Skip to main content

Self-Directedness in Work-Related Learning Processes. Theoretical Perspectives and Development of a Measurement Instrument

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agency at Work

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 20))

Abstract

This book chapter investigates the concept of self-directedness in work-related learning processes and its relationship to other related constructs such as self-regulated learning, personal agency, proactive personality and personal initiative. It also describes the development of an instrument to measure self-directedness in work-related learning processes (SDL scale) for use with employees having different qualification levels. The SDL instrument is a 14-item scale which measures an individual’s characteristic adaption to steer and take responsibility in diagnosing learning needs and setting goals, choosing and implementing appropriate learning strategies and evaluating and adjusting the learning process. An exploratory study involving 940 low-qualified and high-qualified employees revealed a unidimensional structure. A second and third study was conducted in a sample of 408 low-qualified employees and in a sample of 787 low-qualified adult learners joining courses in adult education institutions and confirmed the one-factor structure. Discriminant, convergent and cross-cultural validity was also examined. In a fourth study, model fit was compared of the low-qualified and higher-qualified group separately and was found invariant across both samples. In each of the samples, both scales showed satisfactory internal consistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The analyses were performed on the total sample. Similar high loadings were found when the data was analysed separately for the low-qualified and the high-qualified group.

  2. 2.

    Evidence of large MI values with the error terms of item 33 and item 15 was as well found in a CFA performed with the sample in study 1 (total sample and low-qualified and high-qualified sample separately). We found evidence in this to conclude that these measurement error covariances represent systematic, rather than random, measurement error in item responses.

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (Vol. 1). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, K.L., & Morris, S.S. (2000). A correlation between instructor ratings and nursing students self-directed learning readiness scores. In H.B. Long & Ass. (Eds.), Practice & theory in self-directed learning (pp. 151–164). Schaumburg: Motorola University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: Workplace affordance and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockett, R. G. (1985). Methodological and substantive issues in the measurement of self-directed learning readiness. Adult Education Quarterly, 36, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge/Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1985). The continuing educator and self-directed learning in the community. In S. D. Brookfield (Ed.), Self-directed learning: Theory to practice. New directions for continuing education (pp. 75–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1996). Adult learning: An overview. In A. C. Tuijnman (Ed.), International encyclopedia of adult education and training (pp. 163–168). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with Amos: Basic concepts, application and programming. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fruyt, F., Bartels, M., Van Leeuwen, K. G., De Clercq, B., Decuyper, M., & Mervielde, I. (2006). Five types of personality continuity in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 538–552. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, F. (1992). Zelfstandig leren. Regulatie van het leerproces en leren reguleren: een procesbenadering [self-regulated learning. Regulation of the learning process and learning to regulate: A process oriented approach]. Tilburg: Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellinger, A. D. (2004). The concept of self-directed learning and its implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 158–177. doi:10.1177/1523422304263327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualising professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. DOI.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. (2017). Bounded agency in professional lives. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 17–36). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 14(1), 97–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, L. (1989). An investigation into the structure, validity, and reliability of Guglielmino’s self-directed learning readiness scale. Adult Education Quarterly, 39, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 133–187). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 271–340). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two german samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goller, M., & Harteis, C. (2017). Human agency at work: Towards a clarification and operationalisation of the concept. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 85–103). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1977. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 6467 A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmino, L. M., & Guglielmino, P. J. (1994). Practical experience with self-directed learning in business and industry human resource development. In R. Hiemstra & R. G. Brockett (Eds.), Overcoming resistance to self-direction in adult learning (pp. 39–46). San-Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harteis, C., & Goller, M. (2014). New skills for new jobs: Work agency as a necessary condition for successful lifelong learning. In S. Billett, T. Halttunen, & M. Koivisto (Eds.), Promoting, assessing, recognizing and certifying lifelong learning: International perspectives and practices (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra, R. (2000). Self-directed learning: The personal responsibility model. In G. A. Straka (Ed.), Conceptions of self-directed learning? Theoretical and conceptual considerations (pp. 93–108). LOS, Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. (1996). Managing and developing a boundaryless career: Lessons from dance and drama. European Journal of Work an Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 617–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning. New York: Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1990). Fostering competence in self-directed learning. In R. Smith & Ass (Eds.), Learning to learn across the life span (pp. 123–136). San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, A., Milligan, C., Fontana, R. P., & Margaryan, A. (2016). Professional learning through everyday work: How finance professionals self-regulate their learning. Vocations and Learning, 9(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, H. B., & Morris, S. S. (1995). Self-directed learning in business and industry: A review of the literature. In H. B. Long & Ass (Eds.), New dimensions in self-directed learning (pp. 367–380). Public Managers Center, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, J. W., Levy, J. J., Park, S. H., Gibson, L. W., & Smith, R. (2009). An investigation of the construct validity of the personality trait of self-directed learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 411–418. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKeracher, D. (2004). Making sense of adult learning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. New York: Guilford Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1991). Learning in adulthood. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto, P., Jackson, D., & Somers, K. (2004). How many principal components? Stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 49, 974–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oddi, L. R. (1984). Development of an instrument to measure self-directed continuing learning (doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(01A), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringels, A., & Claes, R. (2001). Proactieve Persoonlijkheidsschaal. Ontwikkeling en voorlopige validatie [The proactive personality scale. Development and tentative validation]. Gedrag en Organisatie, 14, 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raemdonck, I., Thijssen, J., & Valcke, M. (2005). Self-directedness in learning and career processes. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 10, 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raemdonck, I., Meurant, C., Balasse, J., Jacot, A., & Frenay, M. (2013). Exploring the concept of “self-directedness in learning”: Theoretical approaches and measurement in adult education literature. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. D. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 78–101). London: New Perspectives on Learning and Instruction, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, D. R., & Merriam, S. B. (2005). The self-directed learning process of older, rural adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 55, 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saks, K., & Leijen, A. (2014). Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the e-learning context. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 190–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54, 845–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale, S. (2003). Development of an instrument to measure self-directedness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59 (6A), 1969 (UMI No. 3092836).

    Google Scholar 

  • Straka, G. A. (1999). Perceived work conditions and self-directed learning in the process of work. International Journal of Training and Development, 3(4), 240–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straka, G. A. (2000). Modeling a more-dimensional theory of self-directed learning. In G. A. Straka (Ed.), Conceptions of self-directed learning. Theoretical and conceptual considerations (pp. 171–190). LOS. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tough, A. (1971). The adult’s learning projects. Toronto: Ontario Institute for studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loo, J.B. (2002). Self-management and labor market outcomes. Proceedings of the academy of human resource development: Symposium on self-directed learning and self-management, Honolulu (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED474 323).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhoc, K. C. H., & Chen, G. (2016). Reliability and validity evidence for the self-directed learning scale. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 245–250. Doi/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors like to thank Dr. Nadira Saab for her feedback on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Raemdonck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raemdonck, I., Thijssen, J., de Greef, M. (2017). Self-Directedness in Work-Related Learning Processes. Theoretical Perspectives and Development of a Measurement Instrument. In: Goller, M., Paloniemi, S. (eds) Agency at Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60942-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60943-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics