Skip to main content

Syntactic Complexity of Bifix-Free Languages

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Implementation and Application of Automata (CIAA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10329))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study the properties of syntactic monoids of bifix-free regular languages. In particular, we solve an open problem concerning syntactic complexity: We prove that the cardinality of the syntactic semigroup of a bifix-free language with state complexity n is at most \((n-1)^{n-3}+(n-2)^{n-3}+(n-3)2^{n-3}\) for \(n \geqslant 6\). The main proof uses a large construction with the method of injective function. Since this bound is known to be reachable, and the values for \(n \leqslant 5\) are known, this completely settles the problem. We also prove that \((n-2)^{n-3} + (n-3)2^{n-3} - 1\) is the minimal size of the alphabet required to meet the bound for \(n \geqslant 6\). Finally, we show that the largest transition semigroups of minimal DFAs which recognize bifix-free languages are unique up to renaming the states.

M. Szykuła—Supported in part by the National Science Centre, Poland under project number 2014/15/B/ST6/00615.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berstel, J., Perrin, D., Reutenauer, C.: Codes and Automata. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brzozowski, J.A.: Quotient complexity of regular languages. J. Autom. Lang. Comb. 15(1/2), 71–89 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brzozowski, J.A.: In search of the most complex regular languages. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 24(6), 691–708 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Brzozowski, J.A., Li, B.: Syntactic complexity of \(R\)- and \(J\)-trivial languages. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 16(3), 547–563 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brzozowski, J.A., Li, B., Liu, D.: Syntactic complexities of six classes of star-free languages. J. Autom. Lang. Comb. 17, 83–105 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Brzozowski, J.A., Li, B., Ye, Y.: Syntactic complexity of prefix-suffix-, bifix-, and factor-free regular languages. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 449, 37–53 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Brzozowski, J., Szykuła, M.: Upper bounds on syntactic complexity of left and two-sided ideals. In: Shur, A.M., Volkov, M.V. (eds.) DLT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8633, pp. 13–24. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09698-8_2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brzozowski, J.A., Szykuła, M.: Large aperiodic semigroups. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 26(07), 913–931 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Brzozowski, J., Szykuła, M.: Upper bound on syntactic complexity of suffix-free languages. In: Shallit, J., Okhotin, A. (eds.) DCFS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9118, pp. 33–45. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19225-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Brzozowski, J.A., Tamm, H.: Theory of átomata. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 539, 13–27 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Brzozowski, J., Ye, Y.: Syntactic complexity of ideal and closed languages. In: Mauri, G., Leporati, A. (eds.) DLT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6795, pp. 117–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22321-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferens, R., Szykuła, M.: Complexity of bifix-free languages. In: Carayol, A., Nicaud, C. (eds.) CIAA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10329, pp. 76–88. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holzer, M., König, B.: On deterministic finite automata and syntactic monoid size. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 327, 319–347 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Iván, S., Nagy-György, J.: On nonpermutational transformation semigroups with an application to syntactic complexity (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.7289

  15. McNaughton, R., Papert, S.A.: Counter-free automata (M.I.T. Research Monograph No. 65). The MIT Press (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Myhill, J.: Finite automata and representation of events. Wright Air Development Center Technical report, pp. 57–624 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pin, J.E.: Syntactic semigroups. In: Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Languages, Volume 1 Word, Language, Grammar, pp. 679–746. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Szykuła, M., Wittnebel, J.: Syntactic complexity of bifix-free languages (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.06936

  19. Yu, S.: State complexity of regular languages. J. Autom. Lang. Comb. 6, 221–234 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Szykuła .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Szykuła, M., Wittnebel, J. (2017). Syntactic Complexity of Bifix-Free Languages. In: Carayol, A., Nicaud, C. (eds) Implementation and Application of Automata. CIAA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10329. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60134-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60134-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60133-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60134-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics