Skip to main content

Mastopexy with Implant Inclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Breast Surgery

Abstract

Breast ptosis or sagging is a natural consequence of aging. The key factors influencing breast ptosis are, pregnancy, gravity, high BMI, breast size, and significant weight gain and/or loss. We use Regnault’s classification (mild, moderate, severe, and pseudoptosis), which is the most known and used. Mastopexy with implant is considered one of the most complex surgeries because of the difficulty in achieving the right balance between two antagonist vectors: reduction and augmentation. The treatment becomes more complex as the degree of ptosis increases. When the ptosis is mild it can be treated with a periareolar approach with implant inclusion or in more severe cases a periareolar approach with a vertical or inverted T. There are several factors that affect the outcome of the surgery. Every aspect of the patient should be evaluated, especially the patient’s expectations.

Head of Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Universidade Federal do Estado of the Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F et al (2007) A retrospective analysis of 3,000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: postoperative complications and associated factors. Aesth Plast Surg 31(5):532–539. Epub 2007 July 20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baran CN, Peker F, Ortak T et al (2001) Unsatisfactory results of periareolar mastopexy with or without augmentation and reduction mammaplasty: enlarged areola with flattened nipple. Aesth Plast Surg 25(4):286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the round block technique. Aesth Plast Surg 14:93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bostwick J (1983) Correctin of the breast ptosis. In: Aesthetic and recent breast surgery. CV Mosby, St Louis, pp 209–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Cárdenas-Camarena L, Ramírez-Macías R (2006) Augmentation/mastopexy: how to select and perform the proper technique. Aesth Plast Surg 30(1):21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chekkoury IH, Rodier C, Keller P et al (1991) Our own experience in the treatment of hypotrophy and ptosis of the breast. Ann Chir Plast Esthetic 36(2):116–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Daher C, Di Lamartini J (2012) Mastopexy associated with submuscular or subglandular silicone implants: indications and complications. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 27(2):294–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Benito J, Sánchez K (2010) Key points in mastopexy. Aesthet Plast Surg 34(6):711–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufourmentel C, Mouly R (1959) Chirurgie plastique. Flammarion, Paris, pp 327–370

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente A, Martin del Yerro JL (1992) Periareolar mastopexy with mammary implants. Aesth Plast Surg 16(4):337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales-Ulloa M (1960) Correction of hypotrophy of the breast by means of exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg 25(1):15–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber R, Denkler K, Hvistendahl Y (2006) Extended crescent mastopexy with augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 30(3):269–274. discussion 275-76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handel N (2006) Secondary mastopexy in the augmented patient: a recipe for disaster. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7 Suppl):152S–163S. discussion 164S-65S, 166S-67S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover DJ, Paragi PR, Santoro E, Schafer S, Chamberlain RS (2010) Pro- phylactic mastectomy in high risk patients: a practice-based review of the indications. Do we follow guidelines? Breast Dis 31(1):19–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan UD Lower pole enhancement in breast augmentation. In: 6th Croatian Congress of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. Croatia: Opatja-Rijeka, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan UD (2007) Muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation. A new pocket in a different plane. Aesth Plast Surg 31:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan L (1999) Augmentation of the ptotic breast: simultaneous periareolar mastopexy and breast augmentation. Aesth Surg 19:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalardrie J, Jouglard JP (1974) La chirurgie plastique du sein. Masson, Paris, p 290

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejour M (1999) Vertical mammaplasty: early complications after 250 personal consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(3):764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owaley J Jr (1979) Simultaneous mastopexy and augmentation for correction of the small, ptotic breast. Ann Plastic Surg 2(3):195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsa FD, Parsa AA (2006) Breast ptosis: to augment, to lift, or to do both? Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2101–2102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pesquisa Datafolha encomendada pela Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica. (n.d.) Disponível em http://www2.cirurgiaplastica.org.br. Accessed 22 August 2011

  • Pitanguy I (1961) Mammaplasty: study of 245 consecutive cases and presentation of a personal technique. Rev Bras Cir 42:201–220

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puckett CL (1985) Crescent mastopexy and augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 75(4):533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regnault P (1990) Breast reduction and mastopexy, an old love story: B technique update. Aesth Plast Surg 14(2):101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrich RJ, Gosman AA, Brown SA et al (2006) Mastopexy preferences: a survey of board-certified plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7):1631–1638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saldanha OR, Maloof RG, Dutra RT, Luz OAL, Saldanha Filho O, Saldanha CB (2010) Mamaplastia redutora com implante de silicone. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 25(2):317–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh KH, Letter A (2009) Incision periareolar mastopexy with breast implant augmentation. N Iraqi J Med 5(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear SL (2006) Augmentation/mastopexy: “surgeon, beware”. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7 Suppl):133S–135S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spear SL, Low M, Ducic I (2003) Revision augmentation mastopexy: indications, operations and outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 51:540–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesth Plast Surg. 28(5):259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens WG, Freeman ME, Stoker DA et al (2007) One-stage mastopexy with breast augmentation: a review of 321 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(6):1674–1679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tebbetts JB (2001a) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft tissue relationship in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tebbetts JB (2001b) Alternatives and trade-offs in breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 28(3):485–500

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Cavalcanti Ribeiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ribeiro, R.C., Bermudez, A., Pastor, M. (2018). Mastopexy with Implant Inclusion. In: Avelar, J. (eds) Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54114-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54115-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics