Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pressure Drop—Empirical Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Multiphase Flow

Part of the book series: Zurich Lectures on Multiphase Flow ((ZLMF))

  • 2617 Accesses

Abstract

Void fraction is a quantity of primary importance in the design and analysis of two-phase systems. The pressure gradient in two-phase flow is present in the momentum conservation equation; at steady state, it has three components , the gravity, acceleration and friction terms. The first two can be computed in a straightforward way if the void fraction distribution in the duct is known. The frictional pressure gradient requires further modelling and the largest part of the chapter is devoted to this. Traditionally, the frictional pressure gradient (or frictional pressure drop) in two-phase flows has been obtained using a reference pressure gradient (based on the flow in the pipe of one of the phases alone) corrected for the presence of two-phase flow by a multiplier. Martinelli introduced this method that is still widely used today long time ago.

The simplest way to compute the pressure drop in two-phase flow is when one uses the homogeneous model but this is generally not sufficiently accurate. A number of the numerous correlation methods that have been proposed over the years for the frictional multiplier are reviewed and the most often used ones discussed. Comparisons about the quality of the predictions by various correlations are presented. At the end of the chapter, there is a special section devoted to the methods used in the petroleum industry for large pipes . There is also a brief general discussion on the pressure drop in piping singularities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    we recall that the static pressure is different from the total pressure, i.e. the pressure measured where the fluid is brought to rest.

References

  • Aggour MA, Al-Yousef HY (1996) Vertical multiphase flow correlations for high production rates and large tubulars. SPE Prod Facil 11(01):41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed WH, Ching CY, Shoukri M (2007) Pressure recovery of two-phase flow across sudden expansions. Int J Multiphase Flow 33:575–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzi A, Belaadi S, Friedel L (1999) Two-phase gas/liquid flow pressure loss in bends. Forsch Ingenieurwes 65(7):309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroczy CJ (1965) A systematic correlation for two-phase pressure drop. Chem Engng Prog Symp Series, 62:232–249 (1966). Also NAA-SR-MEMO-11858

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie DHH, Whalley PB (1982) A simple two-phase frictional pressure drop calculation method. Int J Multiphase Flow 8:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie DR (1973) A note on the calculation of two-phase pressure losses. Nucl Eng Des 25(3):395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggs HD, Brill JP (1973) A study of two-phase flow in inclined pipes. J Petr Technol 725:607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnia M (1991) Most accurate two-phase pressure-drop correlation identified. Oil Gas J (United States) 89(37): 91–95 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chexal B, Merilo M, Maulbetsch J, Horowitz J, Harrison J, Westacott J, Peterson C, Kastner W, Schmidt H (1997) Void fraction technology for design and analysis. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Chexal B, Horowitz J, McCarthy G, Merilo M, Sursock JP, Harrison J, Peterson C, Shatford J, Hughes D, Ghiaasiaan M, Dhir V (1999) Two-phase pressure drop technology for design and analysis. Technical Report, Electric Power Research Institute Inc., Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm D (1967) A theoretical basis for the Lockhart-Martinelli correlation for two-phase flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf 10(12):1767–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm D (1983) Two-phase flow in pipelines and heat exchangers. George Godwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm D (1973) Pressure gradients due to friction during the flow of evaporating two-phase mixtures in smooth tubes and channels. Int J Heat Mass Transf 16:347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchitti A et al (1960) Two-phase cooling experiments – pressure drop, heat transfer and burnout measurements. Energia Nucleare 7:407–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson ME, Spedding PL (1995) Measurement and prediction of pressure drop in two-phase flow. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 63(3):262–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedel L (1979) Improved friction pressure drop correlations for horizontal and vertical two phase pipe flow. 3R Int 18(7):485–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedel L (1984) Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory GA (1975) Comparison of methods for the prediction of liquid holdup for upward gas-liquid flow in inclined pipes. Can J Chem Eng 53: 384

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory GA, Mandhane JM, Aziz K (1975) Some design considerations for two-phase flow in pipes. J Can Petr Technol 14(1):65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn AR, Brown KE (1964) The effect of viscosity on two-phase vertical flow. J Petrol Tech 16:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harshe B, Hussian A, Weisman J (1976) Two-phase pressure drop across restrictions and other abrupt area changes. Cincinnati Univ, Ohio (USA), Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering report PB-251915 (1976 Apr 01), DOE Contract Number: AT(49–24)–0179

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan AR, Kabir CS (1988) A study of multiphase flow behavior in vertical wells. SPE Prod Eng 3(02):263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetsroni G (1982) Handbook of Multiphase Systems. Hemisphere, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Idsinga W, Todreas N, Bowring R (1977) An assessment of two-phase pressure drop correlations for steam-water systems. Int J Multiph Flow 3:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart RW, Martinelli RC (1949) Proposed correlation of data for isothermal two-phase, two-component flow in pipes. Chem Eng Prog 45(1):39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane DR (1966) An analytic study of the transient boiling of sodium in reactor coolant channels. ANL-7222, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli RC, Boelter LK, Taylor TH, Thomsen EG, Morrin EH (1944) Isothermal pressure drop for two-phase two-component flow in a horizontal pipe. Trans ASME 66(2):139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Modisette JL (1983) Two-phase flow in pipelines-I: Steady-state flow. J Energy 7(6):502–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami M, Shimizu Y (1973) Studies on the hydraulic loss in pipe bends. Jpn Soc Mech Eng 16:981–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens WS (1961) Two-phase pressure gradient. International Developments in Heat Transfer, Part II, ASME

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannak BA (2008) Frictional pressure drop of gas liquid two-phase flow in pipes. Nucl Eng Des 38(12):3277–3284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Griffith P (1970) Determination of the pressure drop optimum pipe size for a two-phase slug flow in an inclined pipe. J Eng Ind 92:717–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J, Friedel L (1997) Two-phase pressure drop across sudden contractions in duct areas. Int J Multiph Flow 23:283–299

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spedding PL, Chen JJJ, Nguyen VT (1982) Pressure drop in two-phase gas-liquid flow in inclined pipes. Int J Multiph Flow 8:407–431

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spedding PL, Hand NP (1997) Prediction in stratified gas-liquid co-current flow in horizontal pipelines. Int J Heat Mass Transf 40(8):1923–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spedding PL, Bénard E, Donnelly GF (2006) Prediction of pressure drop in multiphase horizontal pipe flow. Int Comm Heat Mass Transf 33(9):1053–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taitel Y, Dukler AE (1976) A model for predicting flow regime transitions i n horizontal and near horizontal gas-liquid flow. AIChE J 22:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapucu A, Teyssedou A, Troche N, Merilo M (1989) Pressure losses caused by area changes in a single-channel flow under two-phase flow conditions. Int J Multiph Flow 15:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom JRS (1964) Prediction of pressure drop during forced circulation boiling of water. Int J Heat Mass Transf 7:709–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayan PK, Patil AP, Pilkhwal DS, Saha D, Raj VV (2000) An assessment of pressure drop and void fraction correlations with data from two-phase natural circulation loops. Heat Mass Transf 36(6):541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis GB (1969) One dimensional two phase flow. McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Emeritus of Nuclear Engineering, ETH-Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    George Yadigaroglu

Authors
  1. George Yadigaroglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Yadigaroglu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ETH Zurich , Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland

    George Yadigaroglu

  2. Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London Dept. of Chemical Engineering, London, United Kingdom

    Geoffrey F. Hewitt

Appendix

Appendix

Variation of Baroczy’s property index with temperature for various fluids. Conversion:°F = 32 + °C·9/5

The Thom (1964) multipliers r 2 to r 5 for estimating the pressure drop in a boiling length Conversion bar to psia: 1 bar = 14.504 psia. Explanations in Sect. 6.5.4, Eq. (6.5.16) for diabatic boiling flow and following one for adiabatic flow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yadigaroglu, G. (2018). Pressure Drop—Empirical Methods. In: Yadigaroglu, G., Hewitt, G. (eds) Introduction to Multiphase Flow. Zurich Lectures on Multiphase Flow. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58718-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58718-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58717-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58718-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation