Skip to main content

Is a Data-Driven Approach Still Better Than Random Choice with Naive Bayes Classifiers?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10191))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study the performance of data-driven, a priori and random approaches to label space partitioning for multi-label classification with a Gaussian Naive Bayes classifier. Experiments were performed on 12 benchmark data sets and evaluated on 5 established measures of classification quality: micro and macro averaged F1 score, subset accuracy and Hamming loss. Data-driven methods are significantly better than an average run of the random baseline. In case of F1 scores and Subset Accuracy - data driven approaches were more likely to perform better than random approaches than otherwise in the worst case. There always exists a method that performs better than a priori methods in the worst case. The advantage of data-driven methods against a priori methods with a weak classifier is lesser than when tree classifiers are used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boutell, M.R., Luo, J., Shen, X., Brown, C.M.: Learning multi-label scene classification. Pattern Recogn. 37(9), 1757–1771 (2004). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031320304001074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Briggs, F., Lakshminarayanan, B., Neal, L., Fern, X.Z., Raich, R., Hadley, S.J.K., Hadley, A.S., Betts, M.G.: Acoustic classification of multiple simultaneous bird species: a multi-instance multi-label approach. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131(6), 4640–4650 (2012). http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/131/6/10.1121/1.4707424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Diplaris, S., Tsoumakas, G., Mitkas, P.A., Vlahavas, I.: Protein classification with multiple algorithms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel., 448–456 (2005). http://www.springerlink.com/index/P662542G78792762.pdf

  4. Duygulu, P., Barnard, K., Freitas, J.F.G., Forsyth, D.A.: Object recognition as machine translation: learning a lexicon for a fixed image vocabulary. In: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (eds.) ECCV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2353, pp. 97–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi:10.1007/3-540-47979-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Elisseeff, A., Weston, J.: A kernel method for multi-labelled classification. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 14, pp. 681–687. MIT Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katakis, I., Tsoumakas, G., Vlahavas, I.: Multilabel text classification for automated tag suggestion. In: Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD-08 Workshop on Discovery Challenge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klimt, B., Yang, Y.: The Enron corpus: a new dataset for email classification research. In: Boulicaut, J.-F., Esposito, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D. (eds.) ECML 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3201, pp. 217–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30115-8_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Read, J., Pfahringer, B., Holmes, G., Frank, E.: Classifier chains for multi-label classification. Mach. Learn. 85(3), 333–359 (2011). http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10994-011-5256-5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Snoek, C.G.M., Worring, M., Gemert, J.C.V., Geusebroek, J.M., Smeulders, A.W.M.: The challenge problem for automated detection of 101 semantic concepts in multimedia. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 421–430. ACM Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Szymanski, P., Kajdanowicz, T., Kersting, K.: How is a data-driven approach better than random choice in label space division for multi-label classification? Entropy 18(8), 282 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e18080282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Trohidis, K., Tsoumakas, G., Kalliris, G., Vlahavas, I.P.: Multi-label classification of music into emotions. ISMIR 8, 325–330 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tsoumakas, G., Vlahavas, I.: Random k-Labelsets: an ensemble method for multilabel classification. In: Kok, J.N., Koronacki, J., Mantaras, R.L., Matwin, S., Mladenič, D., Skowron, A. (eds.) ECML 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4701, pp. 406–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74958-5_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsoumakas, G., Katakis, I., Vlahavas, I.: Effective and efficient multilabel classification in domains with large number of labels. In: Proceedings of ECML/PKDD 2008 Workshop on Mining Multidimensional Data (MMD 2008), pp. 30–44 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piotr Szymański .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Szymański, P., Kajdanowicz, T. (2017). Is a Data-Driven Approach Still Better Than Random Choice with Naive Bayes Classifiers?. In: Nguyen, N., Tojo, S., Nguyen, L., Trawiński, B. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10191. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54472-4_74

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54472-4_74

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54471-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54472-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics