Skip to main content

What Is New and What Is Different in Recent Guidelines on Antihypertensive Treatment? Looking Forward to Guidelines Reappraisal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disorders of Blood Pressure Regulation

Part of the book series: Updates in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection ((UHCP))

  • 1924 Accesses

Abstract

Some of the questions the physician is confronted with in daily practice have not received a definite answer by suitable intervention trials, and this is reflected in the vague and weak recommendations given on these questions by most guidelines. The most important of these questions concern (1) initiating drug treatment in individuals with grade 1 hypertension and low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk and (2) the systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) targets to be achieved by treatment.

In the absence of specific trial evidence, meta-analyses have recently been done after stratifying available blood pressure-lowering randomized trials according to baseline (untreated) SBP/DBP or SBP/DBP achieved by treatment. Thanks to these meta-analyses, the recommendations given in 2013 by all major guidelines to initiate drug treatment in grade 1 hypertensives independent of the cardiovascular risk level can now be placed on a much firmer ground. Additionally, the statement can be made that achieving SBP values lower than 130 mmHg and DBP lower than 80 mmHg appear safe, at least in uncomplicated hypertensives, and can be associated with some further benefit provided addition of drugs or dose increase is not incrementing adverse events and, consequently, the risk of permanent treatment discontinuations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. (1977) Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. A co-operative study. JAMA 237:255–261

    Google Scholar 

  2. Report of a WHO Expert Committee (1978) Arterial hypertension. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 628:7–56

    Google Scholar 

  3. European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines Committee (2003) 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 21:1011–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A et al (2007) 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 25:1105–1187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A et al (2007) 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 28:1462–1536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K et al (2013) 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 31:1281–1357

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K et al (2013) 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 34:2159–2219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension (2013) 2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC task force for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 31:1925–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL et al (2014) 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA 311:507–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber MA, Schiffrin EL, White WB et al (2014) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community: a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 32:3–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weber MA, Schiffrin EL, White WB et al (2014) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community: a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. J Clin Hypertens 16:14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zanchetti A (2014) What format for hypertension guidelines: a challenge for authors and users. J Hypertens 32:1–2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zanchetti A (2011) Evidence and wisdom: recommendations for forthcoming guidelines. J Hypertens 29:1–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A (2014) Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 1. Overview, meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens 32:2285–2295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A (2016) Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment: 6. Prevention of heart failure and new-onset heart failure—meta-analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens 34:373–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A (2015) Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 5. Head-to-head comparisons of various classes of antihypertensive drugs. Overview and meta-analyses. J Hypertens 33:1321–1341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR et al (2003) Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension 42:1206–1252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. ALLHAT officers and co-ordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group (2002) Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 288:2981–2997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Hypertension (CG127): clinical management of primary hypertension in adults. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG127

  20. Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR et al (2005) Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required vs. atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA) a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366:895–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zanchetti A, Grassi G, Mancia G (2009) When should antihypertensive drug treatment be initiated and to what levels should systolic blood pressure be lowered? A critical reappraisal. J Hypertens 27:923–934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Diao D, Wright JM, Cundiff DK et al (2012) Pharmacotherapy for mild hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD006742

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zanchetti A (2015) Do we over treat mild hypertension? Expert Opin Pharmacother 16:1121–1126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sundström J, Arima H, Jackson R et al (2015) Effects of blood pressure reduction in mild hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 162:184–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A (2014) Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 2. Effects at different baseline and achieved blood pressure levels. Overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens 32:2296–2304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lonn EM, Bosch J, López-Jaramillo P et al (2016) Blood-pressure lowering in intermediate-risk persons without cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 374:2009–2020

    Google Scholar 

  27. López-Jaramillo P, Coca A, Sanchez R et al (2016) Hypertension guidelines: is it time to reappraise blood pressure thresholds and targets? Position of the Latin American Society of Hypertension. Hypertension 68:257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. The SPRINT Research Group (2015) A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med 373:2103–2116

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zanchetti A, Liu L, Mancia G et al (2016) Continuation of the ESH-CHL-SHOT trial after publication of the SPRINT: rationale for further study on blood pressure targets of antihypertensive treatment after stroke. J Hypertens 34:393–396

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kjeldsen SE, Lund-Johansen P, Nilsson PM et al (2016) Unattended blood pressure measurements in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial: implications for entry and achieved blood pressure values compared with other trials. Hypertension 67:808–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A (2016) Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 7. Effects of more versus less intensive blood pressure lowering and different achieved blood pressure levels—updated overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens 34:613–622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A (2016) Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 8. Outcome reductions versus discontinuations because of adverse drug events—meta-analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens 34:1451–1463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG et al (1998) Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomized trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet 351:1755–1762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998) Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 317:703–713

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zanchetti A, Liu L, Mancia G et al (2014) Blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol targets for prevention of recurrent strokes and cognitive decline in the hypertensive patient: design of the European Society of Hypertension- Chinese Hypertension League Stroke in Hypertension Optimal Treatment randomized trial. J Hypertens 32:1888–1897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Zanchetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zanchetti, A. (2018). What Is New and What Is Different in Recent Guidelines on Antihypertensive Treatment? Looking Forward to Guidelines Reappraisal. In: Berbari, A., Mancia, G. (eds) Disorders of Blood Pressure Regulation. Updates in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59918-2_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59918-2_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59917-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59918-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics