Abstract
After the partial collapse of Roman Point residential tower in London in 1968, the tensile catenary, or the known tie-forces’ method, is the norm for robustness check of building in risk classes A and B2 of the Eurocodes. This method is discussed here in light with recent developments in testing and simulation. It is shown that this principle can be further improved, for example it can be proven that the tie-forces are inefficient for the corner assemblies, and without sufficient lateral stiffness, it increases the risk of pull-down of other parts of the structure.
The risk index, informative in the code, is discussed focusing on probability of structural failure as a result of structural damage. The index can be extended to cover structural robustness against disproportionate progressive collapse. It is found that if uncertainty in model is considered, the index becomes inconsistent. A modification is proposed and supported by example limit-state functions appropriate for the new purpose.
Along the line of structural robustness, disaster-safety can be considered. Bearing economy in mind, development is promoted for the informative part of the code. While clue is available that engineered structures preserve certain level of structural robustness, need for research is called for. In this call, unavoidable progressive collapse can be delayed giving users chance to escape which eliminates lives’ risk under collapse.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, J.W., Schubert, M., Faber, M.H.: On the assessment of robustness. Struct. Saf. 30(3), 253–267 (2008)
CEN. Eurocode - Basis of structural design. Brusseles: European Committee for Standardization, EN 1990:2002 (2002)
CEN. Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures: Part 1–7: Accidental Actions. Brussels: European Committe for Standardization, EN 1991-1-7:2006 (2006)
CEN. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committe for Standardization, Brussels (2004a)
CEN. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committe for Standardization, Brusseles, EN 1998-1:2004 (E) (2004b)
Hatahet, T.: On the analysis of the disproportionate structural collapse in RC buildings. Weimar: Bauhause-Universitaet Weimar, Ph.D. Thesis (2016)
Hatahet, T., Könke, C.: Rational Framework for Probability of Collapse in Buildings. ASCE-ICVRAM-ISUMA 2014. Liverpol (2014a)
Hon, J.: Hotel New World Collapse. Times Books International, Singapore (1987)
Lalkovski, N., Starossek, U.: Vertical building collapse triggered by loss of all columns in the ground story − last line of defense. Int. J. Steel Struct. 16(2), 395–410 (2016)
Li, Y., Lu, X., Guan, H., Ye, L.: Improved tie force method for progressive collapse resistance design of RC frame structures. Eng. Struct. 33(10), 2931–2942 (2011)
Morone, D.J., Sezen, H.: Simplified collapse analysis using data from building experiment. ACI Struct. J. 11(4), 925–934 (2014)
Sasani, M.: Response of a reinforced concrete infilled-frame structure to removal of two adjacent columns. Eng. Struct. 30, 2478–2491 (2008)
Sasani, M., Sagiroglu, S.: Gravity load redistribution and progressive collapse resistance of 20-story reinforced concrete structure following loss of interior column. ACI Struct. J. 107(6), 636–644 (2010)
UFC, 4.-0.-0. Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive collapse. Washington, DC: Change 3, 1 November 2016 Unified Facilities Criterion, Department of Defence, USA, 14 July 2016. http://www.wbdg.org/ffc/dod
Wieczorek, G., Larsen, M., Eaton, L., Morgan, B., Blair, J.L.: Debris-flow and flooding hazards associated with the December 1999 storm in coastal Venezuela and strategies for mitigation. USGS Publications Warehouse - U.S. Geological Survey, Open File Report 01-0144 (2016). http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0144/. Accessed 2001
Team Fortress Wikipedia. Sampoong Department Store collapse (2016). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampoong_Department_Store_collapse
Xiao, Y., Kunnath, S., Li, F.W., Zhao, Y.B., Lew, H.S., Bao, Y.: Collapse test of three-story half-scale reinforced concrete frame building. ACI Struct. J. 112(4), 429–438 (2015)
Acknowledgements
This work is financially supported by the German Academic Exchange Service through the international Ph.D. individual scholarship program number 91540867, and the through German research foundation funding of the research training group GRK1462.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hatahet, T., Könke, C. (2018). On the Disproportionate Collapse Risk and Robustness in the Eurocode. In: Hordijk, D., Luković, M. (eds) High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and Engineering Meet. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59471-2_179
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59471-2_179
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59470-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59471-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)