Skip to main content

Cultural, Psychological, and Organoleptic Factors Related to the Use of Stingless Bees by Rural Residents of Northern Misiones, Argentina

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pot-Pollen in Stingless Bee Melittology

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationship between cultural (e.g., utilitarian), psychological (e.g., prominence and ease of observation), and organoleptic factors (e.g., taste perceptions) related to the use of stingless bees. We chose this subject in order to understand human drivers of resource exploitation and discuss it from an ethnobiological point of view according to the “ecological apparency hypothesis.” Understanding how valuation and election processes operate can contribute to conservation and management approaches for stingless bees. We explored the relationships between eight quantitative explanatory variables based mainly on information provided by local people. The results reveal, contrary to expectations, that the use of stingless bees is not associated with their appearance or characteristics of their honey. The process of evaluating ethnospecies could in turn be influenced by some aesthetic and behavioral variables such as beauty, unhygienic habits, or other behaviors. Our analysis allowed identifying scarcely considered variables in the assessment of natural resource exploitation and management, primarily cultural and psychological factors. The combined use of local and scientific knowledge to solve complex socio-ecological problems is promising but requires more effort. Studying in what circumstances, under which methodologies, and to what scale local ecological knowledge is useful to predict exploitation of natural resources is posed as a future priority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albuquerque UP, de Lucena RFP. 2005. Can apparency affect the use of plants by local people in tropical forests? Interciencia 30: 506–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque UP, de Sousa Araujo TA, Alves-Ramos M, Nascimento VT, de Lucena RFP, MonteiroJM, Alencar NL, Araujo EL. 2009. How ethnobotany can aid biodiversity conservation: reflections on investigations in the semi-arid region of NE Brazil. Biodiversity Conservation 18: 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque UP, Muniz de Medeiros P. 2013. What is evolutionary ethnobiology? Ethnobiology and Conservation 2: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida CFCBR, Lima e Silva TC, Amorim ELC, Maia MBS, Albuquerque UP. 2005. Life strategy and chemical composition as predictors of the selection of medicinal plants from the caatinga (Northeast Brazil). Journal of Arid Environment 62: 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez LJ, Rasmussen C, Abrahamovich AH. 2016. Nueva especie de Plebeia Schwarz, clave para las especies argentinas de Plebeia y comentarios sobre Plectoplebeia en la Argentina (Hymenoptera: Meliponini). Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 18: 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anadón JD, Giménez A, Ballestar R, Pérez I. 2009. Evaluation of local ecological knowledge as a method for collecting extensive data on animal abundance. Conservation Biology 23: 617–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arenas P. 2003. Etnografía y Alimentación entre los Toba ñachilamoleek y wichí-lhuku’tas del chaco central (Argentina). Arenas P; Buenos Aires, Argentina.562pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista MA, Ramalho M, Soares EA. 2003. Nesting sites and abundance of Meliponini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in heterogeneous hábitat of the Atlantic Rain Forest, Bahia, Brazil. Lundiana 4: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley JW, Rodrıguez G. 2001. Honduran folk entomology. Current Anthropology 42: 285–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F. 1999. Sacred Ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor and Francis; Philadelphia, United States: 209 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin B. 1992. Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press; Princeton, New Jersey, USA. 270 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard RH. 2000. Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications; London, United Kingdom. 824 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster JS. 1985. Requiem for the omniscient informant: there’s life in the old girl yet. pp. 177–197. In Dougherty J, ed. Directions in cognitive anthropology. University of Illinois Press; Champaign, Illinois, United States. 451 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho CAL, Alves RMO, Souza BA. 2003. Criação de abelhas sem ferrão: Aspectos práticos. DAS/DDP and Universidade Federal de Bahia; Salvador, BA, Brazil. 42 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagas F., Carvalho S. 2005. Iniciação à criação de uruçu - Meliponário São Saruê. Chagas F, Carvalho S; Igarassu Pernambuco. 50 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortopassi-Laurino M, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Roubik DW, Dollin A, Heard T, Aguilar I, Venturieri GC, Eardley C, Nogueira-Neto P. 2006. Global meliponiculture: challenges and opportunities. Apidologie 37: 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Neto EM. 2006. Cricket singing means rain: semiotic meaning of insects in the district of Pedra Branca, Bahia State, northeastern Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasilera de Ciência 78: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deliza R, Vit P. 2013. Sensory evaluation of stingless bee pot-honey. pp 349–361. In Vit P, Pedro SRM, Roubik D, eds. Pot-Honey a Legacy of Stingless Bees; Springer; New York, UE. 654 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escamilla A, Sanvicente M, Sosa M, Galindo-Leal C. 2008. Habitat mosaic, wildlife availability, and hunting in the tropical forest of Calakmul, Mexico. Conservation Biology 14: 1592–1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeano G. 2000. Forest use at the Pacific Coast of Chocó, Colombia: a quantitative approach. Economic Botany 54: 358–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galindo-Leal C, Camara IG. 2003. Atlantic Forest hotspot status: An overview. pp. 3–11. In Galindo-Leal C, Camara IG, eds. The Atlantic Forest of South América: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook. Island Press; Washington DC, USA. 488 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg EL. 1887. Viaje a Misiones. I Parte. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Córdoba. 10:5–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo AE, De Angelo CD, Aide TM. 2008. Thirty years of human demography and land-use change in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina: an evaluation of the forest transition model. Ecology and Society 13: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jodelet D. 1986. La representación social: Fenómenos, conceptos y teoría. pp. 469–494. In Moscovici S, ed. Psicología Social II. Ediciones Paidós; Barcelona, España. 543 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamienkowski N, Arenas P. 2012. La colecta de miel o “meleo” en el Gran Chaco: Su relevancia en etnobotánica. pp. 71–116. In Arenas P, ed. Etnobotánica en zonas áridas y semiáridas del cono sur de Sudamérica. CEFYBO-CONICET; Buenos Aires, Argentina. 270 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KU, Nichols JD, Seidensticker J, Dinerstein E, Smith JLD, McDougal C, JohnsinghAJT, Chundawat RS, Thapar V. 2003. Science deficiency in conservation practice: the monitoring of tiger populations in India. Animal Conservation 6: 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kujawska M, Zamudio F, Hilgert NI. 2012. Honey-based mixtures used in home medicine by non-indigenous population of Misiones, Argentina. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. doi:10.1155/2012/579350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laplantine F. 1999. Antropología de la enfermedad. Ediciones del Sol; Buenos Aires, Argentina. 418 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano A, Lima-Araújo E, Medeiros TMF, Albuquerque UP. 2014. The apparency hypothesis applied to a local pharmacopoeia in the Brazilian northeast. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 10: 2–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lucena RFP, Medeiros PM, Lima-Araújo E, Alves AG, Albuquerque UP. 2012. The ecological apparency hypothesis and the importance of useful plants in rural communities from Northeastern Brazil: An assessment based on use value. Journal of Environment Management 96: 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D. 2000. Culture and psychology. Brooks Cole Publishing Co.; Pacific Grove, California. 544 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD. 1969. Comparative social behavior of bees. Annual Review of Entomology 14: 299–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan JM, Robbins MCE. 2001. Emotional meaning and the cognitive organization of ethnozoological domains. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 240–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parra F, Casas A, Peñaloza-Ramírez JM, Cortés-Palomec AC, Rocha-Ramírez V, González-Rodríguez A. 2010. Evolution under domestication: ongoing artificial selection and divergence of wild and managed Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) populations in the Tehuacan Valley, Mexico. Annals of Botany 106: 483–496.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Posey DA. 1983. Keeping of stingless bees by the kayapo’ indians of Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology 3: 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE. 2010. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 345–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García V, Huanca T, Vadez V, Leonard WR, Wilkie D. 2006. Cultural, practical and economic value of wild plants: a quantitative study in the bolivian amazon. Economic Botany 60: 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseman IJ, Smith CA. 2001. Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies.pp. 3–19. In: Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T, eds. Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press; New York, USA. 496 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch E. 1978. Principies of Categorization. pp. 28–49. In Rosch E, Lloyd B, eds. Cognition and Categorization. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; Hilldale, United States. 336 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosso JM, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Cortopassi-Laurino M. 2001. Meliponicultura en Brasil I: Situación en 2001 y Perspectivas. pp. 28–35. In Memorias del II Seminario Mexicano sobre Abejas sin Aguijón. Mérida, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW. 2006. Stingless bee nesting biology. Apidologie 37: 124–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiavoni G. 1995. Organización doméstica y apropiación de tierras fiscales en la Provincia de Misiones (Argentina). Desarrollo Económico 34: 595–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silveira FA, Melo GAR, Almeida EAB. 2002. Abelhas Brasileiras; Sistemática e Identificação. Min. Meio Ambiente/Fund. Araraucária; Bello Horizonte, Brasil. 253 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stave J, Oba G, Nordal I, Stenseth NC. 2007. Traditional ecological knowledge of a riverine forest in Turkana, Kenya: implications for research and management. Biodiversity Conservation 16: 1471–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutrop U. 2001. List task and a cognitive salience index. Field Methods 13: 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vabø M, Hansen H. 2014. The relationship between food preferences and food choice: a theoretical discussion. International Journal of Business and Social Science 5: 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturieri GC, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL. 2000. Scaptotrigona nigrohirta e Melipona melanoventer (Apidae, Meliponinae): Espécies amazónicas com potencialidade para a meliponicultura. pp. 356–356. In IV Encontro Sobre Abelhas. Faculdade de Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto; Ribeirão Preto, Brasil. 356 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturieri GC, Raiol VFO, Pereira CAB. 2003. Avaliação da introdução de da criação racional de Melipona fasciculata (Apidae: Meliponina) entre os agricultores familiares de Bragança, Belém. Biota Neotropica 3: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wille A. 1983. Biology of the stingless bees. Annual Review of Entomology 28: 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ. 2002. Analysis of Management o Animal Populations. Academic Press; UE. 816 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton S. 2013. Ethnobiology 5: Interdisciplinarity in an Era of Rapid Environmental Change. Ethnobiology letters 4: 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamudio F, Kujawska M, Hilgert NI. 2010. The honey as medicinal resource: Comparison between Polish and multiethnic settlements of the Atlantic Forest, Misiones, Argentina. The Open Complementary Medicine Journal 2: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamudio F, Hilgert NI. 2011. Mieles y plantas en la medicina criolla del norte de Misiones, Argentina. Bonplandia 20: 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamudio F, Hilgert NI. 2012a. ¿Cómo los conocimientos locales aportan información sobre la riqueza de especies de abejas sin aguijón (Apidae: Meliponini) del norte de Misiones, Argentina? Interciencia 37: 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamudio F, Hilgert NI. 2012b. Descriptive attributes used in the characterization of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) in rural populations of the Atlantic Forest (Misiones-Argentina). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 8: 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zamudio F, Hilgert NI. 2015. Multi-dimensionality and variability in folk classification of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 11:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamudio F, Álvarez LJ 2016. Abejas sin aguijón de Misiones: una guía etnotaxonómica para su identificación en el campo. Editorial de la UNC; Córdoba, Argentina. 218 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the rural inhabitants of Misiones for sharing their knowledge and great cordiality; P. Tubaro, F. Silveira, C. Rasmussen, and L. Álvarez, for their contribution to the identification of the collected stingless bees; and CONICET and The Rufford Foundation for financial support. We thank Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico (CeIBA) and IBS for institutional support and Conservación Argentina (CA) foundation and “yateí” reserve for logistic support. The authors are researchers from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Zamudio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zamudio, F., Hilgert, N.I. (2018). Cultural, Psychological, and Organoleptic Factors Related to the Use of Stingless Bees by Rural Residents of Northern Misiones, Argentina. In: Vit, P., Pedro, S., Roubik, D. (eds) Pot-Pollen in Stingless Bee Melittology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61839-5_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics