Skip to main content

(Monetary) Policy Options for the Euro Area: A Compendium to the Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Monetary Policy, Financial Crises, and the Macroeconomy

Abstract

Nine years after Lehman, the euro area remains mired in stagnation which stands in stark contrast to the economic recovery in the US or the UK. This chapter takes a look at the macroeconomic policies that have led to this outcome within the particular institutional setup of the euro area and discusses feasible ways forward. It argues that procyclical fiscal tightening has exacerbated the crisis and, given constraints to monetary policy and limits to what structural reforms can deliver, increased the likelihood of becoming stuck in an equilibrium characterized by low growth and low inflation which has contributed to rising anti-European sentiment. Since the required change of direction does not seem imminent, the outright creation of broad money would provide an effective tool to salvage stable prices, growth, and employment. If done diligently, such a monetary policy operation would be squarely within the ECB’s remit without compromising its independence or credibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to faster population growth in the US and the UK, the picture looks a bit more benign in per capita terms although the cumulative difference in population growth only amounts to 3.5 p.p. over the same time period.

  2. 2.

    Jarocinski and Lenza (2016) try to address the uncertainty surrounding different output gap estimation techniques by ranking various approaches according to their predictive qualities. For the best performing model they find an average output gap of around −6% in 2014 and 2015 which is much wider than institutional estimates for this period of between −2% and −3%.

  3. 3.

    Therefore, the often used label sovereign debt crisis appears misleading and may even obscure the necessary remedial policy responses (see Sect. 4).

  4. 4.

    See Caballero et al. (2015) for theoretical underpinnings and further implications.

  5. 5.

    Borio and Disyatat (2009) point out that “a reserve requirement, depending on its remuneration, affects the cost of intermediation and that of loans, but does not constrain credit expansion quantitatively. (…) By the same token, (…) an expansion of reserves in excess of any requirement does not give banks more resources to expand lending. It only changes the composition of liquid assets of the banking system. Given the very high substitutability between bank reserves and other government assets held for liquidity purposes, the impact can be marginal at best” (p. 19).

  6. 6.

    That is not to say that the counterfactual, i.e. inactivity, would have been preferable.

  7. 7.

    See for example Bullard (2010), Antolin-Diaz (2014), OECD (2016a).

  8. 8.

    Buiter (2014) formally shows that generally “there always exists a combined monetary and fiscal policy action that boosts private demand - in principle without limit. Deflation, inflation below target, (…) and secular stagnation are therefore unnecessary. They are policy choices” (p. 2).

  9. 9.

    The aggregate fiscal contraction in the EA masks considerable cross-country differences. Consolidation efforts have been most pronounced in the countries which displayed the largest output gaps and therefore also exhibited the highest fiscal multipliers (see Sect. 4.2).

  10. 10.

    For instance, Krebs and Scheffel (2016) evaluate the return on investment from implementing structural reforms that involve expansionary fiscal policy in Germany and find that “the reform package [comprising a reduction in the social security tax in the low-wage sector and a publicly financed expansion of full-day school/child care] generates a balanced budget after 7 years and produces a fiscal surplus of 0.11 percent of GDP after 10 years. For any real interest rate (…) lower than 9.37 percent, the proposed reform package is fiscally efficient in the sense that the present value of fiscal deficits and fiscal surpluses is positive.”

  11. 11.

    As Draghi (2016) has pointed out, low interest rates are the “symptom of an underlying problem, which is insufficient investment demand” and that “those advocating a lesser role for monetary policy or a shorter period of monetary expansion necessarily imply a larger role for fiscal policy to raise demand and close the output gap faster”. This notwithstanding, there is no convincing reason why savers should be entitled to non-negative risk-free real interest rates or why the government should supply such an asset in the form of cash (see Sect. 3.2).

  12. 12.

    Cournéde et al. (2014) provide a comprehensive quantitative assessment of the impact of various fiscal consolidation measures on growth and public finances which enables them to deduct a hierarchy of consolidation instruments.

  13. 13.

    Helgadottir (2016) argues that this school of thought has played a significant role in shaping the European policy response to the crisis.

  14. 14.

    Holland and Portes (2012) describe the dynamics as a “death spiral” where falling output leads to rising debt which raises risk premia and, in turn, aggravates the situation even further.

  15. 15.

    For an operationalisation and visualisation of fiscal space across countries see for instance Ghosh et al. (2013) who show that while some EA countries are severely constrained (absent fiscal transfers) others still have ample leeway to bolster the EA’s economy through fiscal support.

  16. 16.

    In addition, public debt plays a pivotal role in providing a safe and liquid asset which should appropriately be taken into account (Holmstrom and Tirole 1998; Caballero et al. 2016). Needless to say, there is broad agreement over the perils of excessive, unsustainable credit growth, both in the public and the private sector.

  17. 17.

    As Sims (1999) predicted, “the fiscal institutions as yet unspecified will have to arise or be invented in order for EMU to be a long term success” (p. 1). See also Feldstein (1992).

  18. 18.

    Rocholl and Stahmer (2016) calculate that “only €9.7 billion or less than 5% of the total amount of €215.9 billion being distributed in the 1st and 2nd programme were not used for debt-related payments and bank recapitalizations and thus directly contributed to the Greek fiscal budget” (p. 4).

  19. 19.

    See for example Buiter (2003), Tilford and Whyte (2011), Eyraud and Wu (2015), Mody (2015).

  20. 20.

    Dullien and Guerot (2012) ascribe the phenomenon of rigid rules and righteousness reigning supreme over discretionary pragmatism to ordoliberalism as a guiding principle among leading German policymakers, even when it goes against the country’s own very interests as Wolf (2012b), Evans-Pritchard (2014), and Fratzscher (2014) note.

  21. 21.

    The claim that there has not been an alternative to front-loading fiscal consolidation in the early stages of the euro crisis lacks substance. Countries that had lost market access such as Greece certainly did not have the means for less contractionary fiscal policy in their own right (or run any deficit for that matter). Nonetheless, an earlier and more comprehensive debt restructuring and the provision of greater bridge financing by the European partners up front could have enabled them to do so and obviated the need for further rescue packages by reducing the overall costs of fiscal support in net present value terms. Hence, decisions to assume a large part of Greece’s liabilities towards private creditors and to demand large front-loaded fiscal adjustment measures reflected political choices rather than binding economic constraints.

  22. 22.

    Kahnemann (2011) and Thaler and Sunstein (2008) offer further psychological explanations that i.a. allude to status quo bias and loss aversion, hampering a change in thinking and action.

  23. 23.

    Legrain (2014), for instance, lines out a blueprint after surveying a number of different reform proposals.

  24. 24.

    See for instance Feldstein (2012), Rogoff (2012), Sinn (2015), DeLong (2015). Schmitt-Grohé and Uribe (2011) estimate the costs of adhering to a fixed currency regime following large negative external shocks. In their baseline scenario, they find that such adherence leads to an increase in unemployment by more than 20 percentage points and median welfare costs of between 4 and 10% of consumption per period.

  25. 25.

    Levy Yeyati and Panizza (2011) study the costs of sovereign defaults and find that default events tend to be associated with the beginning of economic recoveries.

  26. 26.

    de Bromhead et al. (2012) describe how allowing depressed economic conditions to persist has been conducive to the rise of right-wing extremist parties during the Great Depression. See also Ponticelli and Voth (2011).

  27. 27.

    See for example Reichlin et al. (2013), Galí (2014), Muellbauer (2014), Blyth and Lonergan (2014), Caballero et al. (2015), Turner (2015a), The Economist (2016).

  28. 28.

    Estimates from the Australian “cash splash” of 2009, in which the government sent households below certain income thresholds lump-sum transfer payments suggest that the MPC has been roughly 0.4 (Leigh 2012). In the case of OBM, the MPC would likely be higher given that the transfer would not add to national debt, alleviating potential Ricardian effects.

  29. 29.

    Naturally, some of the additional demand would go into imports, which would provide a boost to economies outside the currency area. This, in turn, would stimulate exports, albeit to a smaller degree. If net demand for foreign currency increases in response to OBM, the euro would depreciate and prove a boon to the export sector. However, it is also possible that net demand for euros would increase due to confidence effects associated with OBM among foreign investors.

  30. 30.

    The CLAC consists of capital and reserves (€97 billion) as well as revaluation accounts (€346 billion), which constitute unrealized gains on gold, foreign-exchange reserves, and securities (ECB 2016).

  31. 31.

    Using Monte Carlo simulations Bindseil et al. (2004) show that “central bank capital still does not seem to matter for monetary policy implementation, in essence because negative levels of capital do not represent any threat to the central bank being able to pay for whatever costs it has. Although losses may easily accumulate over a long period of time and lead to a huge negative capital, no reason emerges why this could affect the central bank’s ability to control interest rates. (…) One could therefore conclude that the model implies a perfect dichotomy between the central bank balance sheet structure and its ability to fulfill its monetary policy tasks” (p. 23).

  32. 32.

    For a brief discussion of Ricardian effects in the context of OBM see Sect. 7.5.

  33. 33.

    The present value of future seigniorage gains is even likely to increase under OBM as seigniorage grows when economic growth, inflation, and interest rates pick up.

  34. 34.

    There might be psychological ones which should be negligible for all practical purposes (Turner 2015b).

  35. 35.

    Bunea et al. (2016) provide an overview of how various central banks handle profit distribution and the accounting of losses.

  36. 36.

    See for example Carpenter et al. (2013): “When Reserve Bank income is not sufficient to cover interest expense, realized losses, operating and other expenses, a deferred asset is created. (…) [T]here is little guidance as to the whether or not there is a limit to the potential size of the asset. It may be plausible to assume that it would not be allowed to exceed the value of all future earnings, possibly in present discounted terms, given the fact that it is paid down through future earnings” (p. 13).

  37. 37.

    It deserves mentioning that any central bank operation has fiscal consequences. Even the central bank’s most conventional tool, changing the main refinancing rate, will invariably alter refinancing conditions for the government. It is therefore more instructive to distinguish policies according to their intent rather than according to which other policies would have yielded a similar outcome.

  38. 38.

    If one was opposed to OBM on grounds of this argument, then, by analogy, the central bank should never lower interest rates either because that might tempt politicians to call for further rate cuts in due course.

  39. 39.

    Although this does not necessarily have to be the case, see Sect. 5.3.

  40. 40.

    For an empirical investigation of the redistributive consequences of inflation see Doepke and Schneider (2006) who find that moderate rates of inflation tend to benefit young and middle-class households.

  41. 41.

    Contrary to government debt, interest on and repayment of OBM is state-contingent (besides being optional). Therefore, even if OBM would be perceived as a liability of the public sector, its present value is lower than an equivalent amount of government debt by definition. See also Turner (2016) for a discussion of this argument.

  42. 42.

    See also Sheard (2013), Sims (2013), Buiter (2014). For a discussion of the usage of reserve requirements as a policy tool see Gray (2011).

  43. 43.

    Different to the one-off character of helicopter money, however, the subsequent permanent conversion of wages (and pensions) at an overvalued exchange rate harmed competitiveness and employment.

References

  • Adler, G., Castro, P., & Tovar, C. E. (2016). Does Central Bank capital matter for monetary policy? Open Economies Review, 27(1), 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, R., & Kimball, M. (2015). Breaking Through the Zero Lower Bound. IMF Working Papers 15/224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altavilla, C., Giannone, D., & Lenza, M. (2014). The Financial and Macroeconomic Effects of OMT Announcements. Working Paper Series 1707, European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antolin-Diaz, J. (2014). Deflation Risk and the ECB’s Communication Strategy. Fulcrum Research Papers, February 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbatli, E., Botman, D., Clinton, K., Cova, P., Gaspar, V., Jakab, Z., et al. (2016). Reflating Japan: Time to Get Unconventional? IMF Working Papers 16/157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012). Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(2), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, R., & Sims, E. (2012). Confidence and the transmission of government spending shocks. Journal of Monetary Economics, 59(3), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., Beck, T., Bénassy-Quéré, A., Blanchard, O., Corsetti, G., de Grauwe, P., et al. (2015). Rebooting the Eurozone: Step 1 - agreeing a crisis narrative. CEPR Policy Insight, (85).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L. (2012). Ben Bernanke and the zero bound. Contemporary Economic Policy, 34(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., & Gordon, D. (1983). Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(1), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénassy-Quéré, A., Ragot, X., & Wolff, G. (2016). Which fiscal union for the euro area? Policy Contributions 12893, Bruegel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benecka, S., Holub, T., Kadlcakova, N., & Kubicova, I. (2012). Does Central Bank Financial Strength Natter for Inflation? An Empirical Analysis. Working Papers 2012/03, Czech National Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. (2002). Deflation: Making sure “it” doesn’t happen here. Remarks Before the National Economists Club, Washington, DC, November 21, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindseil, U., Manzanares, A., & Weller, B. (2004). The Role of Central Bank Capital Revisited. Working Paper Series 0392, European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bini Smaghi, L. (2014). Why the opponents of QE have failed to make their case. Financial Times, September 02.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2009). Issues in the governance of Central Banks. A Report from the Central Bank Governance Group, Chair: Guillermo Ortiz, Governor of the Bank of Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., Cerutti, E., & Summers, L. (2015). Inflation and Activity - Two Explorations and Their Monetary Policy Implications. NBER Working Papers 21726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., & Leigh, D. (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. American Economic Review, 103(3), 117–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., Mauro, P., & Acalin, J. (2016). The case for growth-indexed bonds in advanced economies today. Policy Briefs PB16-2, Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M., & Lonergan, E. (2014). Print less but transfer more. Foreign Affairs, September/October Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borio, C., & Disyatat, P. (2009). Unconventional Monetary Policies: An Appraisal. BIS Working Papers 292, Bank for International Settlements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borio, C., Disyatat, P., & Zabai, A. (2016). Helicopter money: The illusion of a free lunch. VoxEU.org, May 24, http://voxeu.org/article/helicopter-money-illusion-free-lunch. Accessed 01 June 2016.

  • Born, B., Müller, G., & Pfeifer, J. (2015). Does Austerity Pay Off? CEPR Discussion Papers 10425, Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, M., Garicano, L., Lane, P., Pagano, M., Reis, R., Santos, T., et al. (2016). The Sovereign-Bank Diabolic Loop and ESBies. NBER Working Papers 21993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buiter, W. (2003). Ten commandments for a fiscal rule in the E(M)U. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(1), 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buiter, W. (2014). The simple analytics of helicopter money: Why it works - always. Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 8, 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buiter, W., & Rahbari, E. (2012). Looking into the deep pockets of the ECB. Citi: Global Economics View, February 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, J. (2010). Seven faces of “The Peril”. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Sep, 339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunea, D., Karakitsos, P., Merriman, N., & Studener, W. (2016). Profit Distribution and Loss Coverage Rules for Central Banks. Occasional Paper Series 169, European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R., Farhi, E., & Gourinchas, P.-O. (2015). Global Imbalances and Currency Wars at the ZLB. NBER Working Papers 21670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R., Farhi, E., & Gourinchas, P.-O. (2016). Safe asset scarcity and aggregate demand. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 106(5), 513–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnot, N., & de Castro, F. (2015). The Discretionary Fiscal Effort: An Assessment of Fiscal Policy and Its Output Effect. Economic Papers 543, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., Ihrig, J., Klee, E., Quinn, D., & Boote, A. (2013). The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet and earnings: A primer and projections. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2013-01, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudik, A., Mohaddes, K., Pesaran, M. H., & Raissi, M. (2015). Is There a Debt-Threshold Effect on Output Growth? IMF Working Papers 15/197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, G., & Schmidt, S. (2016). The role of the ECB’s asset purchases in preventing a potential de-anchoring of longer-term inflation expectations. ECB Research Bulletin. 25 July 2016, European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constancio, V. (2011). Challenges to Monetary Policy in 2012. Speech at the 26th International Conference on Interest Rates. Frankfurt am Main, December 08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsetti, G., Higgins, M., & Pesenti, P. (2016). Policies and institutions for managing the aggregate macroeconomic stance of the Eurozone. In R. Baldwin & F. Giavazzi (Eds.), How to fix the Eurozone: Views of leading economists. Centre for Economic Policy Research: A VoxEU.org Book.

  • Cournéde, B., Goujard, A., & Pina, Á. (2014). Reconciling fiscal consolidation with growth and equity. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2013(1), 7–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvas, Z. (2011). A tale of three countries: Recovery after banking crises. Bruegel Policy Contribution (2011/19).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bromhead, A., Eichengreen, B., & O’Rourke, K. (2012). Right-Wing Political Extremism in the Great Depression. NBER Working Papers 17871.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, P. (2011) The European Central Bank: Lender of Last Resort in the Government Bond Markets? CESifo Working Paper Series 3569.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Dehesa, G. (2011). Eurozone design and management failures. VoxEU.org, May 18, http://www.voxeu.org/article/eurozone-design-and-management-failures. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Del Negro, M., & Sims, C. (2015). When does a Central Bank’s balance sheet require fiscal support? Journal of Monetary Economics, 73, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, J. B. (2015). Depression’s advocates. Project Syndicate, July 24, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/europe-repeating-mistakes-great-depression-by-j--bradford-delong-2015-07. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • DeLong, J. B., & Summers, L. (2012). Fiscal policy in a depressed economy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 44(Spring), 233–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doepke, M., & Schneider, M. (2006). Inflation and the redistribution of nominal wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 114(6), 1069–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draghi, M. (2012). Introductory statement to the press conference (with Q&A). Frankfurt am Main, September 06, http://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pressconf/2012/html/is120906.en.html. Accessed 01 June 2016.

  • Draghi, M. (2016). Speech at the annual meeting of the Asian Development Bank. Frankfurt am Main, May 02, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2016/html/sp160502.en.html. Accessed 01 June 2016.

  • Dullien, S., & Guerot, U. (2012). The long shadow of ordoliberalism: Germany’s approach to the euro crisis. ECFR Policy Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2015). Public opinion in the European Union. Standard Eurobarometer, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB. (2012). Box 2: The relationship between base money, broad money, and risks to price stability. ECB Monthly Bulletin, May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB. (2015). Box 2: What is behind the low investment in the euro area? Responses from a survey of large euro area firms. ECB Economic Bulletin, 8/2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB. (2016). ECB annual report 2015. Frankfurt am Main, April 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egert, B. (2015). Public debt, economic growth and nonlinear effects: Myth or reality? Journal of Macroeconomics, 43, 226–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, G., Ferrero, A., & Raffo, A. (2014). Can structural reforms help Europe? Journal of Monetary Economics, 61, 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, G., & Krugman, P. (2012). Debt, deleveraging, and the liquidity trap: A Fisher-Minsky-Koo approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1469–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B., & Wyplosz, C. (2016). How the Euro crisis was successfully resolved. VoxEU.org, February 12, http://www.voxeu.org/article/how-euro-crisis-was-successfully-resolved. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Eichengreen, B. P., & Evans, G. (2015). Structural reform indexed loans for Greece. VoxEU.org, August 31, http://www.voxeu.org/article/breaking-greek-debt-impasse/. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Estrada, A., Gali, J., & Lopez-Salido, D. (2013). Patterns of Convergence and Divergence in the Euro Area. NBER Working Papers 19561.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2010). Consolidated versions of the treaty on European Union and the treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 53(2010/C 83/01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2016a). European Youth in 2016 - Special Eurobarometer of the European Parliament. Public Opinion Monitoring Unit, European Parliamentary Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2016b). Online database, European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/PublicOpinion/index.cfm/Chart/getChart/chartType/gridChart//themeKy/9/groupKy/27/savFile/194 Accessed 01 Jun 2016.

  • Evans-Pritchard, A. (2014). Tim Geithner reveals in the raw how Europe’s leaders tried to commit financial suicide. The Telegraph, November 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyraud, L., & Wu, T. (2015). Playing by the Rules; Reforming Fiscal Governance in Europe. IMF Working Papers 15/67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatas, A., & Summers, L. (2015). The Permanent Effects of Fiscal Consolidations. CEPR Discussion Papers 10902, Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawley, B., & Neely, C. (2013). Four stories of quantitative easing. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 95(1), 51–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (1992). The case against EMU. The Economist, June 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (2012). The failure of the Euro. Foreign Affairs, January/February Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratzscher, M. (2014). Germany’s four neins. Project Syndicate, November 21, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/germany-wrong-on-european-policy-by-marcel-fratzscher-2014-11?barrier=true. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Friedman, M. (1969). The optimum quantity of money: And other essays. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galí, J. (2014). The Effects of a Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus. CEPR Discussion Papers 10165, Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galí, J. (2015). Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem Revisited. NBER Working Papers 21430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galí, J., López-Salido, J. D., & Vallós, J. (2007). Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(1), 227–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganelli, G., & Tervala, J. (2016). The Welfare Multiplier of Public Infrastructure Investment. IMF Working Papers 16/40.

    Google Scholar 

  • German Council of Economic Experts. (2014). Annual economic report 2015/16: “Focus on Future Viability”, Chapter four: Euro area: Slow down bond purchases, speed up reforms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A., Kim, J., Mendoza, E., Ostry, J., & Qureshi, M. (2013). Fiscal fatigue, fiscal space and debt sustainability in advanced economies. The Economic Journal, 123(566), F4–F30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, P. (2016). Janet Yellen: Helicopter money is an option in extreme situations. CNN Money, June 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. (2011). Central Bank Balances and Reserve Requirements. IMF Working Papers 11/36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guajardo, J., Leigh, D., & Pescatori, A. (2014). Expansionary austerity? International evidence. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(4), 949–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., & Reis, R. (2015). Maintaining Central-Bank Financial Stability Under New-Style Central Banking. NBER Working Papers 21173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebous, S., & Zimmermann, T. (2016). Can Government Demand Stimulate Private Investment? Evidence from U.S. Federal Procurement. IMF Working Papers 16/60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimberger, P., & Kapeller, J. (2016). The Performativity of Potential Output: Pro-cyclicality and Path Dependency in Coordinating European Fiscal Policies. Working Paper Series 50, Institute for New Economic Thinking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgadottir, O. (2016). The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 392–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., & Portes, J. (2012). Self-defeating austerity? National Institute Economic Review, 222, F4–F10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B., & Tirole, J. (1998). Private and public supply of liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 106(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEO of the IMF. (2014). Independent Evaluation Office of the International Monetary Fund: IMF response to the financial and economic crisis.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEO of the IMF. (2016). The IMF and the crises in Greece, Ireland, and Portugal: An evaluation by the Independent Evaluation Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illing, G., Jauch, S., & Zabel, M. (2012). Die diskussion um den Euro: Endogene risiken und multiple Gleichgewichte. Leviathan (2), 156–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2014). World Economic Outlook - Legacies, Clouds, Uncertainties. Washington (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2015a). An update of IMF staff’s preliminary public debt sustainability analysis. IMF Country Report, 15/186.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2015b). Crisis Program Review. November 09.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2016a). Fiscal Monitor - Acting Now, Acting Together. Washington (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2016b). World Economic Outlook - Too Slow for Too Long. Washington (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • in ’t Veld, J. (2013). Fiscal Consolidations and Spillovers in the Euro Area Periphery and Core. European Economy - Economic Papers 506, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issing, O. (2015). Die letzte Waffe - Helicopter money? SAFE Press Article, Frankfurt am Main, February 07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today, 5, 43–46, 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarocinski, M., & Lenza, M. (2016). How large is the output gap in the euro area. ECB Research Bulletin. 01 July 2016, European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobst, A., & Lin, H. (2016). Negative Interest Rate Policy (NIRP): Implications for Monetary Transmission and Bank Profitability in the Euro Area. IMF Working Papers 16/172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordà, O., & Taylor, A. (2013). The Time for Austerity: Estimating the Average Treatment Effect of Fiscal Policy. NBER Working Papers 19414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J. F. (1961). Speech at the 14th annual convention of Americans for Democratic Action, Washington, DC, May 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentikelenis, A., Karanikolos, M., Reeves, A., McKee, M., & Stuckler, D. (2014). Greece’s health crisis: From austerity to denialism. The Lancet, 383(9918), 748–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S., & Henry, J. (2014). The Euro and the Three Musketeers. HSBC Global Research: Economics Global, September 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, R. (2011). The world in balance sheet recession: Causes, cure, and politics. Real-world Economics Review, 58, 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, R. (2016). Cycle of conflict between authorities and markets seen continuing for now. Nomura Brief, March 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, T., & Scheffel, M. (2016). Structural Reform in Germany. IZA Discussion Papers 9787, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1982). Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 50(6), 1345–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1990). Business cycles: Real facts and a monetary myth. Quarterly Review (Spr), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagarde, C. (2016). Leaked: The annotated Lagarde letter on Greece. Financial Times, May 06, http://blogs.ft.com/brusselsblog/2016/05/06/leaked-the-annotated-lagarde-letter-on-greece/. Accessed 01 Jun 2016.

  • Lane, P. (2012). The European sovereign debt crisis. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legrain, P. (2014). How to finish the euro house. Center for European Reform, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, A. (2012). How much did the 2009 Australian fiscal stimulus boost demand? Evidence from household-reported spending effects. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 12(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy Yeyati, E., & Panizza, U. (2011). The elusive costs of sovereign defaults. Journal of Development Economics, 94(1), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1(1), 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, R. (1963). Optimum currency areas. American Economic Review, 53, 717–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeay, M., Radia, A., & Thomas, R. (2014). Money creation in the modern economy. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 54(1), 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mody, A. (2015). Living (Dangerously) Without a Fiscal Union. Working Papers 875, Bruegel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mody, A., & Mazzolini, G. (2014). Austerity Tales: The Netherlands and Italy. Bruegel, October 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muellbauer, J. (2014). Combatting Eurozone deflation: QE for the people. VoxEU.org, December 23, http://voxeu.org/article/combatting-eurozone-deflation-qe-people. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Mundell, R. (1963). A theory of optimum currency areas. American Economic Review, 51, 657–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nechio, F. (2011) Monetary policy when one size does not fit all. FRBSF Economic Letter 2011–18, June 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016a). OECD economic outlook, vol. 2016 Iss. 1. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016b). OECD economic surveys: Greece 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostry, J., Ghosh, A., & Espinoza, R. (2015). When should public debt be reduced? IMF Staff Discussion Notes 15/10, International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, U. (2013). Do we Need a Mechanism for Solving Sovereign Debt Crises? A Rule-Based Discussion. IHEID Working Papers 03-2013, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, U., & Presbitero, A. (2014). Public debt and economic growth: Is there a causal effect? Journal of Macroeconomics, 41, 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, E., Portes, R., & Reichlin, L. (2015). Greece: Seeking a way forward. VoxEU.org, June 19, http://www.voxeu.org/article/greece-seeking-way-forward. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Perotti, R. (2012). The “Austerity Myth”: Gain without Pain? In Fiscal policy after the financial crisis, NBER Chapters (pp. 307–354). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescatori, A., Sandri, D., & Simon, J. (2014). Debt and Growth; Is There a Magic Threshold? IMF Working Papers 14/34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew. (2016). Euroskepticism Beyond Brexit: Significant opposition in key European countries to an ever closer EU. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC, June 07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponticelli, J., & Voth, H.-J. (2011). Austerity and Anarchy: Budget Cuts and Social Unrest in Europe, 1919-2008. CEPR Discussion Papers 8513, Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, J., & Wren-Lewis, S. (2014). Issues in the Design of Fiscal Policy Rules. Discussion Paper Series 704, Department of Economics, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praet, P. (2016). The ECB’s fight against low inflation: Reasons and consequences. Speech at Luiss School of European Political Economy, Rome, April 04, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2016/html/sp160404.en.html. Accessed 01 June 2016.

  • Rannenberg, A., Schoder, C., & Strasky, J. (2015). The Macroeconomic Effects of the Euro Area’s Fiscal Consolidation 2011-2013: A Simulation-Based Approach. Research Technical Papers 03/RT/15, Central Bank of Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichlin, L., Turner, A., & Woodford, M. (2013). Helicopter money as a policy option. VoxEU.org, May 20, http://voxeu.org/article/helicopter-money-policy-option. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Reinhart, C., & Trebesch, C. (2014). A Distant Mirror of Debt, Default, and Relief. NBER Working Papers 20577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riera-Crichton, D., Vegh, C., & Vuletin, G. (2015). Procyclical and countercyclical fiscal multipliers: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 52(C), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocholl, J., & Stahmer, A. (2016). Where Did the Greek Bailout Money Go. ESMT White Paper, WP-16-02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (2012). A centerless Europe cannot hold. Project Syndicate, April 01, http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/a-centerless-euro-cannot-hold. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Rogoff, K. (2014). Paper money is unfit for a world of high crime and low inflation. Financial Times, May 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D. (2009). Advanced macroeconomics (3rd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (2016). Commons Memorial Lecture of the Omicron Delta Epsilon Society. https://paulromer.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/WP-Trouble.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rother, P., Schuknecht, L., & Stark, J. (2010). The Benefits of Fiscal Consolidation in Uncharted Waters. Occasional Paper Series 121, European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan-Collins, J. (2015). Is Monetary Financing Inflationary? A Case Study of the Canadian Economy, 1935-75. Working Paper Series 848, Levy Economics Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, P. (2016). Making it Harder for the Bad Guys: The Case for Eliminating High Denomination Notes. M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series, 52. Harvard Kennedy School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saravelos, G., Brehon, D., & Winkler, R. (2016). Helicopters 101: Your guide to monetary financing. Deutsche Bank Research Special Report, April 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Grohé, S., & Uribe, M. (2011). Pegs and Pain. NBER Working Papers 16847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht, L. (2016). Resist the siren song of ‘Cheap’ government spending. Wall Street Journal, July 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheard, P. (2013). Repeat After Me: Banks Cannot And Do Not “Lend Out” Reserves. Standard & Poor’s RatingsDirect, August 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (1994). A simple model for study of the determination of the price level and the interaction of monetary and fiscal policy. Economic Theory, 4(3), 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (1999). The precarious fiscal foundations of EMU. DNB Staff Reports (Discontinued), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (2013). Paper money. Slides, January 14, http://sims.princeton.edu/yftp/PaperMoney/PaperMoneySlides.pdf. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Sims, C. (2016). Fiscal policy, monetary policy, and Central Bank independence. In Proceedings, Economic Policy Symposium, Jackson Hole, August 25–27, Kansas City Fed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (2015). Why Greece should leave the Eurozone. New York Times, July 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenreyro, S., & Thwaites, G. (2015). Pushing on a String: US Monetary Policy is Less Powerful in Recessions. CEPR Discussion Papers 10786, Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2016). Out of ammo? February 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilford, S. (2011). Gain or more pain in Spain? Center for European Reform, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilford, S., & Whyte, P. (2011). Why stricter rules threaten the Eurozone. Center for European Reform, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2015a). Between debt and the devil: Money, credit, and fixing global finance. Princeton, CT: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2015b). The case for monetary finance - An essentially political issue. In Paper presented at the 16th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference, hosted by the International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, November 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2016). Why a future tax on bank credit intermediation does not offset the stimulative effect of money finance deficits. Institute for New Economic Thinking, Aug 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, J., & Delpla, J. (2011). Eurobonds: The blue bond concept and its implications. Policy Contributions 509, Bruegel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2012a). The German response. Financial Times, June 07, https://next.ft.com/content/bf08f8f7-8bff-3629-ad91-f0b5c7d1daf1. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Wolf, M. (2012b). The riddle of German self-interest. Financial Times, May 29, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4fe89d8c-a8df-11e1-b085-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz41IsFjef3. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Wolff, G. (2014). Europe’s fiscal wormhole. Project Syndicate, October 24, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/fiscally-responsible-eurozone-stimulus-by-guntram-b--wolff-2014-10. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Wren-Lewis, S. (2014a). The entirely predictable recession. Mainly Macro Blog, September 26, http://mainlymacro.blogspot.de/2014/09/the-entirely-predictable-recession.html. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Wren-Lewis, S. (2014b). The Eurozone scandal. Mainly Macro Blog, December 29, http://mainlymacro.blogspot.de/2014/12/the-eurozone-scandal.html. Accessed 01 May 2016.

  • Zinsmeister, F. (2009). Die Finanzierung der deutschen Einheit - Zum Umgang mit den Schuldlasten der Wiedervereinigung. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 78, 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author Sascha Bützer thanks Frank Heinemann, Gerhard Illing, Benedikt Kolb, Tobias Krahnke, Chris Sims, Livio Stracca, Steffen Strodthoff, and Robert Unger for useful suggestions and fruitful discussions that helped shape this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sascha Bützer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bützer, S. (2017). (Monetary) Policy Options for the Euro Area: A Compendium to the Crisis. In: Heinemann, F., Klüh, U., Watzka, S. (eds) Monetary Policy, Financial Crises, and the Macroeconomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56261-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics