Abstract
Augmentation mastoplasty is a useful procedure for improving body contouring, but when the operation is not well planned, several patients seek to have the implant removed. The operation must be well-evaluated and requires a good understanding between patient and surgeon, as it is a repair of a previous aesthetic procedure. Patient complaints about the unaesthetic appearance due to ptosis of the breasts are caused by the excessive weight of the implant. The main reason for removing the implant is because of the imbalance between its size and the internal volume of the breasts. When the container is too wide or the implant is not big enough to achieve a good balance, the patient feels uncomfortable with two balls on her chest. The operation is to remove the implant followed by mastopexy to remodel the new beasts. I created a dermal–adipose–glandular flap with a superior pedicle to be rotated upward and backward that is sutured onto the posterior aspect of the Pitanguy’s “third pedicle.” The second operation must evaluate the remaining mammary gland with accurate clinical examination and by using mammography or magnetic resonance imaging.
References
Avelar JM (1980) Retalho dermo-adiposo-glandular superior nas ptoses mamárias. In: Simpósio Brasileiro de Cirurgia da Mama, São Paulo
Avelar JM (1986) Psychological profile of the patient—introducing to the subject (Perfil psicológico do paciente—introdução ao estudo). In: Avelar JM, Illouz YG (eds) Lipoaspiração (liposuction), vol 2. Hipócrates, São Paulo, pp 8–18
Avelar JM (1988) Abdominoplasty—reflections and bio-psychological perspectives (abdominoplastia reflexões e perspectiva biopsicológicas). Rev Soc Bras Cir Plast 3(2):152–154
Avelar JM (1993) Augmentation mastoplasty—mastopexy versus silicone inclusion (mastoplastia de aumento—mastopexia X Inclusão de silicone). In: Avelar JM (ed) Loco-regional anesthesia on aesthetic surgery (anestesia loco-regional em cirurgia estética), vol 33. Hipócrates, São Paulo, pp 284–300
Broadbent TR, Woolf RM (1978) Unsatisfactory results in augmentation mammaplasty—chest and breast asymmetry. Aesthet Plast Surg 2(3):251–269
Cronin TD, Gerow FJ (1963) Augmentation mammaplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: 3rd International Congress Plastic Surgery, vol 20. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 41–49
Maliniac J (1959) Harmful fallacies in mammaplasty. Abstract, International Congress of Plastic Surgery, London
May H (1943) Reconstruction of breast deformities. Surg Gynecol Obstet 77:523
Noel A (1933) Refection plastique du mamelon apres necrose survenue a la suite d’une operation esthétique des seins. Le Bull Méd
Pitanguy I (1959) Breast hypertrophy. In: Wallace AB (ed) Transaction International Society of Plastic Surgeons, Second Congress. E&S Livingstone, Edinburgh and London, pp 509–517
Pitanguy I, Garcia LC (1972) Important aspects of the personal technique of mammaplasty (aspectos importantes da tecnica pessoal em mammaplastia). Bol Soc Cir Plast Reconstr 4:7
Schwarzmann E (1930) Die Technik der Mammaplastik. Chirurg 2:932–943
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Avelar, J.M. (2018). Removal of Breast Implants Followed by Mastopexy. In: Avelar, J. (eds) Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_60
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54114-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54115-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)