Skip to main content

Gödel’s Legacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Humanizing Mathematics and its Philosophy

Abstract

In his truly remarkable paper of 1931, Kurt Gödel casts grave doubts on the viability of Hilbert’s program for providing a consistent foundation for mathematics. In addition, it compelled logicians to view their subject through entirely new lenses. Two years later, Gödel was invited by the Mathematical Association of America to address one of its meetings. In his address, he spoke as follows:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gödel [5].

  2. 2.

    See the Appendix for a list of the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms.

  3. 3.

    See [2, pp. 331–339].

  4. 4.

    For a sample of the many propositions of this kind that Friedman has developed, see [3, 4].

  5. 5.

    See, e.g., [1, 10].

  6. 6.

    Gödel [7].

  7. 7.

    To prove that the existence of inaccessible cardinals cannot be proved from the ZF axioms, one observes that a model of ZF could be defined using a set of that cardinality. The existence of such a model would imply that the ZF axioms are consistent. Since the entire proof could be carried out within the scope of the ZF axioms, this is impossible because, as Gödel has shown, if the ZF axioms are consistent, their consistency cannot be proved within a system based on those axioms.

  8. 8.

    See [8] which discusses the historical development of the study of “large” cardinals as well as their inter-relationships. The “Chart of Cardinals” on p. 472 shows the variety of inhabitants of this remarkable zoo of larger and larger sets.

  9. 9.

    This section and the next are based on [9].

  10. 10.

    See the Appendix. Almost everything in ordinary mathematics can be carried out without the final axiom of “Collection.” But Martin’s proof requires this axiom.

  11. 11.

    Gödel [6, p. 307].

References

  1. Davis, Martin, “Unsolvable Problems,” in Jon Barwise, ed., Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North-Holland 1977, pp. 567–594.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, Martin, Yuri Matijasevic, and Julia Robinson, “Hilbert’s Tenth Problem: Diophantine Equations: Positive Aspects of a Negative Solution,” Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol.28(1976), pp. 323–378; Reprinted in Feferman, Solomon, ed. The Collected Works of Julia Robinson, Amer. Math. Soc. 1996, pp.269–378.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman, Harvey, “Finite Functions and the Necessary Use of Large Cardinals,” Annals of Math., vol. 148(1998), pp. 803–893.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman, Harvey, “Mathematically Natural Concrete Incompleteness,” https://u.osu.edu/friedman.8/files/2014/01/Putnam062115pdf-15ku867.pdf. To appear in a volume devoted to Hilary Putnam in the series: Outstanding Contributions to Logic, Sven Ove Hansson, editor-in-chief.

  5. Gödel, Kurt, “The Present Situation in the Foundations of Mathematics,” in Solomon Feferman, et al, eds., Collected Works, vol. III, Oxford 1995, pp. 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gödel, Kurt, “Some Basic Theorems on the Foundations of Mathematics and Their Implication,” in Solomon Feferman, et al, eds., Collected Works, vol. III, Oxford 1995, pp. 304–323.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gödel, Kurt, “What Is Cantor’s Continuum Problem?” in Solomon Feferman, et al, eds., Collected Works, vol. II, Oxford 1995, pp. 176–187.Revised Version: pp. 254–270.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kanamori, Akihiro, The Higher Infinite, Second Edition, Springer 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, Donald, “Descriptive Set Theory: Projective Sets,” in Jon Barwise, ed., Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North-Holland 1977, pp. 783–815.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poonen, Bjorn, “Undecidable Problems: a Sampler” in J. Kennedy, ed., Interpreting Gödel: Critical Essays, Cambridge 2014), pp. 211–241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: The Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms

Appendix: The Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms

For brevity, I have omitted universal quantifiers at the left of these statements. The axioms of separation and collection are each really an infinite sequence of axioms in which the letter ϕ can be replaced by any legitimate formula written in terms of logical operations and the symbols occurring in the other axioms.

Empty set

x ∉ ∅

Extensionality

\(\forall t\,(t \in x \leftrightarrow t \in y) \rightarrow x = y\)

Pairs

t ∈ {x, y} ↔ t = xt = y

Definition

{x} = {x, x} ;   < x, y > = {{ x}, {x, y}}

Definition

\(x \subseteq y\Longleftrightarrow\forall t\! \in \! x\,(t \in y)\)

Power

\(t \in \mathcal{P}(x) \leftrightarrow t \subseteq x\)

Union

\(t \in \bigcup x \leftrightarrow \exists z\! \in \! x\,(t \in z)\)

Definition

\(x \cup y =\bigcup \{ x,y\}\)

Infinity

∅ ∈ ω ;  xωx ∪{ x} ∈ ω

Separation

\(\forall u\exists x\forall t\,[t \in x \leftrightarrow t \in u \wedge \phi (t,\vec{p}\,)]\)

Definition

Fn(f) ⇔ < x, y 1 >, < x, y 2 > ∈ fy 1 = y 2

 

f(x) = y⇔ < x, y > ∈ f

Choice

\(\forall x\exists f\,(\mbox{ Fn}(f) \wedge \forall z\! \in \! x\,[z\neq \emptyset \rightarrow f(z) \in z)])\)

Foundation

\(x\neq \emptyset \rightarrow \exists y\! \in \! x\forall z\! \in \! y\,(z\not\in x)\)

Collection

\(\forall x\! \in \! u\exists y\phi (x,y,\vec{p}) \rightarrow \exists z\forall x\! \in \! u\exists y\! \in \! z\phi (x,y,\vec{p})\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davis, M. (2017). Gödel’s Legacy. In: Sriraman, B. (eds) Humanizing Mathematics and its Philosophy. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61231-7_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics