_can_get_in_shape_for_the_future_465508. Accessed 10 May 2013.

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2006. Making globalization work. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Arjun Jayadev. 2010. Medicine for tomorrow: Some alternative proposals to promote socially beneficial research and development in pharmaceuticals. Journal of Generic Medicines 7: 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1996. The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Mark C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20: 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thye, Shane R. 2000. A status value theory of power in exchange relations. American Sociological Review 65: 407–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood Stephens, Carroll, and Anthony T. Cobb. 1999. A Habermasian approach to justice in organizational change: Synthesizing the technical and philosophical perspectives. Journal of Organizational Change Management 12: 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard. 2007. Business systems and organizational capabilities: the institutional structuring of competitive competences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Morton. 2002. NGO strategies for promoting corporate social responsibility. Ethics and International Affairs 16: 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, David. 2005. The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Alice, Paul E. Farmer, and Anita M. McGahan. 2010. ‘Sustainability’ in global health. Global Public Health 5: 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, Simon. 2001. The civil corporation: The new economy of corporate citizenship. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick Ahen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahen, F. (2017). Responsibilization and MNC–Stakeholder Engagement: Who Engages Whom in the Pharmaceutical Industry?. In: Freeman, R., Kujala, J., Sachs, S. (eds) Stakeholder Engagement: Clinical Research Cases. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62785-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics