Skip to main content

Barriers to Leaving an Abusive Relationship

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Interpersonal Violence and Abuse Across the Lifespan

Abstract

Professionals and the public alike are puzzled by the seemingly irrational behavior of those who stay in abusive relationships. The most common question about intimate partner violence seems to be: “Why does she stay?” This chapter will present the latest research to shed light on the common barriers that make it difficult to leave an abusive relationship. It will address the process of leaving and the counter-intuitive reasons some return to these relationships. Studies reveal that leaving is typically not a single, sudden event, but rather a slow process through several stages.

Key variables are organized by levels of the ecological framework. The main variables are clustered in three areas: (1) material resources, (2) psychological forces, and (3) social structural factors. The latter include the way in which formal and informal helpers all too often add insult to injury when survivors reach out for help and how helpers’ beliefs and behaviors are tied to patriarchal norms. Applicable theories of the stay/leave process are presented and assessed. Past empirical and theoretical reviews are updated. The updated information includes the unique experiences of distinctive subgroups. For example, particular barriers may exist for specific cultural groups, races, and religions. Those with children and with more traditional family norms face additional challenges. Counterintuitively, those married to an affluent, high-status abuser often encounter unique barriers.

Information and insights from this chapter will help professionals, paraprofessionals, and nonprofessionals further their understanding of abuse victims. It will increase their sensitivity and effectiveness in responding to victims. Several innovative programs for improving survivors’ decision-making are described.

This chapter was initially published with an incorrect copyright holder name. It has been corrected to © Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adjei, S. B. (2017). Entrapment of victims of spousal abuse in Ghana: A discursive analysis of family identity and agency of battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(5), 730–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838002250769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2007). The postseparation psychological recovery of domestic abuse survivors. Civic Research Institute, 29-1–29-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, V. R., Khaw, L. B. L., Bermea, A., & Hardesty, J. L. (2020). Future directions in intimate partner violence research: An intersectionality framework for analyzing Women’s processes of leaving abusive relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519900939.

  • Beaulaurier, R. L., Seff, L. R., Newman, F. L., & Dunlop, B. (2007). External barriers to help seeking for older women who experience intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 22(8), 747–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. E., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2007). The dynamics of staying and leaving: Implications for battered women’s emotional well-being and experiences of violence at the end of a year. Journal of Family Violence, 22(6), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9096-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2005). An African-centered approach to domestic violence. Families in Society, 86(2), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermea, A. M., Khaw, L., Hardesty, J. L., Rosenbloom, L., & Salerno, C. (2017). Mental and active preparation: Examining variations in women’s processes of preparing to leave abusive relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517692332.

  • Bowker, L. H. (1983). Beating wife-beating. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breckenridge, J., Chung, D., Spinney, A., & Zufferey, C. (2015). National mapping and meta-evaluation outlining key features of effective “safe at home” programs that enhance safety and prevent homelessness for women and their children who have experienced domestic and family violence. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety Limited (ANROWS) https://d2rn9gno7zhxqg.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/19024632/final-5_3.1-Landscapes-SafeAtHome-29-7-2015-2.pdf

  • Brennan, P. (1990). Her ‘Shattered Dreams’. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/tv/1990/05/13/her-shattered-dreams/d7cd4e2e-9b7d-4912-8861-1809f2626212/

  • Brooks, A. N., & McFarlane, J. (2018, April). A literature review: Qualitative studies of women parenting during abuse. Nursing Forum, 53(2), pp. 137–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. G., O’Malley, T. L., Folb, B., Hagen, C. A., & Rabinovich, B. A. (2019). Conceptual factors that support safety behaviors among abuse survivors: A literature review. Partner Abuse, 10(4), 452–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burman, S. (2003). Battered women: Stages of change and other treatment models that instigate and sustain leaving. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 3(1), 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J. C., Dado, D., Ashton, S., Hawker, L., Cluss, P. A., Buranosky, R., & Scholle, S. H. (2006). Understanding behavior change for women experiencing intimate partner violence: Mapping the ups and downs using the stages of change. Patient Education and Counseling, 62(3), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PEC.2006.06.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J. C., Dado, D., Hawker, L., Cluss, P. A., Buranosky, R., Slagel, L., … & Scholle, S. H. (2010). Understanding turning points in intimate partner violence: Factors and circumstances leading women victims toward change. Journal of Women's Health,, 19(2), 251–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cluss, P. A., Chang, J. C., Hawker, L., Scholle, S. H., Dado, D., Buranosky, R., & Goldstrohm, S. (2006). The process of change for victims of intimate partner violence: Support for a psychosocial readiness model. Women’s Health Issues, 16(5), 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copp, J. E., Giordano, P. C., Longmore, M. A., & Manning, W. D. (2015). Stay-or-leave decision making in nonviolent and violent dating relationships. Violence and Victims, 30(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, J. D., Whiting, J. B., & Aamar, R. O. (2015). Why I stayed/left: An analysis of voices of intimate partner violence on social media. Contemporary Family Therapy, 37(4), 372–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crinall, K., & Hurley, J. (2009). Responding to family violence and preventing homelessness: What is required for effective implementation of ‘Safe at Home’ Programs? Parity, 22(10), 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (2017). Silicon valley CEO pleads ‘no contest’ to abusing his wife – And is offered a deal for less than 30 days in jail. Daily Beast. https://www.thedailybeast.com/silicon-valley-ceo-pleads-no-contest-to-abusing-his-wifeand-is-offered-a-deal-for-less-than-30-days-in-jail

  • Dutton, D. G., & Painter, S. (1993). Emotional attachments in abusive relationships: A test of traumatic bonding theory. Violence and Victims, 8(2), 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, J. J. (2011). Reasons for staying in intimately violent relationships: Comparisons of men and women and messages communicated to self and others. Journal of Family Violence, 26(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, K. B., Perrin, N. A., Hanson, G. C., Messing, J. T., Bloom, T. L., Campbell, J. C., … & Glass, N. E. (2015). Use of online safety decision aid by abused women: Effect on decisional conflict in a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 48(4), 372–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (2011). Staying home leaving violence: Listening to women’s experiences. Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales. http://www.secasa.com.au/assets/Statstics/staying-home-leaving-violence-listening-to-womens-experiences.pdf

  • Enander, V., & Holmberg, C. (2008). Why does she leave?: The leaving process (es) of battered women. Health Care for Women International, 29(3), 200–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D., & Goodman, L. A. (2018). Discounting women: Doubting domestic violence survivors’ credibility and dismissing their experiences. Univ Pa Law Rev, 167, 399–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanslow, J. L., & Robinson, E. M. (2010). Help-seeking behaviors and reasons for help seeking reported by a representative sample of women victims of intimate partner violence in New Zealand. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(5), 929–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Gilboe, M., Varcoe, C., Scott-Storey, K., Wuest, J., Case, J., Currie, L. M., … & Wathen, C. N. (2017). A tailored online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: The iCAN plan 4 safety randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health,, 17(1), 273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Gilboe, M., Varcoe, C., Scott-Storey, K., Perrin, N., Wuest, J., Wathen, C. N., et al. (2020). Longitudinal impacts of an online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: Randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frasier, P. Y., Slatt, L., Kowlowitz, V., & Glowa, P. T. (2001). Using the stages of change model to counsel victims of intimate partner violence. Patient Education and Counseling, 43(2), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00152-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty, J. L., & Chung, G. H. (2006). Intimate partner violence, parental divorce, and child custody: Directions for intervention and future research. Family Relations, 55(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00370.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty, J. L., & Ganong, L. H. (2006). How women make custody decisions and manage coparenting with abusive former husbands. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(4), 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506065983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty, J. L., Oswald, R. F., Khaw, L., & Fonseca, C. (2011). Lesbian/bisexual mothers and intimate partner violence: Help seeking in the context of social and legal vulnerability. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 28–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselschwerdt, M. L., & Hardesty, J. L. (2017). Managing secrecy and disclosure of domestic violence in affluent communities. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(2), 556–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, K., Tarzia, L., Valpied, J., Murray, E., Humphreys, C., Taft, A., … & Glass, N. (2019). An online healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence (I-DECIDE): A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Public Health, 4(6), e301–e310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. (2016, December 16). Coordinated community response (Class room presentation). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Social Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. (1990). An analysis of domestic violence in Asian American communities. Women & Therapy, 9(1–2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015v09n01_08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holderness, C. (2018, February 12). Rob Porter is my ex-husband. Here’s what you should know about abuse. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/rob-porter-is-my-ex-husband-heres-what-you-should-know-about-abuse/2018/02/12/3c7edcb8-1033-11e8-9065-e55346f6de81_story.html

  • Humphreys, C., & Absler, D. (2011). History repeating: Child protection responses to domestic violence. Child & Family Social Work, 16(4), 464–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeltsen, M. (2017). Former Apple engineer describes domestic abuse in chilling courtroom statement. Huffington Post. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/neha-rastogi-domestic-violence_us_58f66ecde4b05b9d613df577

  • Johnson, L. B. (2010). Spouse Violence among Police Officers. In Ross L. E. (ed.), The War against Domestic Violence. New York: CRC Press, pp. 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaw, L., & Hardesty, J. L. (2007). Theorizing the process of leaving: Turning points and trajectories in the stages of change. Family Relations, 56(4), 413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koziol-McLain, J., Vandal, A. C., Nada-Raja, S., Wilson, D., Glass, N. E., Eden, K. B., … & Case, J. (2015). A web-based intervention for abused women: The New Zealand isafe randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger, C. C., & Nason-Clark, N. (2010). No place for abuse: Biblical & practical resources to counteract domestic violence. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, K. K. (2010). When is it enough for me to leave?: Black and Hispanic women’s response to violent relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 25(7), 669–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, K. K., Saunders, D. G., & Lingling Zhang, L. (2011). A comparison of women of color and non-hispanic white women on factors related to leaving a violent relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(5), 1036–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510376496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola, J. M. (2013). Honey, I’m home: Addressing the problem of officer domestic violence. J Civ Rights Econ Dev, 27, 347–368. Retrievedfrom http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/sjjlc27&g_sent=1&id=361.

  • McMullin, S. (2013). Clergy and the pastoral response to domestic violence. In Strengthening families and ending abuse: Churches and their leaders look to the future, Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers, (pp. 183–199).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. (2012). Why women stay: A theoretical examination of rational choice and moral reasoning in the context of intimate partner violence. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 45(2), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motivational Interviewing and Intimate Partner Violence Workgroup. (2010). Guiding as practice: Motivational interviewing and trauma-informed work with survivors of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 1(1), 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. B., & Lutz, D. J. (2017). The importance of cognitive dissonance in understanding and treating victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(5), 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overstreet, N. M., & Quinn, D. M. (2013). The intimate partner violence stigmatization model and barriers to help seeking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G., & Winstok, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: Toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45(1), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter H, (2006). Understanding African American women’s experience with intimate partner abuse using an integrated approach. Feminist Criminology, 1(2), 106–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L. A., Hughes, M. J., & Murray, C. A. (2008). Applying motivational interviewing in a domestic violence shelter: A pilot study evaluating the training of shelter staff. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 17(3), 296–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisenhofer, S., & Taft, A. (2013). Women’s journey to safety–The transtheoretical model in clinical practice when working with women experiencing intimate partner violence: A scientific review and clinical guidance. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(3), 536–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhatigan, D. L., Street, A. E., & Axsom, D. K. (2006). A critical review of theories to explain violent relationship termination: Implications for research and intervention. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(3), 321–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, K. V., Cerulli, C., Dichter, M. E., Kothari, C. L., & Barg, F. K. (2010). “I didn’t want to put them through that”: The influence of children on victim decision-making in intimate partner violence cases. Journal of Family Violence, 25(5), 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richie, B. (2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America’s prison nation. New York, NY: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizo, C. F., & Macy, R. J. (2011). Help seeking and barriers of Hispanic partner violence survivors: A systematic review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(3), 250–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 558–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1424–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (2015). Research Based Recommendations for Child Custody Evaluation Practices and Policies in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Child Custody 12(1), 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (2018). Abusive relationships: Why it’s so hard for women to ‘just leave’. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/abusive-relationships-why-its-so-hard-for-women-to-just-leave-93449

  • Saunders, D. G., & Oglesby, K. H. (2016). No way to turn: Traps encountered by many battered women with negative child custody experiences. Journal of Child Custody, 13(2–3), 154–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G., Lynch, A. B., Grayson, M., & Linz, D. (1987). The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2(1), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. D. (1988). Marital status and woman abuse theory. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shotland, R. L., & Straw, M. K. (1976). Bystander response to an assault: When a man attacks a woman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 990–999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, L. M. (2012). TEDxRainier: “Why domestic violence victims don’t leave.” https://www.ted.com/talks/leslie_morgan_steiner_why_domestic_violence_victims_don_t_leave

  • Storer, H. L., Rodriguez, M., & Franklin, R. (2018). “Leaving was a process, not an event”: The lived experience of dating and domestic violence in 140 characters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518816325.

  • Tarzia, L., Murray, E., Humphreys, C., Glass, N., Taft, A., Valpied, J., & Hegarty, K. (2016). I-DECIDE: An online intervention drawing on the psychosocial readiness model for women experiencing domestic violence. Women's Health Issues, 26(2), 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. Y. (2016). No Resting Place. Violence Against Women 11 (12):1473–1489

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapar-Björkert, S., & Morgan, K. J. (2010). “But sometimes I think… they put themselves in the situation”: Exploring blame and responsibility in interpersonal violence. Violence Against Women, 16(1), 32–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, S. (1991). A comparison of wife abuse between two cultures: Perceptions, attitudes, nature, and context. Issues in Mental Health, 12, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR – United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2015). Women on the run: First-hand accounts of refugees fleeing El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico. https://www.acnur.org/fileadmin/Documentos/Publicaciones/2015/10228.pdf

  • Vandello, J. A., Cohen, D., Grandon, R., & Franiuk, R. (2009). Stand by your man: Indirect prescriptions for honorable violence and feminine loyalty in Canada, Chile, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidales, G. T. (2010). Arrested justice: The multifaceted plight of immigrant Latinas who faced domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 25(6), 533–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R., Logan, T., Jordan, C. E., & Campbell, J. C. (2004). An integrative review of separation in the context of victimization. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5(2), 143–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838003262333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, J. (2017). Why I stayed. Blogpost April 24, 2017. Available at http://thepullofgrace.com/journal/2017/4/24/why-i-stayed

  • Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (2016). Beyond survival: Reclaiming self after leaving an abusive male partner. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 32(4), 79–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamawaki, N., Ochoa-Shipp, M., Pulsipher, C., Harlos, A., & Swindler, S. (2012). Perceptions of domestic violence: The effects of domestic violence myths, victim’s relationship with her abuser, and the decision to return to her abuser. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(16), 3195–3212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel G. Saunders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Saunders, D.G. (2020). Barriers to Leaving an Abusive Relationship. In: Geffner, R., White, J.W., Hamberger, L.K., Rosenbaum, A., Vaughan-Eden, V., Vieth, V.I. (eds) Handbook of Interpersonal Violence and Abuse Across the Lifespan. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62122-7_186-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62122-7_186-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62122-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62122-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics