Abstract
This study introduces a new integrated measurement standard to comprehensively measure sustainability performance . It comprises a balanced scorecard and three internationally leading sustainability standards: Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) , ISO 26000 and United Nation Global Compact (UNGC). These integrated guidelines cover four aspects, economic, social, environmental , and well-being.
Samples were taken from Indonesian companies that had participated in the Indonesia Sustainability Reporting Awards (ISRA). The 2010 and 2011 sustainability reports were examined using these integrated measurement standards (IMS). The results of a content analysis showed that the trend of disclosing sustainability had tended to increase over the past 2 years. The disclosure scores were considered medium to high profile, with the indication that the sustainability performance of state-owned companies was higher than that of private companies; publicly-listed companies obtained higher scores of disclosures than non-listed companies; and manufacturing industries received the highest scores followed by service and energy industries respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Tuwairij, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E., II. (2001). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance and economic performance: A simultaneous equation approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5–6), 447–471.
Beurden, P. V., & Gossling, T. (2008). The worth of value-a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407–424.
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.
Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006a). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies., 43(3), 435–455.
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006b). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7–8), 1168–1188.
Brown, E., & Cloke, J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in higher education. An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 8(3), 474–483.
Butler, J. B., Henderson, S. C., & Raiborn, C. (2011). Sustainability and balanced scorecard; Integrating green measures into business reporting. Management Accounting Quarterly, 12(2), 1–10.
Delai, I., & Takahashi, S. (2011). Sustainability measurement system: A reference model proposal. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 438–471.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.
Edvinsson, L., Dvir, R., Roth, N., & Pasher, E. (2004). Innovations: The new unit of analysis in the knowledge era: The quest and context for innovation efficiency and management of IC. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 40–58.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2001). Socially responsible investment and corporate social and environmental reporting in the UK: An exploratoey study. The British Accounting Review, 33(4), 523–548.
Gates, S., & Germain, C. (2010). Integrating sustainability measures into strategic performance measurement systems: An empirical study. Management Accounting Quarterly, 11(3), 1–7.
Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theory; Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethic, 53, 51–71.
Golob, U., & Barlett, J. L. (2007). Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relation Review, 33(1), 1–9.
Gunawan, J. (2010). Perception of important information in corporate social disclosures: Evidence from Indonesia. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(1), 62–71.
Hanke, T., & Stark, W. (2009). Strategy development: Conceptual framework on corporate social responsibility. Journal Of Business Ethics, 3(5), 21–40.
Hrebicek, J., Soukopva, J., Stencl, M., & Trenz, O. (2011). Integration of economic, environmental, social and corporate governance performance and reporting in enterprises. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, LIX(7), 157–166.
Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–289.
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 455–469.
McLoughin, J., Kaminski, J., & Sodagar, B. (2009). A strategic approach to social impact measurement of social enterprises the SIMPLE methodology. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(2), 154–178.
Meehan, J., Meehan, K., & Richards, A. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: The 3C-SR model. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6), 386–398.
Navissi, F., & Naiker, V. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate value. Journal of Managerial Finance, 32(1), 247–256.
Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(3), 71–88.
Panayiotou, N. A., Aravossis, K., & Moschou, P. (2009a). A new methodology approach for measuring corporate social responsibility performance. Water and Air Soil Pollution: Focus, 9, 129–139.
Panayiotou, N. A., Aravossis, K. G., & Moschou, P. (2009b). Greece: A comparative study of CSR reports. In Global practices of corporate social responsibility (pp. 149–164). Berlin: Springer.
Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). Investing in CSR to enhance customer value. The Harvard Law School Forum, Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation.
Perdana, K., & Gunawan, J. (2014). Integration of Balanced Scorecard, ISO 26000, United Nation Global Compact and Global Reporting Initiatives: Building an Integrated Measurement Standard for Measuring Sustainability Performance. In Proceeding International Conference on Governance. Economic Faculty, Trisakti university, Jakarta ISBN 978-979-3634-24-1.
Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 96(6), 61–78.
Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society. Harvard business review, 84(12), 42–56.
Sharma, D., Borna, S., & Stearns, J. M. (2009). An investigation of the effects of corporate ethical values on employee commitment and performance: Examining the moderating role of perceived fairness. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 251–260.
Siregar, S. V., & Bachtiar, Y. (2010). Corporate social reporting: Empirical evidence from Indonesia stock exchange. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(3), 241–252.
Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
The Performance Indicators of Integrated Measurement Standard
No | Key performance indicators |
---|---|
 | Financial—economy |
1 | Added value and economic distribution |
2 | Cost, earning and profit |
3 | Company financial ratio |
4 | Investors and dividends |
5 | Marketing and selling improvements |
6 | Tax payments |
 | Financial—social |
1 | Public investment |
2 | Indirect economic impact |
3 | Investment to support human rights |
4 | Payment for local distributor |
 | Financial—environment |
1 | Financial and risk implication because of climate change |
2 | Mitigation and adaptation budget to climate change |
3 | Water and energy budget |
4 | R & D budget for air pollution |
5 | Environmental recovery and maintenance budget |
 | Financial—well-being |
1 | To facilitate praying area for employees |
2 | Sports and entertainment facilities |
3 | Donations for natural disasters, social and religion |
4 | Environmental sanity guarantees |
 | Process—economy |
1 | Budgeting affectivity by increasing efficiency |
2 | Budget controlling |
3 | Return of investment for shareholders |
 | Process—social |
1 | Wage is higher than regional wage |
2 | Fight against human trafficking |
3 | Health and safety priority |
4 | Fair performance valuation |
5 | Motivate employee |
6 | Fair job placement |
7 | No intimidation |
8 | No discrimination |
9 | Assurance and pension program |
10 | Company culture |
11 | Freedom of association |
12 | Complaints and grievance |
13 | Security assistance |
14 | Against child labor |
15 | Liberation of slavery |
16 | Discipline and preventive disobedience |
17 | Anti-corruption, bribery and collusion |
18 | Fair competition and anti-monopoly |
19 | Community involvement |
20 | Obedience to government ’s rules |
21 | The decrease of fine/punishment |
22 | Effort of decreasing the negative effects in society |
23 | Woman empowerment |
24 | Supporting the society ’s organization |
25 | Local worker acceptance |
26 | Carrier development |
 | Process—environment |
1 | Decreasing greenhouse effect |
2 | The usage of recycled water |
3 | Renewable and using natural resources consumption |
4 | Energy efficiency |
5 | Impact of transportation vehicles |
6 | The use of renewable material |
7 | Solvency to using dangerous materials |
8 | Abide by environmental legislation |
9 | Minimize the impact on the living ecosystem |
10 | Lowering the significant impact around company area |
11 | No negative impact on protected organisms |
 | Process—well-being |
1 | Employment dialogue |
2 | Commitment to the employee |
3 | Healthy, safe and comfortable working area |
4 | Minimize the possibility of violating human rights |
5 | Establish good relationships with society |
6 | Promote law enforcement |
7 | Integrate human rights into company’s policy |
8 | Copyright |
9 | Children rights fulfillment |
 | Customer —economy |
1 | Creating sustainable market |
2 | Sustainable consumption |
3 | Responsible promotion/advertisement |
4 | Customer ’s satisfaction index |
5 | Excellent after-sales services |
6 | Easy marketing access |
7 | Product quality |
8 | Continuous improvement |
9 | Product reliability |
 | Customer —social |
1 | Brand or product labeling |
2 | Education and awareness |
3 | Response to customer ’s complaints |
 | Customer —environment |
1 | Involving customers in maintaining the environment |
2 | Re-withdrawal packaging |
3 | Innovation of green products |
 | Customer —well-being |
1 | Customer ’s protection and privacy |
2 | Customer ’s health and safety |
 | Learning & development—economy |
1 | Good governance |
2 | Employee’s technology access |
3 | Acknowledge the rights of the community |
 | Learning and development—social |
1 | Training and research for human rights |
2 | Employee’s training and education |
3 | Corporation agreement with employees |
4 | Training and education on anti-corruption |
 | Learning and development—environment |
1 | Initiative in using renewable energy |
2 | Initiative in using renewable materials |
3 | Initiative in preventing pollution /waste |
4 | Initiative in ecosystem recovery |
 | Learning and development—well-being |
1 | Obedience to society ’s norm |
2 | Comprehensive research about the stakeholder |
3 | Anticipate working accidents |
4 | Commitment to public |
5 | Carrier development |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Perdana, K., Gunawan, J. (2017). Proposed Integrated Measurement Standard to Measure Sustainability Performance: Evidence From Indonesia. In: Capaldi, N., Idowu, S., Schmidpeter, R. (eds) Dimensional Corporate Governance. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56182-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56182-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56181-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56182-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)