Skip to main content

Mind the Gap: Bridging Disability Studies and Bioarchaeology—An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bioarchaeology of Impairment and Disability

Part of the book series: Bioarchaeology and Social Theory ((BST))

Abstract

Bioarchaeology—the meticulous study of archaeologically derived human remains—provides us with an empirical dataset that can be used to explore how past variations in social organization affected human bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agarwal, S. C., & Glencross, B. A. (2011). Social bioarchaeology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez, A. S. (2012). The application of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health in psychiatry: Possible reasons for the lack of implementation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(13), S69–S73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: A case for Anti-discrimination legislation. London: Hurst & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battles, H. (2011). Towards engagement: Exploring the prospects for an integrated anthropology of disability. vis-à-vis: Explorations in Anthropology, 11(1), 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin, A. T. (2016). Exploring the social construction of disability: An application of the bioarchaeology of personhood model to a pathological skeleton from ancient Bahrain. International Journal of Paleopathology, 12, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. J., & Wilkie, L. A. (2006). The Prism of self: Gender and personhood. In S. M. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of gender in archaeology (pp. 333–364). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. (Ed.). (2013a). The disability studies reader (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. (2013b). Introduction: Disability, normality, and power. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (4th ed., pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. (2013c). The end of identity politics: On disability as an unstable category. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (4th ed., pp. 263–277). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettwyler, K. A. (1991). Can paleopathology provide evidence for ‘compassion’? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 84, 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickel, D. N., & Doran, G. H. (1989). Severe neural tube defect syndrome from the early Archaic of Florida. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 80, 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, V. (1980). Attitudes and disabled people: Issues for discussion. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, N. (1999). Disability and archaeology. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 15(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayer, D. W., Horton, W. A., Macchiareli, R., & Mussi, M. (1987). Dwarfism in an adolescent from the Italian Late Upper Paleolithic. Nature, 330, 60–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, P. L. (2017). The Bioarchaeology of socio-sexual lives: Queering common sense about sex, gender, and sexuality (bioarchaeology and social theory). New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2011). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D., Hughes, B., & Davis, L. (Eds.). (2012). Disability and social theory: New developments and directions. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowland, R. L. (2006). Age as an aspect of social identity: The archaeological funerary evidence. In R. L. Gowland & C. J. Knüsel (Eds.), The social archaeology of funerary remains (pp. 143–154). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollimon, S. E. (2011). Sex and gender in bioarchaeological research. In S. C. Agarwal & B. A. Glencross (Eds.), Social bioarchaeology (pp. 147–182). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, J. (Ed.). (2000). Madness, disability and social exclusion: The archaeology and anthropology of ‘difference’. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. A. (2000). Gender and power in prehispanic Mesoamerica. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. A. (2009). Ancient bodies, ancient lives: Sex, gender, and archaeology. New York: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasnitz, D., & Shuttleworth, R. P. (2001). Engaging anthropology in disability studies. In L. J. Rogers & B. B. Swadener (Eds.), Semiotics and dis/ability: Interrogating categories of difference (pp. 19–42). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knüsel, C. J. (1999). Orthopaedic disability: Some hard evidence. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 15(2), 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, N. C. (2016). Tiptoeing through the rest of his life: A functional adaptation to a leg shortened by femoral neck fracture. International Journal of Paleopathology, 13, 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsteller, S. J., Torres-Rouff, C., & Knudson, K. J. (2011). Pre-Columbian Andean sickness ideology and the social experience of leishmaniasis: A contextualized analysis of bioarchaeological and paleopathological data from San Pedro de Atacama, Chile. International Journal of Paleopathology, 1(1), 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevitt, M., Felson, D., & Lester, G. (2006). The osteoarthritis initiative: Protocol for the cohort study. https://oai.epi-ucsf.org/datarelease/. Accessed April 15 2016.

  • Nielsen, K. E. (2012). A disability history of the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (2004). The social model in action: If I had a hammer. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability (pp. 18–31). Leeds: The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R., & Ginsburg, F. (2012). Anthropology and the study of disability worlds. In M. C. Inhorn & E. A. Wentzell (Eds.), Medical anthropology at the intersections: Histories, activisms, and futures (pp. 163–182). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid-Cunningham, A. R. (2009). Anthropological theories of disability. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(1), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. A. (1999). Disability in the skeletal record: Assumptions, problems and some examples. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 15(2), 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. A. (2000). Did they take sugar? The use of skeletal evidence in the study of disability in past populations. In J. Hubert (Ed.), Madness, disability and social exclusion: The archaeology and anthropology of ‘difference’ (pp. 46–59). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, J. (2002). Time and biography. Osteobiography of the Italian Neolithic lifespan. In Y. Hamilakis, M. Pluciennik, & S. Tarlow (Eds.), Thinking Through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality (pp. 153–172). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roush, S. E., & Sharby, N. (2011). Disability reconsidered: The paradox of physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 91(12), 1715–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacht, R. M. (2001). Engaging anthropology in disability studies: American Indian issues. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21(3), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (1999). Commentary: Observations on disability and archaeology. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 15(2), 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs (1st ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer, J. (2006). The body as material culture: A theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Southwell-Wright, W. (2013). Past perspectives: What can archaeology offer disability studies? In M. Wappett & K. Arndt (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on disability studies (pp. 67–95). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stodder, A. L. W., & Palkovich, A. M. (Eds.). (2012). The Bioarchaeology of Individuals. University Press of Florida: Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, J., French, S., Barnes, C., & Thomas, C. (Eds.). (2014). Disabling barriers—Enabling environments (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, L. (2015). Theory and Practice in the bioarchaeology of care. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, L., & Cameron, T. (2014). Introducing the index of care: A web-based application supporting archaeological research into health-related care. International Journal of Paleopathology, 6, 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, L., & Oxenham, M. F. (2011). Survival against the odds: Modeling the social implications of care provision to seriously disabled individuals. International Journal of Paleopathology, 1(1), 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. (2006). A history of archaeological thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E., & Zimmerman, M. R. (1982). Trauma among the Shanidar Neanderthals. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 57, 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Duijvenbode, A., Herschensohn, O. J., & Morgan, M. E. (2015). A severe case of congenital aural atresia in pre-Columbian Venezuela. International Journal of Paleopathology, 9, 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, T. (2000). Hidden or overlooked? Where are the disadvantaged in the skeletal record? In J. Hubert (Ed.), Madness, disability and social exclusion: The archaeology and anthropology of ‘difference’ (pp. 29–45). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, N., Roulstone, A., & Thomas, C. (2012). Routledge handbook of disability studies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. W., Milner, G. R., Harpending, H. C., & Weiss, K. M. (1992). The osteological paradox: Problems of inferring prehistoric health from skeletal samples. Current Anthropology, 33(4), 343–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakrzewski, S. (2011). Population migration, variation, and identity. In S. C. Agarwal & B. A. Glencross (Eds.), Social bioarchaeology (pp. 183–211). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to extend our gratitude to our colleagues, who have contributed to this volume. This includes the chapter authors who have carefully engaged with social theories and clinical and historical literature to add to the interdisciplinary focus of the volume. We especially acknowledge those authors outside of bioarchaeology who thoughtfully articulated their own discipline’s theories, ideologies, and practices with the anthropological analysis of human skeletal remains. We thank all of the external reviewers whose insightful comments have added immensely to this body of work. We also acknowledge Katherine Dettwyler and Russell Shuttleworth for the valuable comments provided during the 2015 Embodying Impairment: Towards a Bioarchaeology of Disability symposium. We thank Deb Martin, Bioarchaeology and Social Theory editor, as well as Teresa Kraus and Hana Nagdimov from Springer for all of their assistance in helping this volume come to fruition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer F. Byrnes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Byrnes, J.F., Muller, J.L. (2017). Mind the Gap: Bridging Disability Studies and Bioarchaeology—An Introduction. In: Byrnes, J., Muller, J. (eds) Bioarchaeology of Impairment and Disability. Bioarchaeology and Social Theory. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56949-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56949-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56948-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56949-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics