Abstract
While the debate over same-sex marriage has raged in both congresses, same-sex marriage was legalized by the Brazilian Supreme Court and not the Chilean Supreme Court. The chapter opens with an overview of LGBT mobilization in the two countries, demonstrating that this does not help explain policy stasis. We then study institutional variables. Both congresses contain influential conservative voting blocs, which makes passing progressive legislation challenging. Same-sex marriage was ultimately successful in Brazil through the judiciary, an avenue unavailable in Chile. Historical institutionalism demonstrates that a federalist structure was essential for same-sex marriage in Brazil, while the unitary composition of Chile provides fewer policy avenues for LGBT rights. Using Political Opportunity Structure, we then demonstrate how the judicialization of LGBT rights in Brazil led to success for same-sex marriage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aninat, Cristóbal, John Londregan, Patricio Navia, and JoaquÃn Vial. 2008. Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes in Chile. In Policymaking in Latin America: How Politics Shapes Policies, ed. Ernesto Stein and Mariano Tommasi. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
Blofield, Merike. 2006. The Politics of Moral Sin: Abortion and Divorce in Spain, Chile, and Argentina. San Diego: University of California.
Carey, J.M. 2002. Parties, Coalitions, and the Chilean Congress in the 1990s. In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. S. Morgenstern and B. Nacif. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrara, Sergio. 2012. Discriminação, polÃticas e direitos sexuias no Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pùblica 28 (1). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2012000100020.
Contardo, Oscar. 2011. Raro: Una Historia gay de Chile. Santiago: Editorial Planeta.
Corrales, Javier. 2015. The Politics of LGBT Rights and the Caribbean: Research Agendas. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 100: 53–62.
Couso, Javier A. 2005. The Judicialization of Chilean Politics: The Rights Revolution That Never Was. In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, ed. Rachel Sieder, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell, 105–131. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dawn King, M. 2013. The Role of Societal Attitudes and Activists’ Perceptions on Effective Judicial Access for the LGBT Movement in Chile. Interface 5 (1): 183–203.
De la Dehesa, Rafael. 2010. Queering the Public Sphere in Mexico and Brazil: Sexual Rights Movements in Emerging Democracies. Durham: Duke University Press.
DÃez, Jordi. 2015. The Politics of Gay Marriage in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Encarnación, Omar. 2016. Out in the Periphery: Latin America’s Gay Rights Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Espinosa, G. 2004. The Pentecostalization of Latin America and U.S. Latino Christianity. The Journal of the Society for Pentecostal Studies 26 (2): 270–271.
Frasca, Tim. 2010. Chile: Seizing Empowerment. In Politics of Sexuality in Latin America, ed. Javier Corrales and Mario Pecheny. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Gamson, William, and Stephen Meyer. 1996. Framing Political Opportunity. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, ed. Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gauri, Varun, and Daniel M. Brinks. 2008. Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goméz, Eduardo. 2010. Friendly Government, Cruel Society: AIDS and the Politics of Homosexual Strategic Mobilization in Brazil. In The Politics of Sexuality in Latin America, ed. J. Corrales and M. Pecheny, 233–250. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Green, James. 1999. Beyond Carnival: Male Homosexuality in Twentieth Century Brazil. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keck, Margaret. 1995. Democratization and the Workers Party in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press.
King, Desmond. 1995. Actively Seeking Work: The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare Policy in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marsiaj, Juan. 2006. Social Movements and Political Parties: Gays, Lesbians and Travestis and the Struggle for Inclusion in Brazil. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 31 (62): 167–196.
———. 2008. Social Movements and Political Parties: Gays, Lesbians, and Travestis. In The Politics of Sexuality in Latin America, ed. J. Corrales and M. Pecheny, 197–212. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
———. 2012. Federalism, Advocacy Networks, and Sexual Diversity Politics in Brazil. In Comparative Public Policy in Latin America, ed. Jordi DÃez and Susan Franceschet, 126–149. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Ogland, Curtis. 2014. Religion and the Rainbow Struggle: Does Religion Factor into Attitudes Toward Homosexuality and Same-Sex Civil Unions in Brazil? Journal of Homosexuality 61 (9): 1334–1349.
Olavarria-Gambi, Mauricio. 2016. Agenda and Public Policy: Evidence From Chile. International Journal of Public Administration 39 (2): 157–172.
Oro, A.P. 2003. A PolÃtica da Igreja Universal e Seus Reflexos Nos Campos Religioso e Politico Brasileiros. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 18 (53): 579–607.
Pierson, Paul, and Theda Skocpol. 2002. Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science. In The State of the Discipline, ed. Ira Katzenelson and Helen Milner, 693–792. New York: Norton.
Reich, Gary, and Pedro dos Santos. 2013. The Rise (and Frequent Fall) of Evangelical Politicians: Organization, Theology and Church Politics. Latin American Politics and Society 55 (4): 1–22.
Siavelis, Peter M. 2002. Exaggerated Presidentialism and Moderate President’s: Executive-Legislative Relations in Chile. In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Bentio Nacif. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 1985. Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research. In Bringing the State Back in, ed. Theda Skocpol, Peter B. Evans, and Dietrich Rueschmemeyer, 3–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 2017. State Formation and Social Policy in the United States. American Behavioral Scientist 35 (4–5): 559–584.
Smulovitz, Catalina. 2012. Public Policy by Other Means: Playing the Judicial Arena. In Comparative Public Policy in Latin America, ed. Jordi DÃez and Susan Franceschet, 105–125. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Waring, Daniel. 2017. A Question of Priorities: Variance in LGBT Protections in Anti-discrimination Legislation in Argentina and Chile. MA thesis, University of Guelph.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Valiquette, T., Waring, D. (2018). A Tale of Two Congresses: Sex, Institutions, and Evangelicals in Brazil and Chile. In: Winter, B., Forest, M., Sénac, R. (eds) Global Perspectives on Same-Sex Marriage. Global Queer Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62764-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62764-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62763-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62764-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)