Skip to main content

Integration of Cultural Heritage into Disaster Risk Management: Challenges and Opportunities for Increased Disaster Resilience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Going Beyond

Part of the book series: Heritage Studies ((HEST))

Abstract

This chapter explores the integration of cultural heritage into the overall framework of DRM, outlines potential challenges and emphasises that, aside from enhancing heritage protection from natural hazards and climate change-related extreme events, this can promote the overall disaster resilience of the social, built and environmental systems to which cultural heritage belongs. The World Heritage Site of ‘Bam and its Cultural Landscape’, as a unique example of a traditional human settlement, is investigated through analysis of its multidimensional values associated with its contribution to post-disaster recovery, development and resilience of the city of Bam following the earthquake in 2003. In drawing upon this example, the integration and contribution of cultural heritage in the DRM framework are discussed through an interdisciplinary review of existing literature. This review demonstrates that despite the opportunities for proactive long-term economic and social coping capacity, potential challenges, primarily in respect to safeguarding heritage values within overall risk reduction policies, may also be generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Disaster risk management is ‘the systematic process of using administrative directives, organisations, and operational skills and capacities to implement strategies, policies and improved coping capacities in order to lessen the adverse impacts of hazards and the possibility of disaster’ (UNISDR 2009).

  2. 2.

    The Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) 2005–2015 ‘Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters’ was adopted in the UN World Conference on Disaster Reduction held on 18–22 January 2005 in Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.

  3. 3.

    ICOMOS-ICORP is the International Scientific Committee on Risk Preparedness of ICOMOS.

  4. 4.

    Disaster risk reduction is ‘The concept and practice of reducing disaster risks through systematic efforts to analyse and manage the causal factors of disasters’ (UNISDR 2009).

  5. 5.

    According to the UN’s report for the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda ‘Realizing the Future We Want for All’, the four core dimensions of sustainability include inclusive social development, environmental sustainability, inclusive economic development and peace and security; according to the report, environmental sustainability may refer to ‘protecting biodiversity’, ‘stable climate’ and ‘resilience to natural hazards’ (UN 2012).

  6. 6.

    The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 was adopted at the Third United Nations World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, held from 14 to 18 March 2015 in Sendai, Japan.

  7. 7.

    Here, Bam refers to the fortified old settlement of Bam (Arg-e Bam) and does not mean the current city of Bam.

  8. 8.

    For more information about the criteria of inscription of Bam and its Cultural Landscape on the WH List, please see http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1208.

  9. 9.

    Bam and its Cultural Landscape was placed on the List of World Heritage in Danger mainly due to massive impact to the site caused by the earthquake in 2003, as well as potential development pressures associated with the post-disaster reconstruction. In 2013, it was removed from the List of World Heritage in Danger.

  10. 10.

    UNISDR (2009) defines resilience as ‘The ability of a system, community or society exposed to hazards to resist, absorb, accommodate to and recover from the effects of a hazard in a timely and efficient manner, including through the preservation and restoration of its essential basic structures and functions’ (UNSIDR 2009).

  11. 11.

    HIA is ‘a process of identifying, predicting, evaluating and communicating the probable effects of a current or proposed development policy or action on the cultural life, institutions and resources of communities … with a view to mitigating adverse impacts and enhancing positive outcomes’ (Sagnia and INCD 2004, p. 6).

  12. 12.

    Sun-dried (unfired) mud brick is called ‘Khesht’ in Iran and has been applied as a local material in the earthen architecture of the city of Bam.

  13. 13.

    Ta’zieh has been inscribed on the Representative List of the UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) of Humanity in 2010. ‘Ta‘zīye (or Ta’azyeh) is a ritual dramatic art that recounts religious events, historical and mythical stories and folk tales’ (UNESCO ICH 2010).

References

  • Alexander, D. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1, 1257–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asgary, A., Badri, A., Rafieian, M., & Hajinejad, A. (2006). Lost and used post-disaster development opportunities in bam earthquake and the role of stakeholders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australia and State of the Environment Committee 2011 (Australia). (2011). Resilience of heritage. Australia state of the environment 2011: An independent report presented to the Australian Government Minister for Sustainability, environment, water, and communities (pp. 780–783). Canberra: Deptartment of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australia ICOMOS. (2000). The Burra charter: The Australia ICOMOS charter for places of cultural significance 1999: With associated guidelines and code on the ethics of co-existence. Burwood: Australia ICOMOS. australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/BURRA_CHARTER.pdf. Accessed Nov 2015.

  • Aysan, Y., & Davis, I. (1993). Rehabilitation and reconstruction, UNDP/DHA Disaster Management Training Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur, A.V., Ibrahim, M., & Tanner, T. (2010). The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters. Report for Strengthening climate resilience. http://community.eldis.org/.59e0d267/resilience-renaissance.pdf. Accessed April 2016.

  • Boccardi, G. (2015). From mitigation to adaptation: A new heritage paradigm for the Anthropocene. In M. Albert (Ed.), Perceptions of sustainability in heritage studies. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosher, L. S. (2014). Built-in resilience through disaster risk reduction: Operational issues. Building Research & Information, 42(2), 240–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, F. S., & Jax, K. (2007). Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: Resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmutina, K., Lizarralde, G., Dainty, A. & Bosher, L. (2014a). “The Multiple Representations of Resilience: Tensions in Practice and Theoretical Debates”, In: Schrentk, M., Popovich, V.V., Zeile, P. and Elisei P. (eds.), Proceeding of RealCorp 2014 Conference, Vienna, Austria, 21–23 May. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmutina, K., Ganor, T. & Bosher, L. (2014b). “The role of urban design and planning in risk reduction: who should do what and when”, Proceedings of ICE – Urban Design and Planning. Vol. 167, No. 3, pp. 125–135. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmutina, K., Lizarralde, G., Dainty, A., & Bosher, L. (2016). Unpacking resilience policy discourse. Cities, 58, 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drdacky, M. (2007). Protecting the cultural heritage from natural disasters, policy department structural and cohesion policies, Culture and Education, European Parliament. www.europarl.europa.eu/.../IPOL-CULT_ET(2007)369029_EN.pdf. Accessed Sep 2015.

  • EU: Council of the European Union. (2014). Conclusions on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe, Brussels, 20 May 2014. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/educ/142705.pdf. Accessed Nov 2015.

  • Fallahi, A. (2007). Lessons learned from the housing reconstruction following the bam earthquake in Iran. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22(1), 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., & Jaeger, W. (2008). The sistani-house approach to a reconstruction in reinforced adobe masonry (Vol. 2, pp. 12–17). Tehran: Arg, Annual Report of Arg-e Bam Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosagrahar, J., et al. (2015). Cultural Heritage, the UN Sustainable Development Goals, and the New Urban Agenda, ICOMOS Concept Note for the United Nations Post-2015 Agenda and the Third United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (HABITAT III). ICOMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICHHTO. (2008). Comprehensive management plan for bam and its cultural landscape (2008–2017). Iran: ICHHTO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICHO (2004a). “Bam and its Cultural Landscape”, UNESCO World Heritage Nomination file, (Consulted on 18/5/2014). Iranian Cultural Heritage Organisation. Available from: http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/nominations/1208bis.pdf. [September 2015]. 

  • ICHO (2004b). The BAM Declaration and Recommendations, International Workshop on the Recovery of Bam’s Cultural Heritage (Consulted on 17/7/2014). Iranian Cultural Heritage Organisation. Available from: http://www.international.icomos.org/xian2005/bam-declaration.pdf. [September 2015]. 

  • Jigyasu, R., et al. (2010). Managing disaster risks for world heritage. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, ICCROM, ICOMOS, IUCN. http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-630-1.pdf. Accessed Oct 2015.

  • Jigyasu, R., et al. (2013). Heritage and resilience: Issues and opportunities for reducing disaster risks, 4th session of the global platform for disaster risk reduction, 19–23 May 2013 in Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, F., et al. (2015). Cultures and disasters: understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langenbach, R. (2005). Performance of the Earthen Arg-e-Bam (Bam citadel) during the 2003 earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21(S1). Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 345–374. http://www.conservationtech.com/RL%27s%20resume&%20pub%27s/RL-publications/Eq-pubs/2005-EERIspectra-BAM/Bam%28EQ-Spectra%29color.pdf. Accessed Oct 2015.

  • Lizarralde, G., Valladares, A., Olivera, A., Bornstein, L., Gould, K., & Duyne Barenstein, J. (2013). Towards strategic resilience: The cuban model to vulnerability reduction and reconstruction. Disasters. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Breen, P., & Anderies, J. M. (2011). Resilience: A literature review. http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/publications/resilience-literature-review. Accessed Oct 2015.

  • Moghtaderi-Zadeh, M., Nadim, F., & Bolourchi, M. (2004). Performance of lifeline Systems in bam Earthquake of 26 December 2003. In JSEE: Special issue on bam earthquake (pp. 153–168). Tehran: International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtari, E., Nejati, M., & Vatandoust, R. (2008). Consolidation and reinforcement of destabilized earthen structures in bam after the earthquake of December 2003: Some new approaches. International Collaborations to Preserve Earthen Architectural Heritage (pp. 312–316). Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsizadeh, F., Ibrion, M., Lein, H., Mokhtari, M., & Nadim, F. (2015). Bam 2003 earthquake disaster: On the earthquake risk perception, resilience and earthquake culture - Cultural beliefs and cultural landscape of Qanats, gardens of Khorma trees and Argh-e Bam. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.011i. Accessed Dec 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, U. (2012). Resilience and Sustainable Development: Theory of resilience, systems thinking and adaptive governance. 2012 European Sustainable Development Network (ESDN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravankhah, M., & Schmidt, M. (2014). Developing Methodology of Disaster Risk Assessment for Cultural Heritage Sites. Proceeding of Residential Doctoral School (RDS) at 4th International Conference on Building Resilience, Salford Quays, UK, 8–10 September 2014, pp.13–22. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/publications/v.php?id=41475. Accessed Nov 2015.

  • Sabri, R. C., Miller P., & Dierkx, R. (2006). Rebuilding a sustainable image in a cultural landscape. Environmental Sciences. Vol. 12, 49–58. http://www.sid.ir/en/VEWSSID/J_pdf/112920061206.pdf. Accessed Oct 2015.

  • Sagnia, B. (2004). Framework for cultural impact assessment. International Network for Cultural Diversity (INCD).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Committee on Sustainable Development. (2004). Bam sustainable development manifesto. The Centre for Architectural and Urban Studies and Research, Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Tehran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, G. A. (1999). Sustainability and community resilience: The holy grail of hazards planning? Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 1(1), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2015). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2015/en/home/. Accessed Dec 2015.

  • UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda. (2012). Realising the future we want for all. New York: Report to the Secretary-General. www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/Post_2015_UNTTreport.pdf. Accessed Sep 2015.

  • UNISDR. (2005). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015. http://www.unisdr.org/2005/wcdr/intergover/official-doc/L-docs/Hyogo-framework-for-action-english.pdf. Accessed Oct 2015.

  • UNISDR. (2009). Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland: UNISDR. http://www.unisdr.org/files/7817_UNISDRTerminologyEnglish.pdf. Accessed Oct 2015.

  • UNISDR. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, United Nations. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf. Accessed Sep 2015.

  • UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (2007). Strategy for Reducing Risks from Disasters at World Heritage properties. World Heritage Committee thirty first Session in Christchurch, New Zealand 23 June – 2 July 2007. Paris: UNESCO WHC. whc.unesco.org/archive/2007/whc07-31com-72e.pdf. Accessed May 2015.

  • UNESCO ICH. (2010). Ritual dramatic art of Ta‘zīye. http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/en/RL/ritual-dramatic-art-of-taziye-00377. Accessed May 2016.

  • UNESCO WHC. (2010). State of Conservation of Bam and its Cultural Landscape. http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/472. Accessed May 2016.

  • Ward English, P. (1998). Qanats and Lifeworlds in Iranian plateau villages. In J. Albert & Yale Center for International and Area Studies (Eds.), Transformations of middle eastern natural environments: Legacies and lessons (pp. 187–205). New Haven, Conn: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthing, D., & Bond, S. (2008). Managing built heritage: The role of cultural significance. Oxford: Blackwell Pub.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Ravankhah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ravankhah, M., Chmutina, K., Schmidt, M., Bosher, L. (2017). Integration of Cultural Heritage into Disaster Risk Management: Challenges and Opportunities for Increased Disaster Resilience. In: Albert, MT., Bandarin, F., Pereira Roders, A. (eds) Going Beyond. Heritage Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57165-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57165-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57164-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57165-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics