Skip to main content

Biodiversity Conservation: Habitats and Plant Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Vegetation of the Iberian Peninsula

Part of the book series: Plant and Vegetation ((PAVE,volume 13))

  • 1119 Accesses

Abstract

The CORINE programme and the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) are the two pillars on which conservationist policy is sustained in the European Union, currently composed of 28 member states. In the European context, Spain’s environmental diversity is the cause of its great biological diversity (habitats, flora and fauna). A large part of this diversity is found in the Natura 2000 national network. The list of natural habitats in Spain reaches almost 350; these correspond to more than 1600 plant communities. The basis for the definition of the habitats included in annex I of Directive 92/43/EECis primarily based on phytosociological units, specifically alliances. The degree of accuracy of the alliances to define the vegetation and habitats can be improved. This is why a definition of the habitats through partnerships is proposed, instead of the definitions provided by alliances, in order to ensure efficiency and adequacy of the reality of the conservation policies. Regarding the criteria and ranks used in the risk extinction analysis in plant communities, many of existing proposals are based on the Extent of Occurrence, Area of Occupancy and the rate of decline of these parameters. When it comes to ranks, the ones used by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) are generally followed. The criteria proposed by Izco (Plant Biosyst. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.10009, 2015) are applied to this analysis. As a model for this proposal about the risk of extinction in plant communities, data about the application to the Spanish gypsum bushes of the Gypsophiletalia struthium are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adis J (2001) Arthropods (terrestrial), amazonian. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, vol 1. Academic, San Diego, pp 245–253

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arnáiz C (1981) Utilización de criterios ecológicos para la valoración del territorio. In: Géhu J-M, Pelt J-M (eds) L’evaluation biologique du territoire par la méthode des indices biocenotiques. Inst. Européen d’Écologie, Metz, pp 119–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardat J, Bioret F, Botineau M et al (2010) Prodrome des Végétations de France. http://habitats-naturels.fr/prodrome/prod_index.htm. Accessed 2010 Nov 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson JS, Allen CB, Togher C et al (2006) New South Wales Vegetation Classification and Assessment: Part 1 plant communities of the NSW Western Plains. Cunninghamia 9(3):383–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg C, Abdank A, Isermann M et al (2014) Red lists and conservation prioritization of plant communities – a methodological framework. Appl Veg Sci 17:504–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi E, Blasi C, Allegreza M et al (2014) Plant communities of Italy: the vegetation prodrome. Plant Biosyst 148(3–4):728–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bioret F, Gaudillat V, Royer J-M (2013) The prodrome of French vegetation: a national synsystem for phytosociological knowledge and management issues. Plant Sociol 50(1):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies CE, Moss D, Hill MO (2004). EUNIS Habitat classification Revised 2004. European Environment Agency, European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, p 310

    Google Scholar 

  • Dengler J, Jansen F, Glöckler F et al (2011) The global index of vegetation-plot databases (GIVD): a new resource for vegetation science. J Veg Sci 22(4):582–597. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01265.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devillers P, Devillers-Terschuren J (1996) A classification of Palaearctic habitats. Nature and environment, 78. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, p 194

    Google Scholar 

  • Devillers P, Devillers-Terschuren J, Ledant J-P et al (1991) CORINE biotopes manual. Habitats of the European Community. Data specifications – Part 2.EUR 12587/3. European Commission, Luxembourg, p 300

    Google Scholar 

  • Devillers P, Devillers-Terschuren J, Vander Linden C (2001) PHYSIS Palaearctic habitat classification. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld D (1981) The arrogance of humanism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 304

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1999) Interpretation manual of European Union habitats. EUR 15/2. European Comission, DG XII. Natura 2000, p 119

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido JA, Martínez F, Pérez-García FJ et al (2011) La vegetación del orden Gypsophiletalia: matorrales sobre yeso. In: Mota JF, Sánchez P, Guirado JA (eds) Diversidad vegetal de las yeseras ibéricas. El reto de los archipiélagos edáficos para la biología de la conservación. ADIF-Mediterráneo Asesores Consultores, Almería, pp 511–525. p 636

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Population and community biology. Series 13. Chapman & Hall, London, p 205

    Google Scholar 

  • Géhu J-M (1979) Étude phytocoenotique analytique et globale de l’ensemble des vases et prés salés et saumâtres de la façade atlantique française. Ministère de L’Environnement.Rapport de synthèse/Université de Lille II et Station de Phytosociologie, Bailleul, p 514

    Google Scholar 

  • Géhu J-M (2006) Dictionnaire de sociologie et synécologie végétales. J. Cramer, Berlin, p 899

    Google Scholar 

  • Géhu J-M, Géhu-Frank J (1981) Essai d’évaluation biologique des milieux naturels. Examples littoraux. Séminaire de Phytosociologie appliquée. Inst. Européen d’Ecologie, Metz

    Google Scholar 

  • Géhu J-M, Géhu-Frank J (1991) Essai d’évaluation phytocoenotique de l’artificialisation des paysages. Colloques Phytosociologiques 17:479–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Géhu J-M, Rivas-Martínez S (1981) Notions fondamentales de phytosociologie. In: Dierschke H (ed.) Ber. Int Symp Rinteln Syntaxonomie, (1980). Cramer, Vaduz, pp 5–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood VH, Baste I (1995) Global biodiversity assessment: introduction. In: Heywood VH (ed) Global biodiversity assessment, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Izco J (1998) Types of rarity of plant communities. J Veg Sci 9:641–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izco J (2015) Risk of extinction of plant communities: risk and assessment categories. Plant Biosyst. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.10009

  • Izco J, Amigo J (2011) Syntaxonomical diversity: relationships between syntaxa richness and area. Plant Biosyst 145(Suppl):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köppel C (2002) [‘2000’]. Die Rote Listen der Pflanzengesellschaften in Europa – eine Literatur-Synopse. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 35:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1970) A Sand County Almanac and sketches here and there, First edition 1949. Sierra Club, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loidi J (2004) Phytosociology and biodiversity: an undissociable relationship. Fitosociologia 41(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy TE (1980) Foreword. In: Soule MED, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: an evolutionary ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Suderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinson RO (2008) A directory of conservation-status listing processes for threatened Australian plant species and ecological communities. Australian Plant Conserv 17(2):1–32. Available: http://www.anbg.gov.au. Accessed 25 Feb 2013

  • Marsh GP (1864) Man and nature; or, physical geography as modified by human action. C. Scribner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxted N (2001) Ex situ, in situ conservation. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, 2, 683-695. Academic. San Diego, p 826.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan DS, Ronals IE (2000) Classification and management of rare ecosystems in British Columbia. In: Darling LM (ed) Proceedings of biology and management on species and habitats in risk, vol 1. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks/University College of the Cariboo, Kamloops/Victoria, pp 113–120. Available: http://www.env.gob.bc.ca. Accessed 25 Feb 2013

  • Meine C (2001) Historical conservation movement. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, vol 1. Academic, San Diego, pp 883–896

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Fernández AJ, Martínez F, Pérez FJ et al (2015) Extreme habitat loss in a Mediterranean habitat: Maytenus senegalensis subsp. europaea. Plant Biosyst. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.995146

  • MMA (2003) Atlas y manual de los hábitats de España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, p 492

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec J et al (1983) Rostlinná společenstva České socialiscké republiky a jejich ohrožení [Red list of plant communities of the Czech Socialist Republic and their endargement]. Severočes. Přir., Litoměřice, Suppl

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec J et al (1995) Rostlinná společenstva České republiky a jejich ohrožení [Red list of plant communities of the Czech Republic and their endargement], 2nd ed. Severočes. Přir., Praha, p 206

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno JC (ed) (2008) Lista Roja 2008 de la flora vascular española. Dirección General de Medio Natural y Política Forestal (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino, y Sociedad Española de Biología de la Conservación de Plantas). Madrid, p 86

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L (1997) Conspectus of classes of European vegetation. Folia Geobot Phytotax 32:117–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L (2001) Ecosystems of Europe. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, vol 2. Academic, San Diego, pp 635–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L, Grabherr G et al (eds). (1993) Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österrreichs. I–III. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, pp 587, 323, 353

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson E, Keith DA, Wilcove DS (2009) Assessing the threat status of ecological communities. Conserv Biol 23(2):259–274. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01158.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH (2001) Aesthetic factors. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, vol 1. Academic, San Diego, pp 45–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Penas A, del Río S, Herrero L (2005) A new methodology for the quantitative evaluation of the conservation status of vegetation: the Potenciality Distance Index (PDI). Fitosociologia 42(2):23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz DS (1981) Seven forms of rarity. In: Synge H (ed) The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. Wiley, Chichester, pp 205–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey JM, Scheiner SM, García M, Levassor C (1999) Commonness and rarity: theory and application of a new model to Mediterranean montane grasslands. Conserv Biol 3(1):5. http://www.consecol.org/vol13/iss1/art5

  • Riecken U, Finck P, Raths U et al (2009) German Red Data Book on endangered habitats (short version). https://www.bfn.de

  • Rivas-Martínez S, Fernández-González F, Loidi J, Lousã M, Penas A (2001) Syntaxonomical checklist of vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal to association level. Itinera Geobotanica 14:5–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas-Martínez S, Díaz TE, Fernández-González F, Izco J, Loidi J, Lousã M, Penas A (2002) Vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal. Addenda to the syntaxonomical checklist of 2001. Itinera Geobotanica 15(1):3–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas-Martínez S et al (2007a) Mapa de series, geoseries y geopermaseries de vegetación de España. Parte I. Itinera Geobotanica 17:1–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas-Martínez S, Izco J, Alcaraz F (2007b) Glosario terminológico. In S. Rivas-Martínez et coautores. Mapa de series, geoseries y geopermaseries de vegetación de España. Parte I. Itinera Geobotanica 17:95–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas-Martínez S et al (2011) Mapa de series, geoseries y geopermaseries de vegetación de España. Memoria del mapa de vegetación potencial de España. Parte II. Itinera Geobotanica 18(1):5–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP, Rodríguez-Clark KM, Baillie JEM et al (2011) Establishing IUCN Red List criteria for threatened ecosystems. Conserv Biol 25(1):21–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP, Rodríguez-Clark KM, Keith DA et al (2012) IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. SAPIENS [On line] 5(2). Available: http://sapiens.revues.org. Accessed 25 Feb 2013

  • Rodwell J, Dring J, Pignatti S et al (1998) Phytosociological relationships of EUNIS Habitats. Agence Européenne de l’Environement. Centre Thématique Européen pour la conservation de la Nature

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell J, Schaminée JHJ, Mucina L et al. (2002) The diversity of European vegetation. An overview of phytosociological alliances and their relationships to EUNIS habitats, National Reference Centre for Agriculture, Nature and Fisheries, Wageningen, p 115

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell J, Janssen J, Gubbay S et al (2013) Red list Assessment of European Habitat types – a feasibility study – European Commission, DG Environment. Available: http://circbc.europa.eu. Accessed 1 Feb 2014

  • Sawyer JO, Keeler-Wolf T (1997) A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society. Available: http://davisherb.ucdavis.edu. Accessed 25 Feb 2013

  • Schaminée JHJ, Weeda EJ, Westhoff V (1995) De Vegetatie van Nederland (Deel 1 – 5). Opulus Press, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaminée JHJ, van Kley JE, Ozinga WA (2002) The analysis of long-term changes in plant communities: case studies from the Netherlands. Phytocoenologia 32(2):317–335. doi:10.1127/0340-269X/2002/0032-0317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaminée JHJ, Hennekens SM, Chytrý M et al (2009) Vegetation plots data and databases in Europe: an overview. Preslia 81:173–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaminée JHJ, Chytrý M, Hennekens S et al (2012) Development of vegetation syntaxa crosswalks to EUNIS habitat classification and related data sets. Report to the European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • SIVIM (2012) Sistema de Información de la Vegetación Ibérica y Macaronésica, Available: http://www.sivim.info/sivi. Accessed 23 Jan 2013

  • Takacs D (1996) The idea of biodiversity. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Takacs D (2001) Historical awareness of biodiversity. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, vol 3. Academic, San Diego, pp 363–369

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tombal P, Meriaux JL (1981) Contribution à une méthode propre à inventorier, évaluer et hiérarchiser les sites naturels à l’échelle régionale et nationale. In: Séminaire de Phytosociologie appliquée. Metz, Inst. Européen, pp 57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber EH, Moravec J, Theurillat J-P (2000) International code of phytosociological nomenclature. J Veg Sci 11:739–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (ed) (1988) Biodiversity. National Academies, Washington, DC, p 521

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús Izco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Izco, J. (2017). Biodiversity Conservation: Habitats and Plant Communities. In: Loidi, J. (eds) The Vegetation of the Iberian Peninsula. Plant and Vegetation, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54867-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics