Skip to main content

Optimal Multistage Defined-Benefit Pension Fund Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Recent Advances in Commodity and Financial Modeling

Abstract

We present an asset-liability management (ALM) model designed to support optimal strategic planning by a defined benefit (DB) occupational pension fund (PF) manager. PF ALM problems are by nature long-term decision problems with stochastic elements affecting both assets and liabilities. Increasingly PFs operating in the second pillar of modern pension systems are subject to mark-to-market accounting standards and constrained to monitor their risk capital exposure over time. The ALM problem is formulated as a multi-stage stochastic program (MSP) with an underlying scenario tree structure in which decision stages are combined with non-decision annual stages aimed at mapping carefully the evolution of PF’s liabilities. We present a case-study of an underfunded PF with an initial liquidity shortage and show how a dynamic policy, relying on a set of specific decision criteria, is able to gain a long-term equilibrium solvency condition over a 20 year horizon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • H. Aro, T. Pennanen, Liability driven investment in longevity risk management, in Financial Decision Making Under Uncertainty, ed. by G. Consigli, D. Kuhn, P. Brandimarte. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (Springer, US, 2016), pp. 121–136

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Birge, F. Louveaux, Introduction to Stochastic Programming (Springer, New York, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Consigli, M.A.H. Dempster, Dynamic stochastic programming for asset-liability management. Ann. Oper. Res. 81, 131–162 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Consigli, V. Moriggia, Applying stochastic programming to insurance portfolios stress-testing. Quant. Finance Lett. 2(1), 7–13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Consigli, G. Iaquinta, V. Moriggia, Path-dependent scenario trees for multistage stochastic programmes in finance. Quant. Finan. 12(8), 1265–1281 (2012a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Consigli, G. Iaquinta, V. Moriggia, M. di Tria, D. Musitelli, Retirement planning in individual asset–liability management. IMA J. Manag. Math. 23(4), 365–396 (2012b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Consigli, D. Kuhn, P. Brandimarte, Optimal financial decision making in finance, in Financial Decision Making Under Uncertainty, ed. by G. Consigli, D. Kuhn, P. Brandimarte. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (Springer, US, 2016), pp. 255–290

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Consiglio, F. Cocco, S.A. Zenios, Scenario optimization asset and liability modelling for individual investors. Ann. Oper. Res. 191, 152–167 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Consiglio, M. Tumminello, S.A. Zenios, Designing Guarantee Options in Defined Contributions Pension Plans (The Wharton Financial Institutions Center, Philadelphia, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A.H. Dempster, M. Germano, E.A. Medova, M.I. Rietbergen, F. Sandrini, M. Scrowston, Designing minimum guaranteed return funds. Quant. Finance 7(2), 245–256 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.A.H. Dempster, E.A. Medova, Y.S. Yong, Comparison of sampling methods for dynamic stochastic programming, in Stochastic Optimization Methods in Finance and Energy (Springer, New York, 2011), pp. 389–425

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • C.L. Dert, A dynamic model for asset liability management for defined benefit pension funds. Worldw. Asset Liabil. Model. 10, 501–536 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dupačová, G. Consigli, S.W. Wallace, Scenarios for multistage stochastic programmes. Ann. Oper. Res. 100, 25–53 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Franzen, G. Scheuenstuhl, J. Yermo, S. Blome, K. Fachinger, Pension Fund Regulation and Risk Management: Results from an ALM Optimisation Exercise, vol. 8 (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Geyer, W.T. Ziemba, The Innovest Austrian pension fund financial planning model InnoALM. Oper. Res. 56(4), 797–810 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Glasserman, Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (Springer, New York, 2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • A.K. Konicz, D. Pisinger, K.M. Rasmussen, M. Steffensen, A combined stochastic programming and optimal control approach to personal finance and pensions. OR Spectr. 37(3), 583–616 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.A. Medova, J.K. Murphy, A.P. Owen, K. Rehman, Individual asset liability management. Quant. Finance 8(6), 547–560 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Mulvey, K.D. Simsek, Z. Zhang, Improving investment performance for pension plans. J. Asset Manag. 7(2), 93–108 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Mulvey, C. Ural, Z. Zhang, Improving performance for long-term investors: wide diversification, leverage, and overlay strategies. Quant. Finance 7(2), 175–187 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Mulvey, K.D. Simsek, Z. Zhang, F.J. Fabozzi, W.R. Pauling, Assisting defined-benefit pension plans. Oper. Res. 56(5), 1066–1078 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Nelson, A.F. Siegel, Parsimonious modeling of yield curves. J. Bus. 60, 473–489 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. OECD factbook 2011, public finance-pension expenditure (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Pachamanova, N. Gulpinar, E. Canakoglu, Robust data-driven approaches to pension fund asset-liability management under uncertainty, in Financial Decision Making Under Uncertainty, ed. by G. Consigli, D. Kuhn, P. Brandimarte. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (Springer, US, 2016), pp. 89–119

    Google Scholar 

  • G.Ch. Pflug, A. Świetanowski, Dynamic asset allocation under uncertainty for pension fund management. Control Cybern. 28, 755–777 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Senders, Survey of the asset and liability management practices of European pension funds. Technical report, EDHEC (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Shaw, Fifty years of united kingdom national population projections: how accurate have they been? Popul. Trends 128, 8 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • W.T. Ziemba, J.M. Mulvey (ed.), Worldwide Asset and Liability Modeling, vol. 10 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research includes the formulation of a pension fund ALM problem reflecting a real-world case-study developed in cooperation between Allianz Investment Management and University of Bergamo. The presented numerical evidence has been modified and rescaled for confidentiality reasons but it does reflect actual operational conditions and the presented results remain valid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Consigli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

In Tables 13.2 and 13.3 we show the estimated statistical parameters adopted to generate correlated quarterly returns through a Monte Carlo simulation (Glasserman, 2003; Consigli et al., 2012a) for each benchmark i and node n. Once the return scenarios are aggregated in tree form, they are passed to an algebraic language deterministic model generator, to produce the stochastic program deterministic equivalent instance (Consigli and Dempster, 1998). The returns’ statistics have been estimated on an historical window composed of 63 observations starting from the first quarter of 1999 till the third quarter of 2014.

Table 13.2 Average annual price (ρ) and income (ξ) returns of the entire asset universe. These parameters are estimated as the historical mean value of time series from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2014. Data are in percentage
Table 13.3 Estimated variance-covariance matrix of the price annual returns with historical data from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2014 of the asset universe: EURIBOR 3m (E-3m), Treasury (T), Securitized (Sec), Corporate Investment Grade (IG) and High Yield (HY), Real Estate (R-E), Equity (Eq) and TIPS

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Consigli, G. et al. (2018). Optimal Multistage Defined-Benefit Pension Fund Management. In: Consigli, G., Stefani, S., Zambruno, G. (eds) Handbook of Recent Advances in Commodity and Financial Modeling. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 257. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61320-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics