Abstract
Since the early 1990’s Semiotic Engineering has evolved from a semiotic-based approach to user interface languages design to a comprehensive theory of Human-Computer-Interaction (HCI). More recently, in 2016, Semiotic Engineering went beyond HCI and gave initial contributions to the field of Human-Centered Computing. This chapter presents three aspects that can be interpreted as constants in the process of permanent evolution of this theory: Reflexivity, Transdisciplinarity, and Humanistic values. The stimulus and support to engagement in critical reasoning about research and practice; the development of a distinct and transdisciplinary object of study examined in light of its own ontology and methodology; and the role of human meanings and values in the theory are discussed as drivers of innovation and transformation. These key factors can serve as supporting analytical categories in discussions around Semiotic Engineering and its contributions, as well as in the learning process of the theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersen PB (1997) A theory of computer semiotics: semiotic approaches to construction and assessment of computer systems, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Barbosa SDJ, Paula MG (2003) Designing and evaluating interaction as conversation: a modeling language based on semiotic engineering. In: Jorge J, Nunes NJ, Falcão e Cunha J (eds) Interactive systems design, specification, and verification: 10th international workshop, DSV-IS 2003. Madeira Island, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 16–33
Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books, Garden City
Carroll J (2003) HCI models, theories, and frameworks: toward a multidisciplinary science. Carroll JM (ed) Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco
Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society: the information age: economy, society, and culture. Wiley-Blackwell, New York
Creswell J (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, New York
de Souza CS (1993) The semiotic engineering of user interface languages. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 39(5):753–773. doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1082
de Souza CS (2005a) The semiotic engineering of human-computer interaction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
de Souza CS (2005b) Semiotic engineering: bringing designers and users together at interaction time. Interact Comput 17(3):317–341. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.01.007
de Souza CS, Leitão CF (2009) Semiotic engineering methods for scientific research in HCI. Morgan and Claypool, San Francisco
de Souza CS, Leitão CF, Prates RO, da Silva EJ (2006) The semiotic inspection method. In Proceedings of VII Brazilian symposium on human factors in computing systems. New York, ACM, pp 148–157. (IHC ’06). Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1298023.1298044
de Souza CS, Leitão CF, Prates RO, Amélia Bim S, da Silva EJ (2010) Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? The case of semiotic inspection. Int J Hum Comput Stud 68(1–2):22–40. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.006
de Souza CS (2013) Semiotics and human-computer interaction. In: Soegaard M, Dam RF (eds) The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction, 2nd edn. The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus
de Souza CS et al (2016) Software developers as users. Semiotic investigations in human-centered software development. Springer, London
Dourish P (2001) Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Eco U (1976) A theory of semiotics, vol 217. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 105–117
Kaptelinin V, Nardi B (2006) Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Nadin M (1988) Interface design: a semiotic paradigm. Semiotica 69(3–4):269–302. doi:10.1515/semi.1988.69.3-4.269
Norman DA (1986) User centered systems design. In: Norman DA, Draper SW (eds), (pp 31–62), Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Hillsdale
Peirce CP (1992–1998). The essential Peirce, vols 1 and 2. Indiana. University Press, Bloomington
Prates RO, de Souza CS, Barbosa SDJ (2000) The communicability evaluation method for user interfaces. Interactions 7(1):33–38. doi:10.1145/328595.328608
Salgado LCC, Leitão CF, De SCS (2013) A journey through cultures: metaphors for guiding the design of cross-cultural interactive systems. Springer, London
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
Sebe N (2010) Human-centered computing. In: Nakashima H, Aghajan H, Augusto J (eds) Handbook of ambient intelligence and smart environments. Springer, New York, pp 349–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93808-0_13
Winograd T (ed) (1996) Bringing design to software. ACM Press/Addison- Wesley, New York/Reading
Acknowledgments
Thank you, Clarisse, for always inspiring us. Thanks to all SERG members for making our group a special place of conversation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leitão, C. (2017). Semiotic Engineering as a Reflexive, Transdisciplinary and Humanistic Theory in and Beyond HCI. In: Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, S., Breitman, K. (eds) Conversations Around Semiotic Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56291-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56291-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56290-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56291-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)