Skip to main content

Out of Many, One Love? A Comparative Study on the Nature of Sexual Communication in Polyamory and Monogamy in the Caribbean

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interweaving Tapestries of Culture and Sexuality in the Caribbean
  • 491 Accesses

Abstract

In the play called “Society”, all human beings are actors and use communication as their stage. The role of communication in the acts of sexual relationships cannot be understated. This research examines the similarities and differences between sexual self-disclosure within polyamorous and monogamous relationships in the Caribbean. In-depth interviews were conducted with polyamorous and monogamous participants. The key questions were: “what, when and how” sexual communication takes place. The results point to the fact that all intimate relationships have problems and solutions and that value judgments based on the type of intimate relationship are not very helpful. These findings are important for therapists, scholars and participating individuals in helping clients to implement solutions to sexual communication problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E. (2010). “At least with cheating there is an attempt at monogamy”: Cheating and monogamism among undergraduate heterosexual men. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 851–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1986). Exchange and power in social life. (2nd printing). New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., Cooper, D., Getlin, R., Spotnitz, J., Tompkins, P., & Wasson, E. (2009). Assertive sexual communication research group. Retrieved October 16, 2011, from UC Davis Institutional Analysis, Student Research and Information: http://www.sariweb.ucdavis.edu/DavisHonorsChallenge/SexualCommunicationGroup.pdf

  • Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory. The Journal of Sex Research, 35, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, E. S., & Demmons, S. (1999, May). Sexual satisfaction and sexual self-disclosure within dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research. FindArticles http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2372/is_2_36/ai_54882520/pg_5/?tag=content;col1

  • Carroll, J. L. (2010). Sexuality now: Embracing diversity. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney, A. P., Blakeney, P. E., Cole, C. M., & Chan, A. F. (1981). A comparison of couples who have sought sex therapy with couples who have not. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 7, 131–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chias. (2005, December 20). Communicate, communicate, communicate. Retrieved November 2, 2011, from Polyamorous percolations: http://www.polyamoryonline.org/articles/the_third_122005.html#top

  • Comstock, W. R., & Cupach, J. (1990). Satisfaction with sexual communication in marriage: Links to sexual satisfaction and dyadic adjustment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, L., & Constantine, J. (1973). Group marriage. New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., & Rice, E. (2006). Social exchange theory. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 53–76). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I., & Cowley, S. (2006). Using grounded theory to research parent participation. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11, 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. (2009). Society and change. In J. M. Charon & L. G. Vigilant (Eds.), The meaning of sociology (pp. 345–347). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1991). Sexuality and communication in close relationships. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dye, J. F., Schatz, I. M., Rosenberg, B. A., & Coleman, S. T. (2000). Constant comparison method: A kaleidoscope of data. The Qualitative Report, 4(1/2). http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-1/dye.html

  • Fang, B. (1976). Swinging: In retrospect. The Journal of Sex Research, 12, 220–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferroni, P., & Taffee, J. (1997). Women’s emotional well-being: The importance of communicating sexual needs. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 12, 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct. The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, E. (1994). A first look at communication theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habke, A. M., Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1999). Perfectionism and sexual satisfaction in intimate relationships. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21(4), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeberle, E. J. (1981). Sex and society. Retrieved November 15, 2011, from The sex atlas: http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/ATLAS_EN/html/sex_and_society.html

  • Hakobyan, M. (2011). Report on in-depth interviews conducted within the scope of alternative resources in media program. Yerevan: United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Retrieved from http://www.crrccenters.org/store/downloads/projects/ARMedia%20In-depth_Interviews%20Analysis.pdf

  • Haritaworn, J., Lin, C.-J., & Klesse, C. (2006). Poly/logue: A critical introduction to polyamory. Sexualities, 9(5), 515–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior and its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hybels, S., & Weaver, R. L. (2003). Communicating effectively (7th ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. H. (1997). Alfred C. Kinsey: A public/private life. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. L., & Hostler, R. (2002, Summer). Sexual script theory: An integrative exploration of the possibilities and limits of sexual self-definition. Journal of Psychology and Theology. FindArticles http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6566/is_2_30/ai_n28929896/

  • Kimmel, M. (2007). The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts. Tennessee: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klesse, C. I. (2006). Expert interview: The trials and tribulations of being a ‘slut’ – Ethical, psychological, and political thoughts on polyamory. Sexualities, 9, 643–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., & Gagnon, J. H. (1995). A sociological perspective on sexual action. In R. G. Parker & J. H. Gagnon (Eds.), Conceiving sexuality: Approaches to sex research in a postmodern world (pp. 183–213). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoPiccolo, L., & LoPiccolo, L. (1978). Handbook of sex therapy. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S. (2005). Dyadic assessment of sexual self-disclosure and sexual. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S. (2009). Role of sexual self-disclosure in the sexual satisfaction of long-term heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, K., & Sprecher, S. (1991). Sexuality in close relationships. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesi, J. L., Fauber, R. L., Gordon, E. A., & Heimberg, R. G. (2010). The specific importance of communicating about sex to couples’ sexual and overall relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 28, 591–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbuch, T., & Harvey, J. (1991). Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of sexuality in close relationships. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 9–21). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegasus, & Man, R. (2006, January 8). Laying the groundwork: Communication. Retrieved November 2, 2011, from Polyamorous percolation: http://www.polyamoryonline.org/articles/looking_for_archives.html#top

  • Polyamory Society. (2011). Introduction to polyamory. Retrieved October 29, 2011, from Polyamory Society: http://www.polyamorysociety.org/page6.html

  • Reiss, I. L. (1989). Society and sexuality: A sociological explanation. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 3–29). Norwood: Ablex Pub. Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, L. (1990). Sex and couples therapy: A method of treatment to enhance physical and emotional intimacy. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 16, 111–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, T., & Bursik, K. (2007). The value of monogamy in emerging adulthood: A gendered perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 819–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P., & Ogilvy, J. (1979). The emergent paradigm: Changing patterns of thought and belief. Analytic report no. 7, Values and the life style program. Menlo Park: SR1 International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheff, E. (2005). Polyamorous women, sexual subjectivity and power. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34(3), 251–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. (1987). A sexual scripts approach. In J. H. Geer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 363–383). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skloot, R. (2010). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell Jr., D. W. (1997, February 17). The sexual self-disclosure scale (SSDS). Retrieved from Southeast Missouri State University: http://www4.semo.edu/snell/scales/SSDS.htm

  • Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., & O’Connor, W. (2003). Analysis: Practices, principles and processes. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 199–218). London/New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, P. (2003). Monogamy myth: A personal handbook for recovering from affairs. New York: Newmarket Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeless, L. R., Wheeless, V. W., & Baus, R. D. (1984). Sexual communication, communication satisfaction, and solidarity in the developmental stages of intimate relationships. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffon R. K. Campbell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, S.R.K. (2017). Out of Many, One Love? A Comparative Study on the Nature of Sexual Communication in Polyamory and Monogamy in the Caribbean. In: Carpenter, K. (eds) Interweaving Tapestries of Culture and Sexuality in the Caribbean. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58816-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics