Skip to main content

Terrorism, jus post bellum and the Prospect of Peace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nature of Peace and the Morality of Armed Conflict
  • 295 Accesses

Abstract

Just War scholars focus increasingly on the importance of jus post bellum – justice after war – for the legitimacy of military campaigns. Should something akin to jus post bellum standards apply to terrorist campaigns? Assuming that at least some terrorist actors pursue legitimate goals or just causes, the first part of the chapter asks whether terrorist actors have greater difficulty satisfying the prospect of success criterion of Just War Theory than military actors. The second part discusses whether the use of the terrorist method as such – state or non-state – may jeopardize a lasting peace in a way that other violent, for instance military, strategies do not? I will argue that as an indirect strategy, terrorism is less likely to secure concrete positive long-term political goals. However, non-state terrorist agents may still be more likely to meet jus post bellum-criteria and secure a lasting peace than military agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bass, Gary J. 2004. Jus Post Bellum. Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (4): 384–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, Todd A. 2013. Reasonable Chance of Success: Analyzing the Postwar Requirements of Just ad Bellum. In Routledge Handbook of Ethics and War, ed. Fritz Allhoff, G.Evans Nicholas, and Adam Henschke, 120–131. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coady, C.A.J. (Tony). 2008. Morality and Political Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, Christopher J. 2015. Terrorism and the Right to Resist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia. 2004. Terrorism, Rights, and Political Goals. In Terrorism: The Philosophical Issues, ed. Igor Primoratz, 65–79. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Bruce. 2006. Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honderich, Ted. 2003. After the Terror. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurka, Thomas. 2005. Proportionality in the Morality of War. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (1): 34–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, Larry, and Andrew Forcehimes (eds.). 2012. Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Larry, and Elizabeth Edenberg (eds.). 2013. Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messelken, Daniel. 2005. Terrorism and Guerrilla Warfare—A Comparative Essay. In Ethics of Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism, ed. Georg Meggle, 51–68. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, Stephen. 2010. Terrorism and the Ethics of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, Richard M. 2013. Jus Post Bellum. War Closure in the 21st Century. In Routledge Handbook of Ethics and War: Just War Theory in the 21st Century, ed. Allhoff Fritz, G.Evans Nicholas, and Adam Henschke, 105–119. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orend, Brian. 2006. The Morality of War. Ontario: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. War. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/war/.

  • Patterson, Eric (ed.). 2012. Ethics Beyond War’s End. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, James. 2015. Jus Post Bellum and the Responsibility to Rebuild. British Journal of Political Science 45 (3): 635–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primoratz, Igor. 2004. State Terrorism and Counter-terrorism. In Terrorism: The Philosophical Issues, ed. Igor Primoratz, 113–127. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. A Philosopher Looks at Contemporary Terrorism. Cardozo Law Review 29 (1): 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Terrorism. A Philosophical Investigation. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenkenbecher, Anne. 2012. Terrorism: A Philosophical Enquiry. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwenkenbecher, Anne. 2014. Collateral Damage and the Principle of Due Care. Journal of Military Ethics 13 (1): 94–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shughart, William F. 2006. An Analytical History of Terrorism, 1945–2000. Public Choice 128 (1–2): 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhoff, Uwe. 2007. On the Ethics of War and Terrorism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toner, Christopher. 2010. The Logical Structure of Just War Theory. Journal of Ethics 14 (2): 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, Charles. 2002. Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uniacke, Suzanne. 2010. Self-Defence, Just War and a Reasonable Prospect of Success. In How We Fight. Ethics in War, ed. Frowe Helen and Lang Gerald, 62–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Schwenkenbecher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwenkenbecher, A. (2017). Terrorism, jus post bellum and the Prospect of Peace. In: Demont-Biaggi, F. (eds) The Nature of Peace and the Morality of Armed Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57123-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics