Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conditions for Governance of Tenure in Lagoon-Based Small-Scale Fisheries, India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines

Part of the book series: MARE Publication Series ((MARE,volume 14))

  • 827 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter begins by confirming that issues around tenure within lagoon-based small-scale fisheries context have largely been neglected. Despite a growing body of literature on lagoon commons and property rights systems, existing literature on marine and terrestrial tenure tend to subsume tenure issues of coastal lagoons. Lack of specific attention to lagoon tenure can potentially affect their long-term sustainability and further marginalize small-scale fishers that have depended on them for generations. This chapter identifies important challenges associated with lagoon tenure in relation to the implementation of the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication (SSF Guidelines), particularly focusing on its provisions for responsible governance of tenure. The tenure provisions in the SSF Guidelines highlight that small-scale fishing communities need to have secure tenure rights to resources that form the basis for their social, economic, and cultural wellbeing, and that the state should recognize and ensure such rights. To this effect, the chapter sets forth some of the key conditions for governance of tenure in the context of lagoon small-scale fisheries social-ecological systems through an extensive treatment of a broad range of fishers’ rights and multi actor responsibilities. Fisher experiences with the impacts of ongoing rapid social-ecological changes on lagoon tenure and community responses in Chilika Lagoon, Bay of Bengal, India region is used as a case. Data analyzed in this chapter comes from a series of workshops, meetings, and consultations with small-scale fishers and other stakeholders in Chilika. The chapter offers important lessons for governance of lagoon tenure by highlighting its key connections with resource systems, resource sectors, and user-level dynamics, to offer insights on possible institutional and governance arrangements around secure lagoon tenure. Further, it provides suggestions and reflections on the specific characteristics of lagoon small-scale fisheries tenure and possible future directions for governance. Despite its specific focus on lagoon systems, the main learnings about the key conditions, characteristics, and governance directions of small-scale fisheries tenure provides crucial insights on successful implementation of the SSF Guidelines, especially its tenure provisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lagoons are shallow coastal bodies of water separated from the ocean by a series of barrier islands which lie parallel to the shoreline. Inlets, either natural or man-made, cut through barrier islands and permit tidal currents to transport water into and out of the lagoons. Because lagoons are characteristically shallow, they are strongly influenced by precipitation and evaporation, which results in fluctuating water temperature and salinity. Lagoons can also be fragile ecosystems susceptible to pollution effects from municipal, industrial, and agricultural runoff (Hill 2001).

References

  • Adger, N. (2001). Scales of governance and environmental justice for adaptation and mitigation of climate change. Journal of International Development, 13, 921–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. (2003). Building resilience to promote sustainability. International Human Dimensions Programme IHDP Update, 2, 1–3. Update 02/2003:1–3, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2006). The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 9. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art9/ . Accessed 9 Dec 2016.

  • Agrawal, A. (2002). Common resources and institutional sustainability. In O. E. T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. U. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 41–86). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, E., Perry, A. L., Badjeck, M. C., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Conway, D., Halls, A. S., Pilling, G. M., Reynolds, J. D., Andrew, N. L., & Dulvy, N. K. (2009). Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 10(2), 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almudi, T., & Berkes, F. (2010). Barriers to empowerment: Fighting eviction for conservation in a southern Brazilian protected area. Local Environment, 15(3), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almudi, T., & Kalikoski, D. (2010). Traditional fisherfolk and no-take protected areas: The Peixe Lagoon National Park dilemma. Ocean and Coastal Management, 53, 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Political Science, 41, 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrachuk, M., & Armitage, D. (2015). Understanding social-ecological change and transformation through community perceptions of system identity. Ecology and Society, 20(4), 26. doi:10.5751/ES-07759-200426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R. S. K. (1980). Coastal lagoons (p. 106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BĂ©nĂ©, C., Macfadyen, G., & Allison, E.H. (2007). Increasing the contribution of small-scale fisheries to poverty alleviation and food security (Fisheries Technical Paper No. 481, 124 pp). Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benessaiah, K., & Sengupta, R. (2014). How is shrimp aquaculture transforming coastal livelihoods and lagoons in Estero Real, Nicaragua? The need to integrate social–ecological research and ecosystem-based approaches. Environmental Management, 54(2), 162–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15188–15193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2011). Restoring unity: The concept of marine social-ecological systems. In R. Ommer, I. Perry, P. Cury, & K. Cochrane (Eds.), World fisheries: A social-ecological analysis (pp. 9–28). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. E. (2010). Polycentrism and flux in spatialised management: Evidence from Maine’s lobster (Homarus americanus) fishery. Bulletin of Marine Science, 86(2), 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. L. (1991). Bridging organisations and sustainable development. Human Relations; Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 44(8), 807–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D. W. (2001). In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information: Agricultural extension and boundary organisations. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26, 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D. W., & Moser, S. C. (2000). Linking global and local scales: Designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change, 10, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D. W., Adger, W., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., & Young, O. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/. Accessed 9 Dec 2016.

  • Coulthard, S. (2008). Adapting to environmental change in artisanal fisheries – Insights from a South Indian lagoon. Global Environmental Change, 18(3), 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, S. (2011). More than just access to fish: The pros and cons of fisher participation in a customary marine tenure (Padu) system under pressure. Marine Policy, 35(3), 405–412. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2010.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dujovny, E. (2009). The deepest cut: Political ecology in the dredging of a new sea mouth in Chilika Lake, Orissa, India. Conservation and Society, 7, 192–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2015). Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelcich, S., Edward-Jones, G., Kaiser, M. J., & Castilla, J. C. (2006). Co-management policy can reduce resilience in traditionally managed marine ecosystems. Ecosystems, 9, 951–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, D. H. (1999). Stabilizing the boundary between politics and science: The role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science, 29, 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Johansson, K. (2006). Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34, 573–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. (2001). The Indian River Lagoon species inventory: What is a lagoon? Smithsonian Marine Station, USA. http://www.sms.si.edu/irlspec/Whatsa_lagoon.htm. Accessed 9 Dec 2016.

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huong, T. T. T., & Berkes, F. (2011). Diversity of resource use and property rights in Tam Giang Lagoon, Vietnam. International Journal of the Commons, 5(1), 130–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, R. E. (1978). Reef and lagoon tenure systems in the Pacific islands. South Pacific Bulletin, 4, 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, R. E. (1981). Words of the lagoon: Fishing and marine lore in the Palau District of Micronesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J. J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N. M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G. C., GrĂĽbler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodah, N. S., Kasperson, R. E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore, B., O’Riordan, T., & Svedin, U. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292, 641–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurien, J., & Willmann, R. (2009). Special considerations for small-scale fisheries management in developing countries. In K. L. Cochrane & S. M. Garcia (Eds.), A fishery manager’s handbook (2nd ed., pp. 404–424). Chichester: FAO/Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, L., Garden, P., & Imamura, M. (2005). The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art18/. Accessed 9 Dec 2016.

  • Lele, S. (2000). Godsend, sleight of hand, or just muddling through: Joint water and forest management in India. In ODI natural resource perspectives (Vol. 53, pp. 1–6). London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, M. D. (Ed.). (2000). Polycentric games and institutions: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2003). Ecosystems and human wellbeing: A framework for assessment. Chapter 5: Dealing with Scale. In Millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: General synthesis. In Millennium ecosystem assessment. Chicago: Island Press. http://www.Millenniumassessment.org/en/Synthesis.aspx. Accessed 9 Dec 2016.

  • Meinzen-Dick, R. (2007). Beyond panaceas in water institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104(39), 15200–15205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, B. K. (1996). Reframing protest: The politics of livelihood and ecology in two environmental movements in India. Doctoral thesis, Cornell University. 270 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., & Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. New York: Published for the World Bank, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. K. (2003). Community-based forest management in India: The significance of tenure. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 13, 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. K. (2011). Change and marginalisation: Livelihoods, commons institutions and environmental justice in Chilika Lagoon, India. Doctoral thesis, University of Manitoba, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. K. (2014). The Chilika Lagoon social-ecological system: an historical analysis. Ecology and Society, 19(1), 1. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05978-190101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. K. (2015). Institutional Pluralism, Multilevel Arrangements and Polycentricism: The Case of Chilika Lagoon, India. In M. Bavinck & A. Jyotishi (Eds.), Conflict, negotiations and natural resource management: A legal pluralism perspective from India (pp. 148–177). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. K., & Berkes, F. (2008). Politics of cooptation: Self-organized community forest management and joint forest management in Orissa, India. Environmental Management, 41, 707–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. K., & Berkes, F. (2010). Whose marginalisation? Politics around environmental injustices in India’s Chilika Lagoon. Local Environment, 15(6), 553–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. K., & Berkes, F. (2011). Commonisation and decommonisation: Understanding the processes of change in Chilika Lagoon, India. Conservation and Society, 9(2), 132–145. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.83723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. K., & Berkes, F. (2014). Linking global drivers with local and regional change: A social-ecological system approach in Chilika Lagoon, Bay of Bengal. Regional Environmental Change, 14(6), 2067–2078. doi:10.1007/s10113-012-0369-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. K., Oliveira, L. E., & Berkes, F. (2014). Resource degradation, marginalization, and poverty in small-scale fisheries: Threats to social-ecological resilience in India and Brazil. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 73. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06656-190273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. K., Armitage, D., & Andrachuk, M. (2016). Power and politics of social–ecological regime shifts in the Chilika lagoon, India and Tam Giang lagoon, Vietnam. Regional Environmental Change, 16(2), 325–339. doi:10.1007/s10113-015-0775-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakerson, R. (1999). Governing local public economies: Creating the civic metropolis. Oakland: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284, 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Janssen, M. A., & Anderies, J. M. (2007). Going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104(39), 15176–15178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, S. (2003a). Globalization and a grassroots environmental movement: The case of Chilika Bachao Andolan (CBA). Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society, 38(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, S. (2003b). Development, globalization and the rise of a grassroots environmental movement: The case of Chilika Bachao Andolan (CBA) in eastern India. The Indian Journal of Public Administration, XLIX, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, S. (2007). Conservation of environment and protection of marginalized fishing communities of Lake Chilika in Orissa, India. Journal of Human Ecology, 22(4), 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, K. J., Grainger, R., & Crispoldi-Hotta, A. (1998). Current methods and constraints for monitoring production from inland capture fisheries and aquaculture. In T. Peter (Ed.), Inland fishery enhancements (FAO Fisheries Technical Paper T374). Papers presented at the FAO/DFID Expert Consultation on Inland Fishery Enhancements, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 7–11 Apr 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, C. S. (2002). Social ecological dynamics in management systems: Investigating a coastal lagoon fishery in Southern Brazil (265 pp). Doctoral thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Hovelsrud-Broda, G. K., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Mathiesen, S., Naylor, R., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., Schiller, A., Selin, H., & Tyler, N. (2003). Science and technology for sustainable development special feature: Illustrating the coupled human-environment systems for vulnerability analysis. Three case studies. Proceedings of Nation Academy of Science U S A, 100, 808085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Barrett, S., Polasky, S., Galaz, V., Folke, C., Engström, G., Ackerman, F., Arrow, K., Carpenter, S., Chopra, K., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Hughes, T., Kautsky, N., Levin, S., Mäler, K., Shogren, J., Vincent, J., Xepapadeas, T., & Zeeuw, A. (2009). Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions. Science, 325(5946), 1345–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiber, M. G., Young, S., & Wilson, L. (2012). Impact of aquaculture on commercial fisheries: Fishermen’s local ecological knowledge. Human Ecology, 40(1), 29–40. doi:10.1007/s10745-011-9450-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay and scale. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Environment, School of Environment, Enterprise and Development, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    Prateep Kumar Nayak

Authors
  1. Prateep Kumar Nayak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prateep Kumar Nayak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Norwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

    Svein Jentoft

  2. Department of Geography, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

    Ratana Chuenpagdee

  3. Development and Knowledge Sociology Working Group, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research – ZMT, Bremen, Germany

    María José Barragán-Paladines

  4. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy

    Nicole Franz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nayak, P.K. (2017). Conditions for Governance of Tenure in Lagoon-Based Small-Scale Fisheries, India. In: Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Barragán-Paladines, M., Franz, N. (eds) The Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines. MARE Publication Series, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55073-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55074-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation