Skip to main content

Clinical Evaluation and Diagnostic Tools in Women with Prolapse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Abstract

A complete evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse needs the investigation of general, gynecological, and obstetric history, the inquiry of the presence of concomitant lower urinary tract symptoms, and a careful physical and instrumental examination.

  1. 1.

    Family history

  2. 2.

    Past medical history

  3. 3.

    Present medical history

  4. 4.

    Physical examination and POP quantification

  5. 5.

    Imaging and instrumental examination

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lince SL, van Kempen LC, Vierhout ME, et al. A systematic review of clinical studies on hereditary factors in pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(10):1327–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kerkhof MH, Hendriks L, Brölmann HA. Changes in connective tissue in patients with pelvic organ prolapse—a review of the currenst literature. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(4):461–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen HY, Chung YW, Lin WY, et al. Collagen type 3 alpha 1 polymorphism and risk of pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;103(1):55–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kluivers KB, Dijkstra JR, Hendriks JC, et al. COL3A1 2209G>A is a predictor of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1113–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun MJ, Cheng YS, Sun R, et al. Changes in mitochondrial DNA copy number and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins in the uterosacral ligaments of premenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55(1):9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eser A, Unlubilgin E, Hizli F, et al. Is there a relationship between pelvic organ prolapse and tissue Fibrillin-1 levels? Int Neurourol J. 2015;19(3):164–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tetzschner T, Sørensen M, Jønsson L, et al. Delivery and pudendal nerve function. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(4):324–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alperin M, Cook M, Tuttle LJ, et al. Impact of vaginal parity and aging on the architectural design of pelvic floor muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. [Epub ahead of print];215:312.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Novellas S, Chassang M, Verger S, et al. MR features of the levator ani muscle in the immediate postpartum following cesarean delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):563–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Laterza RM, Schrutka L, Umek W, et al. Pelvic floor dysfunction after levator trauma 1-year postpartum: a prospective case-control study. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2013;120(2):152–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Glazener C, Elders A, Macarthur C, et al. Childbirth and prolapse: long-term associations with the symptoms and objective measurement of pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG. 2013;120(2):161–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V, et al. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med. 1999;44(8):679–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L, et al. Can sex survive pelvic floor surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(11):1313–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zielinski R, Miller J, Low LK, et al. The relationship between pelvic organ prolapse, genital body image, and sexual health. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Sep;31(7):1145–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Glavind K, Larsen T, Lindquist AS. Sexual function in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(1):80–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nichols DH, Randall CL. Vaginal surgery. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baden WF, Walker TA. Physical diagnosis in the evaluation of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1972;15:1055–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beecham CT. Classification of vaginal relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136(7):957–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Kari B, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, et al. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1037–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haessler AL, Lin LL, Ho MH, et al. Reevaluating occult incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17(5):535–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reena C, Kekre AN, Kekre N. Occult stress incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;97(1):31–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sinha D, Arunkalaivanan AS. Prevalence of occult stress incontinence in continent women with severe genital prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27(2):174–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Migliorini GD, Glenning PP. Bonney’s test—fact or fiction? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;94:157–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ellström Engh AM, Ekeryd A, Magnusson A, et al. Can de novo stress incontinence after anterior wall repair be predicted? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(5):488–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA. Negative Q-tip test as a risk factor for failed incontinence surgery in women. J Reprod Med. 1989;34(3):193–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Santoro GA, Wieczorek CI. Pelvic floor disorders. Berlin: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Santoro GA, Wieczorek CI. Endovaginal ultrasonography: methodology and normal pelvic floor anatomy. Berlin: Springer; 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(1):80–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Broome J. Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(5):511–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dietz HP. Why pelvic floor surgeons should utilize ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(5):629–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Dietz HP, et al. State of the art: an integrated approach to pelvic floor ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(4):381–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tunn R, Petri E. Introital and transvaginal ultrasound as the main tool in the assessment of urogenital and pelvic floor dysfunction: an imaging panel and practical approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(2):205–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Haylen BT. Verification of the accuracy and range of transvaginal ultrasound in measuring bladder volumes in women. Br J Urol. 1989;64(4):350–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dietz HP, Velez D, Shek KL, et al. Determination of postvoid residual by translabial ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(12):1749–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dicuio M, Pomara G, Menchini Fabris F, et al. Measurements of urinary bladder volume: comparison of five ultrasound calculation methods in volunteers. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2005;77(1):60–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lekskulchai O, Dietz HP. Detrusor wall thickness as a test for detrusor overactivity in women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(4):535–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pannu HK, Kaufman HS, Cundiff GW, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics. 2000;20(6):1567–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaufman HS, Buller JL, Thompson JR, et al. Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and cystocolpoproctography alter surgical management of pelvic floor disorders. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1575–83. discussion 1583-1584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, et al. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology. 1991;179:25–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, et al. Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic floor descent. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:1309–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Del Deo, F., Grimaldi, A., Torella, M. (2018). Clinical Evaluation and Diagnostic Tools in Women with Prolapse. In: Li Marzi, V., Serati, M. (eds) Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59195-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59195-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59194-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59195-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics