Skip to main content

One Dimensional Shallow Foundation Macro-element

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developments in Earthquake Geotechnics

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 43))

Abstract

Recently a number of macro-element models have been formulated for assessing the performance of shallow foundations during earthquake loading. These provide a computational tool that represents the nonlinear dynamic behavior of the foundation in a manner much simpler than finite element modelling; consequently, they are useful for preliminary design. The basis of this chapter is the shallow foundation moment-rotation pushover curve, which is bracketed by the rotational stiffness at small deformations, determined by the small strain stiffness of the soil, and the moment capacity, which is a function of the soil shear strength and the vertical load carried by the foundation. Between these two limits there is a curved transition. The paper argues that when the vertical load carried by an embedded foundation is a small fraction of the vertical bearing strength, the moment-rotation behavior dominates the response. This means that the structure-foundation system can be reduced to a single degree of freedom (SDOF) model.

The form of the shallow foundation moment-rotation curve obtained from experimental and computational modelling is approximately hyperbolic; the nonlinear shape is due in part to the nonlinear deformation of the soil beneath the foundation but also to gradual loss of contact between the underside of the foundation and the soil below. The paper proposes a generalization of the pushover curve to give a shallow foundation cyclic moment-rotation relationship. The hysteretic damping properties of the model, as a function of the foundation rotation amplitude, are demonstrated as is the relation between secant stiffness and foundation rotation.

This chapter shows how the model can be applied in numerical simulation of structure-foundation systems subject to earthquake time histories. The significance of the maximum displacement (foundation rotation) in relation to the damping and residual rotation at the end of the earthquake record are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Algie TB (2011). Nonlinear rotational behaviour of shallow foundations on cohesive soil. Ph.D. thesis, University of Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Algie TB, Pender MJ, Orense RP (2010) Large scale field tests of rocking foundations on an Auckland residual soil. In: Orense R, Chouw N, Pender M (eds) Soil foundation structure interaction. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden, pp 57–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasopoulos I, Kontoroupi T (2014) Simplified approximate method for analysis of rocking systems accounting for soil inelasticity and foundation uplifting. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 56:28–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G, Loli M, Apostolou M, Gerolymos N (2010) Soil failure can be used for seismic protection of structures. Bull Earthq Eng 8(2):309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr A (2016) Ruaumoko. Carr Research Ltd, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzigogos CT, Pecker A, Salençon J (2007) A macro-element for dynamic soil-structure interaction analyses of shallow foundations. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, June 25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzigogos, C. T., A. Pecker, and J. Salenc¸on (2009). Macroelement modeling of shallow foundations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29, 765–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of structures, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer C, Pecker A, Davenne L (2001) Cyclic macro-element for soil-structure interaction: material and geometrical non-linearities. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 25(13):1257–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer C, Pecker A, Davenne L (2002) Modelling of nonlinear dynamic behaviour of a shallow strip foundation with macro-element. J Earthq Eng:175–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng L, Kutter B, Kunnath S (2014) Seismic design of rocking shallow foundations: displacement-based methodology. J Bridge Eng 19(11). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000616

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM, Chang CY (1970) Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. Proc ASCE, J Soil Mech Found Div 96(SM5):1629–1653

    Google Scholar 

  • Figini R, Paolucci R, Chatzigogos CT (2012) A macro-element model for non-linear soil-shallow foundation-structure interaction under seismic loads: theoretical development and experimental validation on large scale tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(3):475–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajan S, Kutter BL (2008) Capacity, settlement, and energy dissipation of shallow footings subjected to rocking. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 134(8):1129–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G (2015) Avoiding over-conservatism and conventional dogmas in seismic geotechnical design. Keynote address. 12th Australia-New Zealand conference on Geomechanics, Wellington, February

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1996) Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics. Oxford Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly TE (2009) Tentative seismic design guidelines for rocking structures. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 42(4):239–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondner RL (1963) Hyperbolic stress-strain response: cohesive soils. Proc ASCE J Soil Mech Found Div 89(SM1):115–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Loli M, Knappett JA, Brown MJ, Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G (2015) Centrifuge testing of a bridge pier on a rocking isolated foundation supported on unconnected piles. In: Proceedings of 6th ICEGE, paper 362, Christchurch, November

    Google Scholar 

  • Millen M. (2015). Integrated performance-based design of building-foundation systems. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotidou AI, Gazetas G, Gerolymos N (2012) Pushover and seismic response of foundations on stiff clay: analysis with P-delta effects. Earthquake Spectra 28(4):1589–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecker A, Teyssandier J-P (1998) Seismic design for the foundations of the Rion Antirion bridge. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 131(Jan.):4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pender MJ (2007) Seismic design and performance of surface foundations. In: Pitalakis KD (ed) Chapter 10, Earthquake geotechnical engineering. Springer, pp 215–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Pender MJ (2017) Bearing strength surfaces implied in conventional bearing capacity calculations. Geotechnique 67(4):313–424. doi:10.1680/geot./16-P-024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pender MJ, Algie TB, Storie LB, Salimath R (2017) One dimensional moment-rotation macro-element for performance based design of shallow foundations. In: Proceedings performance based design III (PBDIII), Vancouver. Paper 332

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaxis (2012) Plaxis 3D – version 2012. Plaxis b.v, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • PTC (2015) Mathcad 15 (M045). PTC Corporation, Needham

    Google Scholar 

  • Salimath R (2017) Experimental and finite element study of moment-rotation response of shallow foundations on clay. PhD thesis, University of Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata A, Sozen M (1976) Substitute structure method for the seismic design in reinforced concrete. J Struct Eng 102(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Storie LB (2017) Soil-foundation-structure interaction in the earthquake performance of multi-storey buildings on shallow foundations. PhD thesis, University of Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Storie LB, Knappett JA, Pender MJ (2015) Centrifuge modelling of the energy dissipation characteristics of mid-rise buildings with raft foundations on dense cohesionless soil. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Toh JCW (2008) Performance based aseismic design of shallow foundations. ME thesis, University of Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Toh JCW, Pender MJ (2010) Design approaches and criteria for earthquake-resistant shallow foundation systems. In: Orense RP, Chouw N, Pender MJ (eds) Soil-foundation-structure-interaction. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden, pp 173–180

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JP (1985) Dynamic soil-structure interaction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JP, Deeks AJ (2004) Foundation vibration analysis: a strength of materials approach. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Pender .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pender, M.J., Algie, T.B., Salimath, R., Storie, L.B. (2018). One Dimensional Shallow Foundation Macro-element. In: Iai, S. (eds) Developments in Earthquake Geotechnics. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62069-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics