Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Bright and Dark Sides of Job Autonomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Job Demands in a Changing World of Work

Abstract

In recent decades, the regulation of work has been increasingly handed over to the individual worker, who is given greater autonomy in performing his/her job. Employees can decide not only how (methods autonomy) but also when (worktime autonomy) and where they perform their work (workplace autonomy ). Although an array of theoretical and empirical accounts have praised the positive effects of job autonomy on employee well-being and motivation since the 1970s, a small body of empirical work indicates that too much job autonomy may be detrimental to employees. This chapter therefore sheds light on the bright and dark sides of job autonomy in today’s world of work. It discusses different forms of job autonomy as well as their meaning in highly regulated and more flexible forms of work and offers insights into when job autonomy has beneficial and deleterious effects. It proposes that worktime and workplace autonomy are more likely to have negative effects on employee well-being than methods autonomy and that the potential positive and negative effects of various forms of autonomy are contingent on characteristics of the individual worker as well as on constellations of job characteristics .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ala-Mursula, L., Vahtera, J., Linna, A., Pentti, J., & Kivimäki, M. (2005). Employee worktime control moderates the effects of job strain and effort-reward imbalance on sickness absence: The 10-town study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 851–857.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Allvin, M., Aronsson, G., Hagström, T., Johansson, G., & Lundberg, U. (2011). Work without boundaries. Psychological perspectives on the new working life. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). The relation of intrinsic need satisfaction to performance and wellbeing in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328. doi:10.1108/02683940710733115.

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources may buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 170–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, B. B., Bauer, C. C., Bajdo, L. M., & Parker, C. P. (2002). The use of multitrait-multimethod data for detecting nonlinear relationships: The case of psychological climate and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 496–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bunner, J. (2014). How do professional newcomers deal with increased autonomy at work? The importance of self-leadership styles (Unpublished diploma thesis). Wien: Universität Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L. (1991). Selectivity theory: Social activity in life-span context. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 11, 195–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzitheochari, S., & Arber, S. (2009). Lack of sleep, work and the long hours culture: Evidence from the UK time use survey. Work, Employment & Society, 23, 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung-Yan, G. A. (2010). The nonlinear effects of job complexity and autonomy on job satisfaction, turnover, and psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 237–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580–590. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580.

  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagne, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942. doi:10.1177/0146167201278002.

  • De Jonge, J., & Dormann, C. (2006). Stressors, resources, and strain at work: A longitudinal test of the triple-match principle. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1359–1374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jonge, J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1998). Job characteristics and employee well-being: A test of Warr’s vitamin model in health care workers using structural equation modelling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Derks, D., Lieke, L., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). New ways of working: Impact on working conditions, work–family balance, and well-being. In C. Korunka & P. Hoonakker (Eds.), The impact of ICT on quality of working life (pp. 123–141). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fishta, A., & Backé, E.-M. (2015). Psychosocial stress at work and cardiovascular diseases: An overview of systematic reviews. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 88, 997–1014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M. (1987). A theory of control and complexity: Implications for software design and integration of computer systems into the work place. In M. Frese, E. Ulich, & W. Dzida (Eds.), Psychological issues of human computer interaction in the work place (pp. 313–337). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. http://doi.org/10.1002/job.322.

  • Gagné, M., Koestner, R., & Zuckerman, M. (2000). Facilitating acceptance of organizational change: The importance of self-determination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1843–1852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, D. G. (1986). Activation and theory and task design: An empirical test of several new predictions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 411–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaziel, H. (1989). Determinants of perceived deficiency of autonomy among elementary school administrators. Social Behavior and Personality, 17, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdenitsch, C., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2015). Control in flexible work arrangements: When freedom becomes duty. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14, 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B. (2001). Me and us: Differential relationships among goal-setting training, efficacy, and effectiveness at the individual and team level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 789–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, W. (2003). Action regulation theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häusser, J. A., Mojzisch, A., Niesel, M., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being. Work & Stress, 24, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332–1356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilardi, B. C., Leone, D., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1789–1805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeurissen, T., & Nyklíček, I. (2010). Testing the vitamin model of job stress in Dutch health care workers. Work & Stress, 15, 254–264. doi:10.1080/02678370110066607.

  • Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jimmieson, N. L. (2000). Employee reactions to behavioural control under conditions of stress: The moderating role of self-efficacy. Work & Stress, 14, 262–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johlke, M. C., & Iyer, R. (2013). A model of retail job characteristics, employee role ambiguity, external customer mind-set, and sales performance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(1), 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L., Nesheim, T., & Olsen, K. M. (2009). Is participation good or bad for workers? Effects of autonomy, consultation and teamwork on stress among workers in Norway. Acta Sociologica, 52, 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., Davey, J., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Motivation and employee-supervisor discrepancies in a psychiatric vocational rehabilitation setting. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible work practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63, 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (Eds.). (1983). Work and personality. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., & Van Dynet, L. (2011). How work-life flexibility influences work performance of individuals and groups. In K. Korabik, D. S. Lero, & D. L. Whitehead (Eds.), Handbook of work-family integration: Research, theory, and best practices (pp. 305–330). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, B., Korunka, C., & Tement, S. (2014). Too much job control? Two studies on curvilinear relations between job control and eldercare workers’ well-being. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51, 1644–1653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M., & Korunka, C. (2015). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing job demands arising from accelerated change: The Intensification of Job Demands Scale (IDS). European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 898–913. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.979160.

  • Linton, S. J., Kecklund, G., Franklin, K. A., Leissner, L. C., Sivertsen, B., Lindberg, E., … Björkelund, C. (2015). The effect of the work environment on future sleep disturbances: A systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 23, 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. F., Jr., Plant, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2005). Psychological need satisfaction, motivation, attitudes, and well-being among psychiatric hospital staff and patients. Professional Psychology, 36, 415–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24, 1337–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkikangas, A., Feldt, T., & Kinnunen, U. (2007). Warr’s scale of job-related affective well-being: A longitudinal examination of its structure and relationship with work characteristics. Work & Stress, 21(3), 197–219. doi:10.1080/02678370701662151.

  • Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work-family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 689–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 71–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). The moderating effects of age in the relationships of job autonomy to work outcomes. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijp, H. H., Beckers, D. G., Geurts, S. A., Tucker, P., & Kompier, M. A. (2012). Systematic review on the association between employee worktime control and work-non-work balance, health and well-being, and job-related outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 38, 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. I., Jacob, A. C., Wagner, S. H., & Baiden, M. (2014). Job control and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63, 607–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R., & Jang, S. J. (2015). Mediating role of perceived supervisor support in the relationship between job autonomy and mental health: moderating role of value–means fit. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paškvan, M., Kubicek, B., Keller, A. & Korunka, C. (in prep). Curvilinear effects of autonomy: Time pressure as a boundary condition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paškvan, M., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2013). Can autonomy lead to emotional exhaustion? Short-term strain responses explaining negative effects of autonomy. Paper presented at the Work, Stress, & Health Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing-effect in management. Journal of Management, 39, 313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pongratz, H. J., & Voß, G. G. (2003). From employee to ‘entreployee’: Towards a ‘self-entrepreneurial’ work force? Concepts and Transformation, 8, 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, M. S. (2013). Advancing case manager motivation in child welfare: Job control’s curvilinear relationship and instrumental feedback’s moderating influence. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 2003–2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67, 413–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau, R., & Buyken, D. (2015). Der aktuelle Kenntnisstand über Erkrankungsrisiken durch psychische Arbeitsbelastungen. Ein systematisches Review über Metaanalysen und Reviews [Current status of knowledge about health risk from mental workload: Evidence Based on a systematic review of reviews]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 59, 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydstedt, L. W., Ferrie, J., & Head, J. (2006). Is there support for curvilinear relationships between psychosocial work characteristics and mental well-being? Cross-sectional and long-term data from the Whitehall II study. Work & Stress, 20(1), 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salanova, M., Peiró, J. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). Self-efficacy specificity and burnout among information technology workers: An extension of the job demand-control model. European Journal of work and organizational psychology, 11(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbaugh-Thompson, M., & Feldman, M. S. (1998). Electronic mail and organizational communication: Does saying “Hi” really matter? Organization Science, 9(6), 685–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck, J., & Merritt, D. E. (1997). Divergent effects of job control on coping with work stressors: The key role of self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 738–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomi, S. J., & Harlow, H. F. (1972). Depressive behavior in young monkeys subjected to vertical chamber confinement. Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 80(1), 11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taris, T. W. (2006). Bricks without clay: On urban myths in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 20, 99–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1998). The job demand control (-support) model and physical health outcomes: A review of the strain and buffer hypothesis. Psychology & Health, 13, 909–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1999). The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work & Stress, 13, 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Mierlo, H., Rutte, C. V., Vermunt, J. K., Kompier, M. A. J., & Doorewaard, J. A. M. C. (2006). Individual autonomy in work teams: The role of team autonomy, self-efficacy, and social support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(3), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Yperen, N. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & De Jonge, K. M. M. (2014). Blended working: For whom it may (not) work. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e102921.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Van Yperen, N. W., Wortier, B., & De Jonge, K. M. M. (2016, in press). Workers’ intrinsic work motivation when job demands are high: The role of need for autonomy and perceived opportunity for blended working. Computers in Human Behavior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. B. (1990). Decision latitude, job demands and employee well-being. Work & Stress, 4, 285–294. doi:10.1080/02678379008256991.

  • Warr, P. B. (1994). A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health. Work & Stress, 8, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. B. (2013). Jobs and job-holders: Two sources of happiness and unhappiness. In K. Cameron & A. Caza (Eds.), Happiness and Organizations (pp. 733–750). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, R., Klemens, S., Scherrer, K., Timm, E., & Krajewski, J. (2004). Moderne IT-Arbeitswelt gestalten. Anforderungen, Belastungen und Ressourcen in der IT-Branche. [Structuring the modern IT world of work. Demands, strains and resources in the IT branch.] Techniker Krankenkasse: Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wielenga-Meijer, E. G. A., Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A. J., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2010). From task characteristics to learning: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 363–375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. A. (2011). The changing nature of jobs: a meta-analysis examining changes in job characteristics over time. Master thesis, University of Georgia, Georgia, USA. Retrieved from http://dbs.galib.uga.edu/cgi-bin/getd.cgi?userid=galileo&serverno=8&instcode=publ&_cc=1.

  • Wortman, C. B., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1979). Interpersonal relationships and cancer: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 35(1), 120–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010, Vienna, Austria

    Bettina Kubicek, Matea Paškvan & Johanna Bunner

Authors
  1. Bettina Kubicek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matea Paškvan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johanna Bunner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bettina Kubicek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Christian Korunka

  2. Department of Applied Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Bettina Kubicek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M., Bunner, J. (2017). The Bright and Dark Sides of Job Autonomy. In: Korunka, C., Kubicek, B. (eds) Job Demands in a Changing World of Work. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54678-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation