Skip to main content

Natural Heritage: Quantitative Evaluation of Landscape Scenic Values

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Latin American Heritage

Part of the book series: The Latin American Studies Book Series ((LASBS))

Abstract

Landscape is part of the natural heritage and it has scenic, esthetic and economic values, both from the point of view of tourism and recreation, as well as in terms of the social access to the contemplation and use of such heritage. Scenic values are in fact, natural resources, and as such, high scenic values are scarce, and thus, valuable. In the case of scenic values, it is necessary to apply techniques of quantitative evaluation of such resources, which are closely related to the geomorphological characteristics of the studied region, to use these results in decision-making and priority ranking processes. This paper presents various techniques of quantitative evaluation which may be applied at the local and regional level. A case study in Tierra del Fuego is herein described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumol WJ, Blinder AS (2003) Microeconomics. Principles and policy. (9th edn) Thomson, South-western, 480 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley S, Workman W, Williams N (1986) Estimating amenity values of urban fringe farmland: a contingent valuation approach: note. Growth Change 17(4):70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borla ML (1995) Tierra del Fuego: a case for the development of a new methodology for the inventory and evaluation of nature-oriented tourist assets. Unpublished Master of Arts thesis, Somerset University, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark GL, Feldman MP, Gertler M (2000) The oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press, New York, 742 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates DR (1971) Environmental geomorphology. Publications in Geomorphology, SUNY at Binghamton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke RU, Doornkamp JC (1974) An introduction geomorphology in environmental management. Clarendon Press, Oxford 413 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingson L, Seidl A, Pratt L (2010) A route with a view: the contribution of scenic landscapes to a world heritage site gateway community. Rev Turismo Desenvol 13:631–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead J (1984) Measuring the non-market value of massachusetts agricultural land: a case study. J Northeast Agric Econ Counc 13(1):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (2012) 3G’s for modern geotourism. Geoheritage J 4:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent R (1993) Attributes, features and reasons for enjoyment of scenic routes: a comparison of experts, residents and citizens. Landsc Res 18(2):92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB (1969a) Landscape esthetics. Natural History, New York, pp 35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB (1969b) Quantitative comparison of some aesthetic factors among rivers. U.S. Geological survey. Circular 620:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton DL (1968) The assessment of scenery as a natural resource. Scott Geogr Mag 84:218–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Migón P (2015) Landforms explained—geomorphology and geotourism. 6º argentine congress on geomorphology quaternary studies, ushuaia, april 2015, invited lecture, abstract volume. In: Ponce JF et al. (eds). Editorial Utopías, Ushuaia, p 32

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisawa M (1971) Evaluating riverscapes. In: Coates DR (ed) Environmental geomorphology. Publications in Geomorphology, SUNY Binghamton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ready R, Berger M, Bouquets G (1997) Measuring amenity benefits from farmland: hedonic pricing versus contingent valuation. Growth Change 28(4):438–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger R, Loomis J (1999) The value of ranch open space to tourists: combining observed and contingent behavior. Data Growth Change 30:366–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis K, Garrod G (1993) Valuing landscape: a contingent valuation approach. J Env Manag 37:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is deeply grateful to the organizers of the Symposium at UNESP-Ourinhos for their invitation to be part of it. Likewise, I am willing to use this opportunity to express my deepest gratitude to Profs. Marie Morisawa (deceased) and Donald R. Coates, who were my advisors during a Fulbright Postdoctoral Fellowship, State University of New York at Binghamton, in 1974–1975, because they introduced me to the study of Environmental and Quantitative Geomorphology. Finally, I thank María Laura Borla, M.Sc. (CADIC, Ushuaia) for allowing me to use unpublished data from her Master’s Thesis which has largely enriched this paper, and also to Mariano J. Rabassa, Ph.D. (Universidad Católica Argentina , Buenos Aires), for the discussion of some of the ideas exposed in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Rabassa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rabassa, J. (2018). Natural Heritage: Quantitative Evaluation of Landscape Scenic Values. In: Lopes da Cunha, F., dos Santos, M., Rabassa, J. (eds) Latin American Heritage. The Latin American Studies Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58448-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics