Skip to main content

Magna Carta and a Paradox of Authority

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Magna Carta and New Zealand

Abstract

This chapter provides an account of the authority of Magna Carta, mainly in the British Isles, until it took on a life of its own in New Zealand. The history of its reception, it is argued, is at the same time a history of what has justified its authority. It may have been the “Bible of the Constitution” and a “foundational” document, but like any other authority, its title to be respected has been contingent on continually-changing assumptions and beliefs. Those who have cited it have used it for their own purposes, so that it speaks for them and not for itself. It retains its authority only when and where it can speak for others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentham, Jeremy. 1824. The Book of Fallacies. London: J. and H.L. Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Raoul. 1997. Jack Rakove’s Rendition of Original Meaning. Indiana Law Journal 72: 619–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackstone, William. 1759. The Great Charter and the Charter of the Forest, with Other Authentic Instruments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackstone, William. 1774. Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books, 4 vols. London: W. Strahan. Sixth edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. 2004 [1790]. Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J.H., and H.L.A. Hart (eds.). 2008. Jeremy Bentham. Comment on the Commentaries and A Fragment on Government. L.A. Hart, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, David (ed.). 2015. Magna Carta. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catt, Carrie Chapman. 1908. Address: Mrs. Catt’s International Address. June 15. Ann Lewis Women’s Suffrage Collection. Accessed 26 March 2017. https://lewissuffragecollection.omeka.net/items/show/2201.

  • Coke, Edward. 1642. Second Part of the Institutes of the Lawes of England. London: E[phraim] D[awson], etc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemenceau, Georges. 1891. La Révolution est un bloc. 29 janvier. Assemblée nationale. Accessed 21 March 2017. http://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/decouvrir-l-assemblee/histoire/grands-moments-d-eloquence/georges-clemenceau-29-janvier-1891.

  • Dronke, Peter (ed.). 1988. A History of Western Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Moulin, Pierre. 1631. A Learned Treatise of Traditions. London: Humphrey Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Champs, Emmanuelle. 1999. The Place of Jeremy Bentham’s Theory of Fictions in Eighteenth Century Linguistic Thought. Journal of Bentham Studies 2: 1–28. Accessed 21 March 2017. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/647/1/002__1999__EdChamps_1999.pdf.

  • Dyer, J.B. 2010. Slavery and the Magna Carta in the Development of Anglo-American Constitutionalism. Political Science and Politics 43: 479–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flathman, Richard E. 1980. The Practice of Political Authority. Authority and the Authoritative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Julian H. 1978. John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Lon L. 1967. Legal Fictions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Edward. 2001. God and Reason in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Matthew. 1713. The History of the Common Law of England. London: J. Walthoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, James. 1977 [1656]. The Commonwealth of Oceana. In The Political Works of James Harrington, edited by J.G.A. Pocock, 155–359. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan, or the Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth. London: Andrew Crooke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 2005. A Dialogue Between a Phylosopher and a Student of the Common-Laws of England (1681). In A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student, edited by Alan Cromartie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, Edward. 1904. The Myth of Magna Carta. Independent Review 4 (14): 260–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, John. 1888. An Apology for the Church of England, edited by Henry Morley from the original Latin of 1562. London: Cassell and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw, Zoë. 2015. Empire and After. Accessed 21 March 2017. http://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/empire-and-after

  • Lamont, William M. 1963. Marginal Prynne‚ 1600–1669. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilburne, John. 1998 [1649]. An agreement of the free people of England. In The English Levellers, edited by Andrew Sharp, 179–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, Alexander. 2015. Radicalism and Suffrage. Accessed 22 March 2017. http://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/radicalism-and-suffrage.

  • Lucas, J.R. 1966. The Principles of Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKechnie, William Sharp. 1905. Magna Carta Commentary on the Great Charter of King John. Glasgow: James Maclehose and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Eugene F. (ed.). 1987. David Hume, Essays Moral, Political and Literary. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, David. 2015. Magna Carta: The Bible of the English Constitution or a disgrace to the English nation? Guildford Cathedral, 18 June. Accessed 7 March 2017. https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-150618.pdf.

  • Normanton, H.F. n.d. [1915?]. Magna Carta for Women. High Holborn: Womens’ Freedom League.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael. 1991a. Rationalism in Politics. In Rationalism and Politics and other Essays, edited by Timothy Fuller, 5–42. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael. 1991b. Political Education. In Rationalism and Politics and Other Essays, edited by Timothy Fuller, 43–69. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, Richard, and William Walwyn. 1998 [1646]. A remonstrance of many thousand citizens… In The English Levellers, edited by Andrew Sharp, 33–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, Richard. 1998 [1646]. An arrow against all tyrants. In The English Levellers, edited by Andrew Sharp, 54–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, Thomas. 1776. Common Sense: Addressed to the Inhabitants of America. London and Philadelphia: Almon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, Thomas. 1792. The Rights of Man. Part the Second. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Ch., and L. Olbrechts-Tytecha. 1971. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. 1957. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. (ed.). 1987. Edmund Burke. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pym, John. 1643. A Declaration and Vindication of John Pym Esquire. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughan, Nicole. 2013. Authorities: Conflicts, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, Eleanor. 1948. Address to the United Nations General Assembly. Accessed 29 March 2017. http://www.kentlaw.edu/faculty/bbrown/classes/HumanRightsSP10/CourseDocs/2EleanorRoosevelt.pdf.

  • Rosen, F., and J.H. Burns (eds.). 1983. Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Constitutional Code, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serces, James. 1736. Popery an Enemy to Scripture. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Several hands]. 1998 [1647]. An Agreement of the People for a Firm and Present Peace Upon Grounds of Common Right and Freedom. In The English Levellers, edited by Andrew Sharp, 92–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Andrew (ed.). 1994. Leap into the Dark: The Changing Role of the State in New Zealand since 1984. Auckland: Auckland University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Andrew. 2014. “This is my Body”: Constitutional Traditions in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 12 (2): 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Andrew. 2016. The World, the Flesh and the Devil. The Life and Opinions of Samuel Marsden in England and the Antipodes. Auckland: Auckland University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shippey, Tom. 1988. Little does it quake as it lies on a plate. London Review of Books‚ October 27‚ 10 (19): 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • The English devil: or, Cromwel and his monstrous witch discover’d at White-Hall…. 1660. London: George Horton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, Richard. 1829. An Historical Essay on the Magna Charta of King John... London: John Major.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubbs, James W. 2000. The Common Law Mind: Medieval and Early Modern Conceptions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jeremy (ed.). 1987. “Nonsense upon stilts:” Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walwyn, William. 1989a [1645]. England’s Lamentable Slaverie. In The Writings of William Walwyn, edited by Jack R. McMichael and Barbara Taft, 143–153. Athens GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walwyn, William. 1989b [1649]. The Fountain of Slaunder Discovered. In The Writings of William Walwyn, edited by Jack R. McMichael and Barbara Taft, 349–382. Athens GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walwyn, William. 1989c [1651]. “Juries Justified”; or, A Word of Correction to Mr. Henry Robinson. In The Writings of William Walwyn, edited by Jack R. McMichael and Barbara Taft, 433–445. Athens GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, T.D. 1956. Political Principles. In Philosophy, Politics and Society, edited by Peter Laslett, 22–34. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, David V. 2017. The Treaty of Waitangi: Māori Magna Carta. In The Treaty on the Ground: Where we are Headed, and Why It Matters, edited by Rachael Bell and Peter Meihana, 31–50. Auckland: Massey University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P. 1967 [1958–1959]. Authority. In Political Philosophy: Oxford Readings in Philosophy, edited by A. Quinton, 97–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Sharp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sharp, A. (2017). Magna Carta and a Paradox of Authority. In: Winter, S., Jones, C. (eds) Magna Carta and New Zealand. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58439-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58439-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58438-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58439-3

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics