Skip to main content

Gender and Peace Negotiations: Why Gendering Peace Negotiations Multiplies Opportunities for Reconciliation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking

Abstract

Research, as well as fieldwork observation, has long established the multiple intersections between gender and conflicts. How masculinities and femininities are constructed in times of conflict and war, how gender and ethnicity are used in narratives and political discourses, how gender roles, militarism and war are tightly interrelated, and more generally how conflict impacts differently on women and on men, or how the meanings of conflict and security might diverge for women and men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Security Council Resolution 1325 was adopted unanimously on 31 October 2000. It addresses the impact of war on women, as well as the role women should and do play in conflict management, conflict resolution, and peace building.

  2. 2.

    This is not to say, of course, that sexual violence does not happen in peacetime as well, but that it has been shown to be used as a tactic of subjugation and ethnic cleansing by some conflict actors.

  3. 3.

    http://www.unifem.org/gender_issues/women_war_peace/facts_figures.html? Checked on 30 July 2013.

  4. 4.

    UN Report of the Secretary-General on women and peace and security, 23 September 2014: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/2014/693 (Accessed March 23, 2015).

  5. 5.

    Quoted by Catherine Mabobori, one of the women’s representatives during the negotiations over the conflict in Burundi, Seminar held at the Université Lumière de Bujumbura, Burundi, 28 April 2012.

  6. 6.

    For instance, it has been shown that men and women are often involved in peace activities in different ways, and that the ways they perceive their security needs differ (see for instance Hoogensen and Rottem 2004, or Pankhurst 2008).

  7. 7.

    Quoted by Catherine Mabobori, Seminar held at the Université Lumière de Bujumbura, Burundi, 28 April 2012.

  8. 8.

    http://www.un.org/wcm/content/site/undpa/main/issues/sexual_violence (Accessed 23 March 2015).

  9. 9.

    Catherine Mabobori, Seminar held at the Université Lumière de Bujumbura, Burundi, 28 April 2012.

  10. 10.

    This “corridor lobbying” has been successfully used in many other settings, such as in Liberia, as described by Anderlini: “The Liberians perfected the art of “corridor lobbying”, literally waiting in corridors talking to negotiators as they entered and exited the room during breaks in the 1994 Accra conference” (Anderlini 2007: 63).

  11. 11.

    Quoted by Catherine Mabobori, Seminar held at the Université Lumière de Bujumbura, Burundi, 28 April 2012. Interestingly, this comment generated such an uproar that the man who had made it had to apologize a while later.

  12. 12.

    First with the Peace People of Mairéad Corrigan and Betty Williams, who were granted the Nobel Peace Prize in 1976, and then with the Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition that took part in the negotiations that led to the 1998 Peace Agreements.

  13. 13.

    Personal correspondence with various women who have participated in peace negotiations in Burundi and in DRC.

  14. 14.

    Catherine Mabobori has for instance been targeted by a defamatory campaign, during which leaflets attacking her morality were distributed in her neighbourhood, and even in her own mailbox (Catherine Mabobori, Seminar held at the Université Lumière de Bujumbura, Burundi, 28 April 2012).

References

  • Anderlini, S.N. 2007. Women building peace, what they do, why it matters. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C., and C. O’Rourke. 2010. Peace agreements or piece of paper? The impact of the UNSC resolution 1325 on peace processes and their agreements. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59 (4): 941–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, M.A., B. Urlacher, N.F. Hudson, A. Niv-Solomon, L.L. Janik, M.J. Butler, S.W. Brown, and A. Joannou. 2009. Gender and negotiation: Some experimental findings from an international negotiation simulation. International Studies Quarterly 53 (1): 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W., and J.W. Messerschmidt. 2005. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society 19 (6): 829–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogensen, G., and S.V. Rottem. 2004. Gender identity and the subject of security. Security Dialogue 35: 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R., and A. Goetz. 2010. Addressing sexual violence in internationally mediated peace negotiations. International Peacekeeping 17 (2): 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb D.M., and G.G. Coolidge. 1991. Her place at the table: A consideration of gender issues in negotiation. In Negotiation theory and practice, eds. J.W. Breslin and J.Z. Rubin, 261–277. Cambridge, MA: Program on Negotiation, Harvard Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, I. 2009. The women and peace hypothesis? The effect of opponent negotiators’ gender on the evaluation of the compromise solutions in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. International Negotiation 14: 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazurana D., A. Raven-Roberts, and J. Parpart (eds.). 2005. Gender, conflict and peacekeeping. Lanham and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst, D. (ed.). 2008. Gendered peace, womens struggles for post-war justice and reconciliation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, A. 2008. Gender sensitivity: Nicety or necessity in peace-process management? Oslo Forum of Mediators.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNWOMEN. 2012. Women’s participation in peace negotiations: Connections between presence and influence, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman I.W., and V. Kremenyuk (eds.). 2005. Peace versus justice, Negotiating forward- and backward-looking outcomes. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Élise Féron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Féron, É. (2017). Gender and Peace Negotiations: Why Gendering Peace Negotiations Multiplies Opportunities for Reconciliation. In: Rosoux, V., Anstey, M. (eds) Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62674-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62674-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62673-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62674-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics