Skip to main content

Lessons Learned Practice in a Complex Production Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative Quality Improvements in Operations

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 255))

Abstract

Lessons learned practice is a well-known method embraced by many companies to enhance continuous learning in their organizational routines and day-to-day work. The extant literature presents a mix of several lessons learned approaches from different disciplines. However, the approaches fail to address the distinct, complex settings that arise in production and operation phases. Thus, there is a need for rethinking of lessons learned practice in a complex production environments. Based on case studies in the aerospace industry, this chapter presents a new method for lessons learned practice, which includes a standard, seven-step representation format, together with guidelines, using videos as an enabling media. The seven-steps are: lesson learned statement, working context, task description, what went wrong or what went well, lesson learned, lesson learned measures, and applicability and delimitations. The method intends to capture a single learning point with specific recommendations, promoting process-based rather than a project-based learning. The chapter presents results from the validation of this new method in industrial setting. The validation shows that the method is beneficial in capturing lessons from skill-oriented activities in narrative form by visually showing and telling defects, problems, or improvements in complex products and associated actions in production or product support phases. The method supports exploration processes at the individual level with the creation of new knowledge with a richer context and so support exploitation processes and activities at the organizational level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P. S., et al. (2009). Perspectives on the productivity dilemma. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, H. J., Lee, H. J., Cho, K., & Park, S. J. (2005). Utilizing knowledge context in virtual collaborative work. Decision Support Systems, 39(4), 563–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. (2016). Product service system: A conceptual framework from a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1011–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines, T. S., et al. (2007). State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 221(10), 1543–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Balancing act: How to capture knowledge without killing it. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirumalla, K. (2013). Development of a methodology for lessons learned practice: From post-project learning to continuous process-based learning. PhD thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirumalla, K. (2016). Organizing lessons learned practice for product-service innovation. Journal of Business Research, 69, 4986–4991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, A. Y. K., Lam, W., & Majid, S. (2006). Knowledge reuse in action: The case of CALL. Journal of Information Science, 32, 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. (2008). Perspective: The Stage-Gate® idea-to-launch process-update, what’s new, and NexGen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbally, M. A. (2005). Considering video production? Lessons learned from the production of a blood pressure measurement video. Nurse Education in Practice, 5(6), 375–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, B. (1994). Multimedia and its impact on training engineers. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6(2), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizing learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14(3), 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garratt, B. (1990). Creating the learning organization. London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffin, K., et al. (2010). Managing lessons learned and tacit knowledge in new product development. Research-Technology Management, 53(4), 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, Y. M., & McMahon, C. (2009). Improving reuse of in-service information capture and feedback. Journal of Manufacturing Technology, 20(5), 626–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkuhl, G., & Braf, E. (2001). Contextual knowledge analysis—Understanding knowledge and its relations to action and communication. In Proceedings of 2nd European Conference on Knowledge Management, IEDC-Bled School of Management, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hislop, D. (2013). Knowledge Management in Organizations: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotnour, T. (1999). A learning framework for project management. Project Management Journal, 30(2), 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotnour, T., & Vergopia, C. (2005). Learning-based project reviews: Observations and lessons learned from the Kennedy Space Center. Engineering Management Journal, 17(4), 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world class great manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masood, T., et al. (2014). Integrating through-life engineering service knowledge with product design and manufacture. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 28, 59–74. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2014.900858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, N. (2010). The lessons learned handbook: Practical knowledge-based approach to learning from experience. Oxford: Chandos Publishing Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell, C., & Hubert, C. (2011). The new edge in knowledge: How knowledge management is changing the way we do business. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large scale production. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paranagamage, P., Carrillo, P., Ruikar, K., & Fuller, P. (2012). Lessons learned practices in the UK construction sector: Current practice and proposed improvements. The Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2, 216–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L., & Dawson, R. (2013). Lessons learned from lessons learned. Journal of Knowledge and Process Management, 20(3), 154–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough, H., et al. (2004). Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1579–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif, M. N. A., et al. (2005). Facilitating knowledge sharing through lessons learned system. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 3, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styhre, A., Josephson, P.-E., & Knauseder, I. (2006). Organizational learning in non-writing communities: The case of construction workers. Management Learning, 37(1), 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H. C., et al. (2006). Live capture and reuse of project knowledge in construction Organisations. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(2), 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomke, S., & Fujimoto, T. (2000). The effect of “front-loading” problem-solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(2), 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R., Aha, D. W., & Becerra-Fernandez, I. (2001). Intelligent lessons learned systems. Journal of Expert Systems Research & Applications, 20(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiktorsson, M. (2014). Consideration of legacy structures enabling a double helix development of production systems and products. In P. Paulo & S. Arlindo (Eds.), Technology and manufacturing process selection: The product life cycle perspective (pp. 21–32).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (2008). How do organizations learn lessons from projects-and do they? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2), 248–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, N., Rust, C., & Horne, G. (2009). A tacit understanding: The designer’s role in capturing and passing on the skilled knowledge of master craftsmen. Journal of Design, 3(3), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylirisku, S. P., & Buur, J. (2007). Designing with video. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koteshwar Chirumalla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chirumalla, K. (2017). Lessons Learned Practice in a Complex Production Environment. In: Backström, T., Fundin, A., Johansson, P. (eds) Innovative Quality Improvements in Operations. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 255. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55985-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics