Skip to main content

An Alternative to Multi-response Optimization Using a Bayesian Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on Applied Industrial Tools and Techniques

Abstract

This chapter proposes the modification of a technique of simultaneous optimization of multiple response variables that works using a Bayesian predictive distribution to incorporate different weights to the response variables according to their importance in the cost or functionality of products. To achieve this, the desirability function has been incorporated into the original proposal. This research shows through the simulation of different scenarios in a case study taken from literature that the proposed optimum process operating conditions always moved towards regions where the response variables with the highest weights had the best results, at the expense of performance in variables with the lowest weights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames AE, Matucci N, Macdonald S, Szonyi G, Hawkins DM (1997) Quality loss function for optimization across multiple response surfaces. J Qual Technol 29(3):339–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahloul B, Lassoued MA, Sfar S (2014) A novel approach for the development and optimization of self emulsifying drug delivery system using HLB and response surface methodology: application to fenofibrate encapsulation. Int J Pharm 466(1–2):341–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Ch’ng CK, Quah SH, Low HC (2005) Index C*pm in multiple response optimization. Qual Eng 17(1):165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiao CH, Hamada M (2001) Analyzing experiments with correlated multiple responses. J Qual Technol 33(4):451–465

    Google Scholar 

  • De Figueiredo AK, Rodríguez LM, Riccobene IC, Nolasco SM (2014) Analysis of the performance of a dehulling system for confectionary sunflower seeds. Food Nutr Sci 5:541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Castillo E, Montgomery DC, McCarville DR (1996) Of self emulsifying drug delivery system using HLB and response surface methodology: application to fenofibrate encapsulation. Int J Pharm 341–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12(4):214–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez H, De la Vara R (2012) Análisis y Diseño de Experimentos. Mc Graw Hill, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Jhonson ME (1987) Multivariate statistical simulation: a guide to selecting and generating continuous multivariate distributions. Wiley, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ko YH, Kim KJ, Jun CH (2005) A new loss function-based method for multiresponse optimization. J Qual Technol 37(1):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee MS, Kim KJ (2007) Expected desirability function: consideration of both location and dispersion effects in desirability function approach. Qual Technol Quant Manage 4(3):365–377

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miró-Quesada G, Del Castillo E, Peterson JJ (2004) A bayesian approach for multiple response surface optimization in the presence of noise variables. J Appl Stat 31(3):251–270

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2005) Diseño y Análisis de Experimentos. Limusa Wiley, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response surface methodology process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley lnterscience, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz F, Simpson JR, Pignatiello JJ, Heredia-Lagner A (2004) A genetic algorithm approach to multiple-response optimization. J Qual Technol 36(4):432–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson JJ (2004) A posterior predictive approach to multiple response surface optimization. J Qual Technol 36(2):139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Plante RD (2001) Process capability: a criterion for optimizing multiple response product and process design. IIE Trans 33(6):497–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek B, Tansel Y, Simsek EH (2013) A fullfactorial design based desirability function approach for optimization of properties of C 40/50 concrete class. J Math Comput Appl 18(3):330–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera CL, De Zan M, Cámara MS, Goicoechea HC (2014) Experimental design and multiple response optimization. Using the desirability function in analytical methods development. J Talanta 124:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Lu X, Li S, Zhong M, Shi X, Luo G, Ding L (2004) Investigation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid adsorption onto MIEX resin: Optimization using response surface methodology. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45(4):1835–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Limon-Romero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Limon-Romero, J., Luz-Tortorella, G., Puente, C., Moreno-Jiménez, J.M., Maciel-Monteon, M. (2018). An Alternative to Multi-response Optimization Using a Bayesian Approach. In: García-Alcaraz, J., Alor-Hernández, G., Maldonado-Macías, A., Sánchez-Ramírez, C. (eds) New Perspectives on Applied Industrial Tools and Techniques. Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56871-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56871-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56870-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56871-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics