Abstract
In Danish and Swedish ethical and media debates, uterine transplants, in sharp contrast to commercial surrogacy, get positioned as a maternal gift-giving act. We argue that uterine transplants become (unlike commercial surrogacy arrangements) positioned in the private , intimate sphere of an individual known living donor (frequently the woman’s mother, a sibling, mother-in-law, or a friend) donating her viable but no longer individually needed uterus to help a known recipient (daughter, sister, daughter-in-law, or friend) experience pregnancy and birth. We propose the concept of bio-intimacy to help make sense of the ways that the uterus, upon separation from the older woman’s body, achieves discursive and material agency while it, in commercial surrogacy cases, is reframed as the exploitation of a less empowered, non-intimate other woman.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almeling, R. (2009). Gender and the value of bodily goods: Commodification in egg and sperm donation. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72(3), 37–58.
Anna. (2014, October 23). “Annas” egen berättelse’ [‘Anna’s own story], Smer.se. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://sahlgrenska.gu.se/forskning/uterus/patientberattelse.
Asplund, K., Eriksson, L., & Hermerén, G. (2013, October 16). Efter Smers rapport: Livlig samhällsdebatt om assisterad berfuktning [‘After the smer report: Lively public debate about assisted reproduction’], Smer.se. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.smer.se/artiklar/efter-smers-rapport-livlig-samhallsdebatt-om-assisterad-befruktning/.
Associated Press. (2015, August 25). Swedish woman who gave birth after womb transplant from own mother speaks of joy. The Telegraph. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/sweden/11824261/Swedish-woman-who-gave-birth-after-womb-transplant-from-own-mother-speaks-of-joy.html.
Beausang, A. et al. (2014, June 23). Aldrig en rättighet att köpa ett barn [Never a right to by a child], Aftonbladet. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.aftonbladet.se/debatt/article19102125.ab.
Bengtsson, A. (2013, March 2). Surrogatfödda barn mår inte sämre än andra [Children born trough surrogacy are no worse than other’], Svenska Dagbladet. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.svd.se/surrogatfodda-barn-mar-inte-samre-an-andra/om/debatt.
Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 281–288.
Berlant, L. (2008). The female complaint. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bharadwaj, A. (2012). The other mother: Supplementary wombs and the surrogate state in India. In M. Knect, M. Klotz, & S. Beck (Eds.), Reproductive technologies as global form: Ethnographies of knowledge, practices, and transnational encounters (pp. 139–160). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Brännström, M. (2015). The Swedish uterus transplantation project: The story behind the Swedish uterus transplantation project. AOGS. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 94(7), 675–679.
Brunius, Å., Lindberg, J., Esteche, A., Hagelstedt, Å. & Stenudd, S. (2011, April 6). Surrogatmödraskp kan visst funka! [Surrogacy might work1]. Flamman. http://flamman.se/_a/surrogatmodraskpa-kan-viss-funka.
Chatta om livmodertransplantationer [Chat about uterine transplantations]. (2012). Dagens Nyheter, 20. September. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.dn.se/chattar/chattarkiv/chatta-om-livmodertransplantationer/.
Cohen, L. (2004). Operability, bioavailability, and exception. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 79–90). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Cooper, M., & Waldby, C. (2014). Clinical labor. Tissue donors and research subjects in the global bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Danish Ethical Council. (2008, May 21). Det Etiske Råds udtalelse om rugemødre [The ethical council’s statement on surrogate mothers’]. Det Etiske Råd. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.etiskraad.dk/~/media/Etisk-Raad/Etiske-Temaer/Assisteret-reproduktion/Publikationer/2008-05-21-udtalelse-om-rugemoedre.pdf.
DasGupta, S., & Dasgupta, S. D. (2010). Motherhood jeopardized: Reproductive technologies in Indian communities. In W. Chavkin & J. M. Maher (Eds.), The globalization of motherhood: Deconstructions and reconstructions of biology and care (pp. 131–153). New York: Routledge.
Dickenson, D. (2009). Body shopping: Converting body parts to profit. Oxford: Oneworld Books.
Eng, D. L. (2010). The feeling of kinship: Queer liberalism and the racialization of intimacy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fahlén, M., & Åström, G. (2013, February 8). Kvinnors kroppar är inte bara en behållare [Women’s bodies are not just containers]. Svenska Dagbladet. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.svd.se/kvinnors-kroppar-ar-inte-bara-en-behallare.
Fox, R., & Swazey, J. P. (1992). Spare parts: Organ replacement in American Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied progress: A cultural account of assisted conception. London: Routledge.
Gupta, J., & Richters, A. (2008). Embodied subjects and fragmented objects: Women’s bodies, assisted reproduction technologies and the right to self-determination. Bioethical Inquiry, 5(4), 239–249.
Halberstam, J. (2005). In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York: New York University Press.
Hoeyer, K. (2013). Exchanging human bodily material: Rethinking bodies and markets. New York: Springer.
Johansson, U., & Holmström, S. (2010, May 30). Tillåt kvinnor bliver surrogatmödrar [Allow women to become surrogate mothers]. Svenska Dagbladet. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.svd.se/tillat-kvinnor-bli-surrogatmodrar/om/debatt.
Jorgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. (1999). Diskursanalyse som teori og metode. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
Juliussen, S. (2015, December 1). Rugemødre—ja tak! [Surrogate mothers—yes, please!]. Søren Juliussen’s blog. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://sorenjuliussen.dk/2015/12/01/rugemoedre-ja-tak/.
Junker, S. (2013, December 18). Flertal i Etisk Råd åbner dør på klem for surrogatmødre [Majority opens the door for surrogate mothers]. Information. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.information.dk/482390.
Kroløkke, C. (2018). Global fluids. The cultural politics of reproductive waste and value. New York: Berghahn Press.
Kroløkke, C., & Madsen, K. H. (2014). Moderskab(elser)—slægtskabsøkonomier og moderfølelser i transnational surrogatmoderskab [Making motherhood—kinship economies and mother feelings in transnational surrogate motherhood]. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 14(1–2), 70–81.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and the social strategy. London: Verso.
Lash, S., & Lury, C. (2007). Global culture industry: The mediation of things. Malden, MA: Polity.
Lind, L. E. (2014, June 3). Etisk debat om livmoderdonation [Ethical debate on uterine transplantation], Etik.dk. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.etik.dk/danmark/2014-06-03/etisk-debat-om-liv-moder-donation.
Martensen, N. (2016, January 11). Etisk Råd-formand: Det reducerer kvinden til en beholder til børn [Head of Ethical Council: It reduces the woman to a container for children]. Politiken. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://politiken.dk/indland/ECE3009696/etisk-raad-formand-det-reducerer-kvinden-til-en-beholder-til-boern/.
Munter, D. (2014, May 9). Avfärda inte kommersiellt surrogatmödreskap [Do not dismiss commercial surrogacy]. Dagens Arena. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.dagensarena.se/opinion/dan-munter-avfarda-inte-kommersiellt-surrogatmodraskap/.
Nebeling Petersen, M. (2015). Moren er død, moren leve. Kampen om moderskab hos homoseksuelle mænd [The mother is dead, long live the mother. The battle of motherhood among homosexual men]. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 15(2): 34–48.
Nebeling Petersen, M., Kroløkke, C., & Myong, L. (2016). Dad and daddy assemblages. Re-Suturing the Nation through transnational surrogacy, homosexuality, and norwegian exceptionalism. GLQ—A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies, 23(1), 42.
Nordgren, M. (2014, June 13). Surrogatmödraskap het fråga på kvinnokonference [Surrogacy a heated question on women’s conference]. Dagens Nytheter. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.dn.se/livsstil/surrogatmodraskap-het-fraga-pa-kvinnokonferens/.
Novas, C. (2006). The political economy of hope: Patients’ organizations science and biovalue. BioSocieties, 1, 289–305.
Orange, R., & Macrae, F. (2015, September 20). ‘Celebrating turning one, the first baby born after womb transplant: Mother speaks of ‘fantastic feeling’ following pioneering project that saw four children born’. The Daily Mail. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3242477/Celebrating-turning-one-baby-born-womb-transplant-Mother-speaks-fantastic-feeling-following-pioneering-project-saw-four-children-born.html.
Pabst, M. (2016, February 4). Christine vil føde barn med en anden kvindes livmoder [Christine wants to give birth with another woman’s uturus], Kristeligt Dagblad. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/danmark/danske-kvinder-kan-snart-foede-med-en-andens-livmoder.
Pande, A. (2010). Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect mother-worker. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(4), 969–992.
Parry, B. (2007). Entangled exchange: Reconceptualising the characterisation and practice of bodily commodification. Geoforum, 39, 1133–1144.
Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2011). Mr Tati’s holiday and Joao’s Safari—Seeing the world through transplant tourism. Body & Society, 17(2–3), 55–92.
Sjödin, A. (2011, May 16). De fick barn via surrogatmamma i Indien [They had a child via surrogate mother in India], Arbetarbladet. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.arbetarbladet.se/allmant/de-fick-barn-via-surrogatmamma-i-indien.
Titmuss, R. M. (1970). The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. London: Allen & Unwin.
Vestlund, J. (2013, January 17). Surrogatmödraskap—en vigtig hbt-fråga i samtiden [Surrogacy—an important contemporary question]. QX. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.qx.se/samhalle/debatt/22547/surrogatmodraskap-–-en-viktig-hbtfraga-i-samtiden.
Waldby, C. (2000). The visible human project: Informatic bodies and posthuman medicine. London: Routledge.
Westergaard, T. (2015, November 30). Barnløse bøsser kæmper for retten til at få børn [Childless gay men fight for the right to get children]. DR. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/barnloese-boesser-kaemper-retten-til-faa-boern.
Wicklund, L. (2010, October 12). Surrogatmödraskap har blivit en global industri [Surrogacy has become a global industry]. Dagens Nyheter. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://www.dn.se/insidan/surrogatmodraskap-har-blivit-en-global-industri/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kroløkke, C., Petersen, M.N. (2017). Keeping it in the Family: Debating the Bio-intimacy of Uterine Transplants and Commercial Surrogacy. In: Shaw, R. (eds) Bioethics Beyond Altruism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55531-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55532-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)