Abstract
Mario Draghi’s famous “Whatever it takes” speech is widely credited as ending the euro area’s sovereign debt crisis by firmly establishing the ECB as the lender of last resort in the euro area and thereby eliminating what is referred to as “convertibility” risk premia. This chapter uses a dynamic conditional correlation model and finds that (non-fundamentally driven) contagion originating from the Greek debt crisis was to some extent responsible for those risk premia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Mario Draghi in his London speech referred to this risk as convertibility risk. It is sometimes also called “redenomination” risk. See De Santis (2015) for an empirical approach to measuring this risk.
- 2.
For a detailed overview of theoretical definitions and empirical measures used in contagion analysis please refer to Pericoli and Sbracia (2003).
- 3.
All data is collected from Thomson Reuters Datastream.
- 4.
A descriptive overview of the data is provided in Table 5 in Appendix 1.
- 5.
Besides other examples, the common monetary policy for the euro area represents a part of the global factor in our raw data. Loosening monetary policy could potentially simultaneously boost every analyzed economy and therefore lead to higher co-movements of assets even in the absence of contagion.
- 6.
For the numerical results of the principal component analysis please see Appendix 2.
- 7.
For numerical results of the DCC estimation please see Appendix 3.
- 8.
Note that there were no downgrades for Germany, thus we do not include any dummy in the regression equation for the Greek-German yield correlations. Appendix 4 shows similar figures for the other countries’ rating development and the scaling of the ratings.
- 9.
For clarity of presentation we show results for the Greek rating dummies in Table 4 only. For results with our control rating dummies please see Appendix 5.
References
Afonso, A., Furceri, D., & Gomes, P. (2012). Sovereign credit ratings and financial market linkages: Application to European data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31, 606–638.
Arezki, R., Candelon, B., & Sy, A. (2011). Sovereign rating news and financial markets spillovers: Evidence from the European debt crisis (IMF Working Papers 11/68).
Arghyrou, M. G., & Tsoukalas, J. D. (2011). The Greek debt crisis: Likely causes, mechanics and outcomes. The World Economy, 34, 173–191.
Bindseil, U., & Modery, W. (2011). Ansteckungsgefahren im Eurogebiet und die Rettungsmaßnahmen des Frühling 2010. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 12, 215–241.
Boyer, B. H., Gibson, M. S., & Loretan, M. (1997). Pitfalls in tests for changes in correlations (International Finance Discussion Paper 597R). Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Board.
Chiang, T. C., Jeon, B. N., & Li, H. (2007). Dynamic correlation analysis of financial contagion: Evidence from Asian markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26, 1206–1228.
Christiansen, C. (2000). Macroeconomic announcement effects on the covariance structure of government bond returns. Journal of Empirical Finance, 7, 479–507.
Corsetti, G., Pericoli, M., & Sbracia, M. (2005). Some contagion, some interdependence: More pitfalls in tests of financial contagion. Journal of International Money and Finance, 24, 1177–1199.
Corsetti, G., Pericoli, M., & Sbracia, M. (2011). Correlation analysis of financial contagion. In R. W. Kolb (Ed.), Financial contagion: The viral threat to the wealth of nations (pp. 11–20). New York: Wiley.
De Santis, R. A. (2015). A measure of redenomination risk (ECB Working Paper Series 1785/April 2015).
Draghi, M. (2012). Verbatim of the remarks made by Mario Draghi. President of the European central bank at the global investment conference in London. Retrieved July 26, 2012, from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2012/html/sp120726.en.html
Dungey, M, & Zhumabekova, D. (2001). Testing for contagion using correlations: Some words of caution (Pacific Basin Working Paper PB01-09). San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
Dungey, M., Fry, R. A., Gonzalez-Hermosillo, B., & Martin, V. L. (2003). Unanticipated shocks and systemic influences: The impact of contagion in global equity markets in 1998 (IMF Working Papers 03/84).
ECB. (2012). Financial stability review.
Ehrmann, M., Fratzscher, M., Güürkaynak, R. S., & Swanson, E. T. (2011). Convergence and anchoring of yield curves in the Euro area. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 350–364.
Eichengreen, B., Rose, A. K., & Wyplosz, C. (1996). Contagious currency crises (NBER Working Papers 5681).
Engle, R. F. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20, 339–350.
Engle, R. F., & Sheppard, K. (2001). Theoretical and empirical properties of dynamic conditional correlation multivariate GARCH (NBER Working Papers 8554).
Favero, C., Pagano, M., & von Thadden, E. L. (2010). How does liquidity affect government bond yields? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45, 107–134.
Forbes, K., & Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: Measuring stock market co-movements. Journal of Finance, 57, 2223–2261.
Hong, Y. (2001). A test for volatility spillover with application to exchange rates. Journal of Econometrics, 103, 183–224.
Kaminsky, G. L., Reinhart, C. M., & Vegh, C. A. (2003). The unholy trinity of financial contagion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 51–74.
King, M. A., & Wadhwani, S. (1990). Transmission of volatility between stock markets. Review of Financial Studies, 3, 5–33.
Loretan, M., & English, W. B. (2000). Evaluating ‘correlation breakdowns’ during periods of market volatility. In International financial markets and the implications for monetary and financial stability (pp 214–231). Basel: Bank for International Settlements.
Pericoli, M., & Sbracia, M. (2003). A primer on financial contagion. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17, 571–608.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Descriptive Statistics of Bond Yield Data
Appendix 2: Principal Component Analysis
The results of the principal components analysis are presented in Table 6. In total, five principal components are calculated. By filtering the first principal component, we adjust the original time series for a factor which explains 90% of the joint variation. This percentage is reasonably high to conclude that the global factor, i.e. the most important joint driver of all original yield series, is approximated and extracted by the first principal component.
Appendix 3: DCC Coefficients
The estimation results of the DCC model proposed by Engle (2002) and Engle and Sheppard (2001) are provided in Table 7. The modified input variables from Sect. 4.2 are statistically adequate for the DCC model. Based on the single time series, univariate GARCH(1,1) equations are estimated for each country in a first step. Conditional volatilities are assumed to be represented by one lagged news parameter and one lagged decay parameter. In a second step, the GARCH residuals are applied to the multivariate MGARCH(1,1) estimation which models the dynamics of the comovements. The conditional correlations are also modelled with one lagged news parameter and one lagged decay parameter. All parameter estimates of both the univariate and the multivariate estimation are highly significant.
Appendix 4: Country Ratings
Sovereign debt rating downgrades of Ireland, Italy, Portugal or Spain are used as control variables in rating regression (5). An overview of the rating development of those four countries is provided in Fig. 6. No rating development for Germany is displayed as within the observation period there was no downgrade for German sovereign debt which is rated as AAA. The linear rating scale used in Figs. 4 and 6 is described in Table 8.
Appendix 5: Results of Ratings Regression Equation (5) for Control Ratings
Table 9 provides estimates for the control rating dummy from rating regression (5). The respective country’s dummy is used as control variable, that is e.g. in the Irish case the Irish rating dummy serves as control variable in the rating regression of the Greek-Irish correlations. No rating dummy is included in the rating regression for the Greek-German correlations as German debt was not downgraded during the observation time span.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watzka, S. (2017). Contagion Risk During the Euro Area Sovereign Debt Crisis: Greece, Convertibility Risk, and the ECB as Lender of Last Resort. In: Heinemann, F., Klüh, U., Watzka, S. (eds) Monetary Policy, Financial Crises, and the Macroeconomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56261-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56261-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56260-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56261-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)