Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complications During Hysteroscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hysteroscopy

  • 2508 Accesses

Abstract

Operative hysteroscopy is a mini invasive technique to treat uterine cavity diseases. As surgical technique, even if mini invasive, unfortunately it is not without risks and complications. By technology progresses some of the complications occur less frequently when small barrel hysteroscopes are used, both in operative outpatient procedures and when small barrel resectoscopes are used. The procedure in general has a low risk of adverse effects with an incidence of 0.28% in 13,600 procedures. Indications for endoscopic surgery become wider therefore safety protocols become more important in the prevention of complications. This is particularly important as most complications do occur during the learning curve of the surgeons mastering the technique and in specific procedures, i.e. hysteroscopic myomectomy, where the risk of complications can be as high as 10%. The recommendation is also for hysteroscopic surgery to be graded according to the difficulty. In this chapter, we will discuss on the major and minor complications of hysteroscopic surgery, illustrating by figures and images and discussing on the solutions to reduce and treat complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective multicentre study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:266–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aydeniz B, Walwiener D, Rimbach S. Co-administration of ethanol to the distension medium in surgical hysteroscopy a screening method to prevent fluid overload? A prospective randomized comparative study of ablative versus non-ablative hysteroscopy and various ethanol concentrations. Gynäkol Geburtshilfiche Rundsch. 1995;35:108–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Propst AM, Liberman RF, Harlow BL‘. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:517–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karakus S, Akkar OB, Yildiz C, Yenicesu GI, Cetin M, Cetin A. Comparison of effectiveness of Laminaria versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical preparation before operative hysteroscopy in women of reproductive age: a prospective randomized. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(1):46–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Song T, Kim MK, Kim ML, Jung YW, Yoon BS, Seong SJ. Effectiveness of different routes of misoprostol administration before operative hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(2):519–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Casadei l PE, Manicuti CL, Cardinale S, Collamarini M, Piccione E. Role of vaginal estradiol pre-treatment combined with vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016;59(3):220–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Fozan H, Firwana B, AlKadri H, Hassan S, Tulandi T. Preoperative ripening of the cervix before operative hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD005998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lindemann HJ. The use of CO2 in the uterine cavity for hysteroscopy. Int J Fertil. 1972;17:221.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pellicano M, Guida M, Zullo F‘. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as uterine distension medium for diagnostic hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective randomized multicentre study. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:418–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baggish MS, Daniell JF. Death caused by air embolism with ND:YAG laser surgery and artificial sapphire tips. AM J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:877–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brooks PG. Venous air embolism during operative hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997;4:309–4229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Groenman FA, Peters LW, Rademaker PBM, Bakkum EA. Embolism of air and gas in hysteroscopic procedures: pathophysiology and implication for daily practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:241–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leake JF, Murphy AA, Zacur HA‘. Non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a complication of operative hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;48:497.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McLucas B‘. Hyskon complications in hysteroscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Survey. 1991;46:196–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Witz CA, Silverberb KM, Burns WN, Schenken RS, Olive DC‘. Complications associated with the absorption of hysteroscopic fluid media. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:745–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bauman R, Magos A, Kay JDS, Turnbull AC. Absorption of glycine irrigating solution during trans-cervical resection of the endometrium. Br Med J. 1990;300:304–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. AAGL Practice Report: Prac J Minim Invasive Gynecol tice guidelines for the management of hysteroscopic distending media. 2013; 20:137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Munro MG‘. Complications of hysteroscopic and uterine resectoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2010;37:399–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dua RS, Bankes MJ, Dowd GS. Compartment syndrome following pelvic surgery in the lithotomy position. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:170–1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Grames DA. Diagnostic dilatation and curettage a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;142:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DeCherney A, Diamond MP, Lavy G, Polan ML. Endometrial ablation for intractable uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:668–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Spezio Sardo A, Calagna G, Di Carlo C, Guida M, Perina A, Nappi C‘. Cold loops applied to bipolar resectoscope: a safe “one-step” myomectomy for treatment od submucosal myomas with intramural development. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2015;41(12):1935–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Noventa M, Ancona E, Quaranta M, Vitagliano A, Cosmi E, D’Antona D, Gizzo S. Intrauterine morcellator device: the icon of hysteroscopic future or merely a marketing image? A systematic review regarding safety, efficacy, advantages and contraindications. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(10):1289–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Litta P, Leggieri C, Conte L, Dalla Toffola A, Multinu F, Angioni S. Monopolar vesus bipolar device: safety, feasibility, limits and perioperative complications in performing hysteroscopic myomectomy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41:335–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Munro MG, Christianson LA. Complications of hysteroscopic and uterine resectoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(4):765–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tamman AE, Ahmed HH, Abdella AH, Taha SA. Comparative study between monopolar electrodes and bipolar electrodes in hysteroscopic surgery. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(11):QC11–3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Loffer FD. Removing intrauterine lesions: myomectomy and polypectomy. In: Bieber EJ, Loffer FD, editors. The gynecologic resectoscope. Cambridge: Cambridge Blackwell Scientific; 1994. p. 186–94.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goldrath MU. Uterine tamponade for the control of acute uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147:869–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cooper JM, Bradley RM. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of operative hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2000;27:347–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures (ACOG practice bulletin n° 14). Washington, DC: ACOG; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taskin O., Sadi S., Onoglu A.” Role of endometrial suppression on the frequency of intra uterine adhesion after resectoscopic surgery”. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000; 7:351–354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hill D, Maher P, Wood C. Complications of operative hysteroscopy. Gynaecol Endosc. 1992;1:185–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cook JR, Semal IE. Pregnancy following endometrial ablation: case history and literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58-8:551–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hare A.A, Olah K.S “Pregnancy following endometrial ablation: a review article. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 25:108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Polyzos MP, Mauri D, Tsioras S. Intraperitoneal dissemination of endoemtrial cancer cells after hysteroscopy. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:231–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Creasman WT, Lukerman J.” Role of the fallopian tube dissemination of malignant cells in corpus cancer.” Cancer 1972; 29:456–457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lasters B, van Herendael BJ. Anaesthesia and monitoring in an outpatient set up in ambulatory hysteroscopy diagnosis and treatment. In: Herendael BJ, Valle R, Bettocchi S, editors. , vol. 22. Oxford: Blandon Medical Publishing; 2004. p. 152–60.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Corson SL, Brooks PG, Serden SP, Batzer FR, Godal B. Effect of vasopressin administration during hysteroscopic surgery. J Reprod Med. 1994;39:419–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Endoscopic Surgery, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Varese, Italy

    Bruno J. van Herendael M.D., Ph.D.

  2. Endoscopic Surgery Ziekenhuis Netwerk, Antwerpen, Belgium

    Bruno J. van Herendael M.D., Ph.D.

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Bari, Italy

    Antonio Malvasi M.D.

  4. Laboratory of Human Physiology, Department of Applied Mathematics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia

    Antonio Malvasi M.D.

  5. Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Simona Zaami M.D.

  6. Laboratory of Human Physiology, Department of Applied Mathematics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow State University, Inststitutskii per 9, 141700, Dolgoprudny, Moscow, Russia

    Andrea Tinelli M.D., Ph.D.

  7. Division of Experimental Endoscopic Surgery, Imaging, Technology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Piazza Muratore, 73100, Lecce, Italy

    Andrea Tinelli M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Bruno J. van Herendael M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Malvasi M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simona Zaami M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Tinelli M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Tinelli M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale Vito Fazzi, Lecce, Italy

    Andrea Tinelli

  2. Hysteroscopy Unit, Gutenberg Institute, Malaga, Spain

    Luis Alonso Pacheco

  3. Hysteroscopy Unit, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

    Sergio Haimovich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Herendael, B.J., Malvasi, A., Zaami, S., Tinelli, A. (2018). Complications During Hysteroscopy. In: Tinelli, A., Alonso Pacheco, L., Haimovich, S. (eds) Hysteroscopy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57559-9_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57559-9_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57558-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57559-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation