Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Making Sense of ‘Making Sense’ in Science Education: A Microgenetic Multiple Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research

Part of the book series: Contributions from Science Education Research ((CFSE,volume 3))

Abstract

Learning is a complex process that may be represented in a number of different models. Researchers in science education have developed a representation of learning that assumes cognition is composed of multiple conceptual resources that are selectively activated in different contexts. This chapter focuses on one multi-element model of learning, the construct of making sense, that is, the formation or modification of a coherent conceptual structure that can be applied across a range of contexts. Data are presented from a microgenetic case study of the learning of two 16–17-year-old students from a secondary school in England across a number of contexts related to forces and dynamics. The analysis focuses on the manner in which the students developed, or failed to develop, coherent arrangements of their available conceptual resources in different contexts. It is argued that a number of factors prevented the students from making sense of a particular context and that the possession of appropriate conceptual resources was a necessary, but insufficient, requirement for the development of an explanation that matched the accepted scientific argument. The notion of coherence is used to examine the students’ organisations of resources, and it is noted that students’ perception of coherence may differ from those of experienced scientists. The chapter concludes with a call for further research into the factors that drive students’ perceptions of appropriate fit within structures of conceptual resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amin, T. G., Smith, C., & Wiser, M. (2014). Student conceptions and conceptual change: Three overlapping phases of research. In N. G. Lederman & S. A. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 57–81). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, R. (2015). Intuition and insight: Two concepts that illuminate the tacit in science education. Studies in Science Education, 51(2), 127–167. http://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2015.1049843

  • Burns, J., Clift, J., & Duncan, J. (1991). Understanding of understanding: Implications for learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(3), 276–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. In B. T. Ward & S. M. Smith (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 209–234). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109–138. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<109::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-7

  • Churchland, P. S. (2004). How do neurons know? Daedalus, 133(1), 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. (2002). Why “conceptual ecology” is a good idea. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 29–60). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A., & Sherin, B. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A., & Wagner, J. F. (2005). What coordination has to say about transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 121–154). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Rushworth, P., Squires, A., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geelan, D. (1997). Epistemological anarchy and the many forms of constructivism. Science & Education, 6(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative reserach. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(7), 52–59. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.19520

  • Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Maestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89–120). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, R. E. (2000). Transfer of learning: Cognition and instruction. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(4), 383–396. http://doi.org/10.1080/0140528810304004

  • Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jegede, O. J., & Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Transcending cultural borders: Implications for science teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17(1), 45–66. http://doi.org/10.1080/0263514990170104

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koponen, I. T., & Huttunen, L. (2013). Concept development in learning physics: The case of electric current and voltage revisited. Science & Education, 22(9), 2227–2254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science & Education, 4(3), 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowrer, R. R., & Klein, S. B. (2001). The transitive nature of contemporary learning theory. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 1–21). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual change: Philosophical perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 530–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parnafes, O. (2012). Developing explanations and developing understanding: Students explain the phases of the moon using visual representations. Cognition and Instruction, 30(4), 359–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patalano, A. L., Chin-Parker, S., & Ross, B. H. (2006). The importance of being coherent: Category coherence, cross-classification, and reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(3), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1979). The chilld’s conception of the world. (J. Tomlinson & A. Tomlinson, Trans.). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redish, E. F. (1999). Millikan lecture 1998: Building a science of teaching physics. American Journal of Physics, 67(7), 562–573. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.19326

  • Reif, F. (2008). Applying cognitive science to education. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Johnston, D. J. (2004). The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums. Science Education, 88(1), 4–16. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20017

  • Rohrlich, F. (1996). The unreasonable effectiveness of physical intuition: Success while ignoring objections. Foundations of Physics, 26(12), 1617–1626. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02282125

  • Sabella, M. S., & Redish, E. F. (2007). Knowledge organization and activation in physics problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 75(11), 1017–1029. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.2746359

  • Shermer, M. (2012). The believing brain: From spiritual faiths to political convictions-how we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths. London: Constable & Robinson Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46(6), 606–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2000). Case studies and generalisability: Grounded theory and research in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 469–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2013). Modelling learners and learning in science education: Developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(03), 435–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 1(2), 205–221. http://doi.org/10.1080/0140528790010209

  • Vosniadou, S. (2008). Conceptual change research: An introduction. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International Handbook of research on conceptual change (1st ed., pp. xiii–xxviii). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). The nature of sensemaking. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421303064

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, L. (2001). Knowledge, truth and duty. In M. Steup (Ed.), Knowledge, truth and duty (pp. 235–253). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Richard Brock & Keith S. Taber

Authors
  1. Richard Brock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keith S. Taber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Brock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Kaisa Hahl

  2. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Kalle Juuti

  3. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Jarkko Lampiselkä

  4. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Anna Uitto

  5. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Jari Lavonen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brock, R., Taber, K.S. (2017). Making Sense of ‘Making Sense’ in Science Education: A Microgenetic Multiple Case Study. In: Hahl, K., Juuti, K., Lampiselkä, J., Uitto, A., Lavonen, J. (eds) Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58684-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58685-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation