Skip to main content

Animal Rights and the Distorting Power of Anthropocentric Prejudice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical and Political Approaches to Nonhuman Animal Issues
  • 623 Accesses

Abstract

In his chapter, Gary Steiner notes how traditional arguments about the moral status of nonhuman animals have exhibited a strongly anthropocentric tendency that is evident in philosophical discussions of personhood, rights, and the question of specific duties toward nonhuman animals. Steiner thus aims to highlight anthropocentric prejudice in the arguments of thinkers such as the Stoics, Bentham, Kant, Peter Singer, and John Rawls, and to show how an adequate acknowledgment of the moral status of nonhuman animals requires an affirmation of nonanimal personhood and rights, as well as a specification of clear duties on the part of human beings toward nonhuman animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kant hints strongly at this conclusion in Kant, 2001, p.180.

  2. 2.

    Alasdair Cochrane offers such a view in Animal Rights without Liberation: Applied Ethics and Human Obligations, New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.

Bibliography

  • Aristotle, 1995. The Complete Works of Aristotle. J Barnes, ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, H., 1985. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Trans., R. Wallace. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillé, A., et. al., 2011. De la Convivialité: Dialogues sur la Société Conviviale à Venir. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, A., 2012. Animal Rights without Liberation: Applied Ethics and Human Obligations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. M., 2015. A Bittersweet Bow for the Elephant. New York Times, (March 8th, 2015), Week in Review, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. 1984. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 1. Trans., J. Cottingham, et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F., et. al., 2006. Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diogenes Laertius, 2000. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Vol. 2. Trans., R. D. Hicks. Cambridge: Loeb/Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R., 2004. Animals as Objects, or Subjects, of Rights. In C. R. Sunstein & M. C. Nussbaum, eds., Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francione, G. L., 2000. Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog?. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francione, G. L., 2008. Animals as Persons: Essays on the Abolition of Animal Exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I., 1973. La Convivialité. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., 2009. Anthropology, History, and Education. Trans., G. Zöller & R. B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., 2008. Critique of the Power of Judgment. P. Guyer, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., 1981. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans., J. W. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., 1997. Lectures on Ethics. P. Heath & J. B. Schneewind, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans., M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., 2001. Political Writings. H. S. Reiss, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N., eds. and trans., 1990. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F., 1972. Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None. Trans., W. Kaufmann. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A., 2004. Animal Rights: Legal, Philosophical, and Pragmatic Perspectives. In C. R. Sunstein & M. C. Nussbaum, eds., Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., 2005. Political Liberalism. Expanded Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Belknap/Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J-J., 2013. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. V. Gourevitch, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C., 2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Trans., G. Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, A., 2000. Parerga and Paralipomena, Vol. 2. Trans., E. F. J. Payne. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G., 2013. Animals and the Limits of Postmodernism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G., 2008. Animals and the Moral Community: Mental Life, Moral Status, and Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G., 2005. Anthropocentrism and its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, D. J. & Sullivan, M., 2004. Foxes in the Henhouse: Animals, Agribusiness, and the Law: A Modern American Fable. In C. R. Sunstein & M. C. Nussbaum, eds., Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Steiner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steiner, G. (2017). Animal Rights and the Distorting Power of Anthropocentric Prejudice. In: Woodhall, A., Garmendia da Trindade, G. (eds) Ethical and Political Approaches to Nonhuman Animal Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54549-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics