Skip to main content

Comparison of Cluster Analysis Approaches for Binary Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Classification, (Big) Data Analysis and Statistical Learning
  • 3514 Accesses

Abstract

Cluster methods allow to partition observations into homogeneous groups. Standard cluster analysis approaches consider the variables used to partition observations as continuous. In this work, we deal with the particular case all variables are binary. We focused on two specific methods that can handle binary data: the monothetic analysis and the model-based co-clustering. The aim is to compare the outputs performing these two methods on a common dataset, and figure out how they differ. The dataset on which the two methods are performed is a UNESCO dataset made up of 58 binary variables concerning the ability of UNESCO management to use Internet to promote world heritage sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bastida, U., Huan, T.C.: Performance evaluation of tourism websites’ information quality of four global destination brands: Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Taipei. J. Business Res. 67(2), 167–170 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhatia, P., Iovleff, S., Govaert, G.: blockcluster: an r package for model based co-clustering. J. Stat. Software 76(9), 1–24 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenwood, M.C.: A comparison of plots for monothetic clustering, with applications to microbial communities and educational test development. Electron. J. Appl. Stat. Anal. 5(1), 1–14 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ismail, N., Masron, T., Ahmad, A.: Cultural heritage tourism in malaysia: Issues and challenges. In: SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 12, p. 01059. EDP Sciences (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.J.: Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis, vol. 344. Wiley, USA (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Law, R., Qi, S., Buhalis, D.: Progress in tourism management: a review of website evaluation in tourism research. Tourism management 31(3), 297–313 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., Hornik, K.: cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 1(4) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patuelli, R., Mussoni, M., Candela, G.: The effects of world heritage sites on domestic tourism: a spatial interaction model for Italy. J. Geographical Syst. 15(3), 369–402 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Richards, G.: Production and consumption of european cultural tourism. Ann. Tourism Res. 23(2), 261–283 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. World Heritage Committee: Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World heritage Convention. Unesco World Heritage Centre (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, Q., DeSantis, R.: Usability issues in city tourism web site design: a content analysis. In: IPCC 2005. Proceedings. International Professional Communication Conference, 2005., 789–796. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Contu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Contu, G., Frigau, L. (2018). Comparison of Cluster Analysis Approaches for Binary Data. In: Mola, F., Conversano, C., Vichi, M. (eds) Classification, (Big) Data Analysis and Statistical Learning. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55708-3_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics