Skip to main content

People Management in the Public Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
HRM in Mission Driven Organizations

Abstract

This chapter discusses people management in public sector organizations, starting from the idea that it is their mission that makes public organizations different from private organizations. The mission-driven character of public organizations is a key distinctive characteristic that impacts on people management in combination with other distinctive features including the constraints on managerial discretion, perceptions of red tape, and employees’ public service motivation. It is also acknowledged that other specific contextual features should be taken into account as the public sector consists of a variety of organizational settings. This chapter focuses on the generic characteristics that make people management in public organizations distinctive and describes how these impact the effect people management has on societal, organizational, and employee outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2009). Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3), 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. B. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence from the federal sector. American Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, L. B., Heinesen, E. & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). How does public service motivation Among eachers affect student performance in schools? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, first published online January 29, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonsen, M., & Beck Jorgensen, T. (1997). The ‘publicness’ of public organizations. Public Administration, 75, 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, S., & Kessler, I. (2007). Human Resource Management and the New Public Management. In P. Boxall, J. Purcell, & P. Wright (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human resource management (pp. 469–488). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 779–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M., Boselie, P., & Brewster, C. (2015). Back to the future: Implications for the field of HRM of the multistakeholder perspective proposed 30 years ago. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Mills, D., & Walton, R. (1984). Managing human assets. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellé, N. (2013). Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benington, J., & Moore, M. (Eds.). (2011). Public value: Theory and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boselie, P. (2014). Strategic human resource management: A balanced approach. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2011). Strategy and human resource management (3rd ed.). Houndsmill: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, G. (2002). Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: An evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 22(2), 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, G., Jenkins, G., & Poole, M. (1999). Human resource management in the public and private sectors: An empirical comparison. Public Administration, 77(2), 407–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L., & Walker, R. M. (2006). Public service performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (1993). A theory of government ‘red tape’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 273–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. (2008). Employee and organizational performance. In J. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 136–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. (2010). Public service motivation and performance. In R. Walker, G. Boyne & G. Brewer (Eds.), Public management and performance: Research directions (pp. 152–177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. (2013). Public management contributions for improving social service performance: public values, public service motivation and rule functionality. In P. Leisink, P. Boselie, M. Van Bottenburg, & D. Hosking (Eds.), Managing social issues: A public values perspective (pp. 19–36). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G., & Walker, R. (2010a). Red tape: The bane of public organizations? In R. Walker, G. Boyne, & G. Brewer (Eds.), Public management and performance: Research directions (pp. 110–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G., & Walker, R. (2010b). The impact of red tape on governmental performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, C., Brookes, M., & Gollan, P. (2014). The institutional antecedents of the assignment of HRM responsibilities to line managers. Human Resource Management, 54(4), 577–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. L. (2010). The evolution of public sector strategy. Public Administration Review, 70(s1), s212–s214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetto, Y., Farr-Wharton, R., & Shacklock, K. (2011). Using the Harvard HRM model to conceptualise the impact of changes to supervision upon HRM outcomes for different types of Australian public sector employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(3), 553–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaing, S. (2006). The effects of psychological contract fulfilment and public service motivation on organizational commitment in the French civil service. Public Policy and Administration, 21(1), 84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, Y., & Rainey, H. (2005). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 529–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 797–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R., & Lindblom, C. (1953), Politics, economics and welfare, New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., & Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2012). Resigned but satisfied: The negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction. Public Administration, 90(1), 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinch, S., & Wallis, J. (2009). International handbook of public management reform. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gould-Williams, J. (2003). The importance of HR practices and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: A study of public-sector organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 28–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould-Williams, J., Bottomley, P., Redman, T., Snape, E., Bishop, D., Limpanitgul, T., et al. (2014). Civic duty and employee outcomes: Do high commitment human resource practices and work overload matter? Public Administration, 92(4), 937–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould-Williams, J., & Mohamed, R. (2010). A comparative study of the effects of ‘best practice’ HRM in worker outcomes in Malaysia and England local government. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(5), 653–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (2002). Contemporary strategy analysis: Concepts, techniques, applications. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, L., & Truss, C. (2003). The three-dimensional people strategy: Putting human resources policies into action. Academy of Management Executive, 17(3), 74–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Abrahamson, E. (1995). Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multimethod approach. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1427–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Straw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A., Marsden, P., Reynolds, J., & Knoke, D. (2006). Beyond profit? Sectoral differences in high-performance work practices. Work and Occupations, 33(3), 271–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. (2008). Sorting out teacher quality. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(1), 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knies, E., Boselie, P., Gould-Williams, J., & Vandenabeele, W. (2015). Special issue of International Journal of Human Resource Management: Strategic human resource management and public sector performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(3), 421–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knies, E., & Leisink, P. L. M. (2014a). Linking people management and extra-role behaviour: results of a longitudinal study. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knies, E., & Leisink, P. L. M. (2014b). Leadership behavior in public organizations: A study of supervisory support by police and medical center middle managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34, 108–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisink, P. L. M. & Bach, S. (2014). Economic crisis and municipal service employment: Comparing developments in seven EU Member States, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 20(3): 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisink, P. L. M., & Steijn, B. (2009). Public service motivation and job performance of public sector employees in The Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Combs, J. G., Ketchen, D. J., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). The value of human resource management for organizational performance. Business Horizons, 50(6), 503–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M. & Hood, C. (2012). Into an age of multiple austerities? Public management and public service bargains across OECD countries. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 25(1): 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDuffie, J. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2), 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messersmith, J. G., Patel, P. C., Lepak, D. P., & Gould-Williams, J. S. (2011). Unlocking the black box: Exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa, A., & Gould-Williams, J. (2014). Testing the mediation effect of person-organization fit on the relationship between high performance HR practices and employee outcomes in the Egyptian public sector. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(2), 276–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa, A., Gould-Williams, J., & Bottomley, P. (2015). High-performance human resource practices and employee outcomes: The mediating role of public service motivation, Public Administration Review, early view, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D., Wright, B., & Pandey, S. (2012). Working within constraints: Can transformational leaders alter the experience of red tape? International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61, 503–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P. C., & Backoff, R. W. (1995). Strategy for public and third-sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Government at a Glance 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2014). Public management, context, and performance: In quest of a more general theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg, L. E., & Lavigna, B. (2010). Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 710–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paauwe, J. (2004). HRM and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paauwe, J. (2009). HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paauwe, J., Boon, C., Boselie, P., & Den Hartog, D. (2013). Reconceptualising fit in strategic human resource management: Lost in translation. In J. Paauwe, D. Guest, & P. Wright (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 61–78). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S., & Moynihan, D. (2006). Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: Testing the moderating role of culture and political support. In G. Boyne, K. Meier, L. O’Toole, & R. Walker (Eds.), Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 130–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Rainey, H. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in US federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 109–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Preface. In J. L. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovsky, N., & Ritz, A. (2014). Public service motivation and performance: A critical perspective. Evidence-Based HRM, 2(1), 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2013). Context in public policy and management: The missing link? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007). Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: Theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J., & Kinnie, N. (2007). HRM and business performance. In P. Boxall, J. Purcell, & P. Wright (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human resource management (pp. 533–551). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, C. (2013). Human resource management in the public sector in developing countries. In R. Burke, A. Noblet, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Human resource management in the public sector (pp. 37–60). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truss, C. (2008). Continuity and change: The role of the HR function in the modern public sector. Public Administration, 86(4), 1071–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truss, C. (2013). The distinctiveness of human resource management in the public sector. In R. Burke, A. Noblet, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Human resource management in the public sector (pp. 17–36). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenabeele, W. (2009). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: More robust evidence of the PSM-performance relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 11–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenabeele, W. (2014). Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2), 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Voorde, K., Paauwe, J., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2012). International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, N., Vandenabeele, W., & Leisink, P. L. M. (2015). On the bright and dark side of public service motivation: Investigating the relationship between PSM and employee wellbeing from an institutional perspective. Public Money and Management, 35(5), 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (2013). Public sector shock: The impact of policy retrenchment in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeeren, B. (2014) HRM implementation and performance in the public sector. Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R., Boyne, G., & Brewer, G. (2010). Public management and performance: Research directions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T. D., & Wood, S. J. (2005). The romance of human resource management and business performance, and the case for big science. Human Relations, 58, 429–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., M. & Nishii, L. H. (2013). Strategic HRM and organizational behaviour: Integrating multiple levels of analysis’. In J. Paauwe, D. Guest, & P. Wright (Eds.), HRM & Performance: Achievements & Challenges, Chichester: Wiley: pp. 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Knies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knies, E., Leisink, P. (2018). People Management in the Public Sector. In: Brewster, C., Cerdin, JL. (eds) HRM in Mission Driven Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57583-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics