Abstract
This study explores high school science teachers’ perceptions and current practices of inquiry-based science curriculum and the challenges facing teachers in implementing such a curriculum in three different countries—the Georgia, Israel, and the United States—as a means of identifying instructional barriers to implementation that may be hampering widespread adoption. Science is a discipline in which curriculum designers draw topics from a similar database. Teachers’ perception and practices could reflect global trends as well as the unique characteristics of each of the countries. Data for this qualitative study were collected from 15 high school science teachers in each of the three countries using semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate a gap between teachers’ desire and capacity to effectively implement an inquiry-based science curriculum. Common barriers to implementation mentioned by teachers in the three countries included a lack of time, official exams, and class size. Other country-specific reasons included lack of materials in the Georgian language or English language barriers in highly diverse classrooms in the United States. In order to make changes in the curriculum and create more opportunities for implementing an inquiry-based science curriculum, all obstacles identified by teachers should be taken into consideration. Potential interventions could include professional development, mentoring, and developing assessment tools for inquiry-based implementation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
ASCD. (2016). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. http://www.ascd.org/Default.asp
Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. (2015). Innovative approaches in teaching and learning: An introduction to inquiry-based learning for multidisciplinary programs. In P. Blessinger & J. Carfora (Eds.), Inquiry-based learning for multidisciplinary programs (1st ed., pp. 3–22). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Cullen, R., Harris, M., & Hill, R. (2012). The learner-centered curriculum. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Day, J., Foley, L., Groeneweg, R., & Mast, C. (2004). Enhancing the classroom learning experience with web lecture. Georgia Institute of Technology, GVU Technical Report, pp. 1–11.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
Doyle, T. (2011). Learner centered teaching, putting the research on learning into practice. Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Ebert, E. S., II, Ebert, C., & Bentley, M. L. (2013). The educator’s field guide. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355–385.
Freire, P. (1970). The pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.
Jones, L. (2007). The student centered classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kanter, D. E., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2010). The impact of a project-based science curriculum on minority student achievement, attitudes, and careers: The effects of teacher content and pedagogical content knowledge and inquiry-based practices. Retrieved November 20, 2016, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.20391/full
Kapanadze, M., Janashia, S., & Eilks, I. (2010). From science education in the soviet time, via national reform initiatives, towards an international network to support inquiry-based science education – The case of Georgia and the project SALiS. In I. Eilks & B. Ralle (Eds.), Contemporary science education (pp. 237–242). Aachen: Shaker.
Lalor, A. (2016). Ensuring high-quality curriculum: How to design, revise, or adopt curriculum aligned to student success. Published by The Association for Supervision & Curriculum (ASCD).
Martin-Kniep, G. (1999). Capturing the wisdom of practice: Professional portfolio for educators. Published by The Association for Supervision & Curriculum (ASCD) Development.
MED(a) – Ministry of Education of Israel. (2013). Retrieved November 20, 2016, from http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/minhalcalcala/facts.pdf
MED(b) – Ministry of Education of Israel. Retrieved November 20, 2016., from http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/LemidaMashmautit/mashmautit/HagdaraMashmautit.htm
MES – Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia. Retrieved November 16, 2016., from http://www.mes.gov.ge/?lang=eng
Miller, S. (2016). Implementations of the 4Cs of 21st century learning skills within the blended coaching model. A doctoral dissertation completed at Brandon University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 10119299.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science edcuation standards 1996. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html
NAEC – National Assessment and Examinations Centre. Retrieved September 15, 2016., from http://www.naec.ge/#/en/index
NCP – The Portal of National Curriculum. Retrieved September 15, 2016., from http://ncp.ge/en/home
NGSS – Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved October 22, 2016., from http://www.nextgenscience.org
NSES – National Science Education Standards. Retrieved October 10, 2016., from http://www.csun.edu/science/ref/curriculum/reforms/nses/
PDE – Pennsylvania Department of Education. http://www.education.pa.gov/Pages/default.aspx#tab-1
SDP – School District of Philadelphia. http://www.philasd.org/about/
Sheety, A., & Rademacher, N. (2015). Inquiry-based learning as foundational pedagogical tool for critical examination of social justice in theory and practice. In P. Blessinger & J. Carfora (Eds.), Inquiry-based learning for multidisciplinary programs (1st ed., pp. 119–137). Bingley: Emerald, Pages.
Shope, F., & McComas, W. (2015, October 13). Modeling scientific inquiry to guide students in the practices of science: The ED3U teaching model of conceptual change in action. In Inquiry-Based Learning for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators, pp. 217–240. Permanent link to this document: 10.1108/S2055-364120150000004013. Retrieved April 26, 2016, At: 08:16 (PT).
Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., & Chambers, J. C. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165–178.
Slovinsky, E. (2012, August). SALiS and educational policy in Georgia. Proceedings of the student active learning in science final conference, Tbilisi.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills; learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.
Tyler, R. (1957). The curriculum then and now. Proceedings of the 1956 invitational conference on testing problems. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
USDE – United States Department of Education. Overview mission. Retrieved October 16, 2016., from http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/mission/mission.html
WDE – World Data on Education, VII ED. (2010/2011). Retrieved September 15, 2016., from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/WDE/2010/pdf-versions/Georgia.pdf
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner centered teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sheety, A., Kapanadze, M., Joubran, F. (2018). High School Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding Inquiry-Based Science Curriculum in the United States, Georgia, and Israel. In: Roofe, C., Bezzina, C. (eds) Intercultural Studies of Curriculum. Intercultural Studies in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60897-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60897-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60896-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60897-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)