Skip to main content

The Performance Analysis of Low-Resolution Paintings for Computational Aesthetics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Graphics (SG 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9317))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the study of computational aesthetics, we always use high-resolution paintings to analyze painting style, but actually the paintings we obtain mostly are low-resolution. In this paper, the contrast experiments based on sparse coding are carried out between high and low resolution paintings. Different features are extracted in frequency domain and Gabor domain from the basis function of sparse coding (SC). Then the normalized mutual information (NMI) is figured out to analyze the effect of different features for painting style. At last, the features with better performance are used to classify the paintings’ style. The results of experiments show that, to a certain extent, the features extracted from low-resolution paintings still have the ability to characterize the painting style, among which the Gabor energy has the best effect in the painting style analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Birkhoff, G.D.: Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1933)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoenig, F.: Defining computational aesthetics. In: Proceedings of the First Eurographics Conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging, pp. 13–18. Eurographics Association (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Galanter, P.: Computational aesthetic evaluation: past and future. In: McCormack, J., d’Inverno, M. (eds.) Computers and Creativity, pp. 255–293. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Rigau, J., Feixas, M., Sbert, M.: Image information in digital photography. In: Koch, R., Huang, F. (eds.) ACCV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6469, pp. 122–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22819-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Rigau, J., Feixas, M., Sbert, M., et al.: Toward Auvers period: evolution of Van Gogh’s style. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging, pp. 99–106. Eurographics Association (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feixas, M., Bardera, A., Rigau, J., et al.: Information theory tools for image processing. Synth. Lect. Comput. Graph. Animat. 6(1), 1–164 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham, D.J., Friedenberg, J.D., Rockmore, D.N., et al.: Mapping the similarity space of paintings: image statistics and visual perception. Vis. Cogn. 18(4), 559–573 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor, R.P., Micolich, A.P., Jonas, D.: Fractal analysis of Pollock’s drip paintings. Nature 399(6735), 422 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Claro, A., Melo, M.J., de Melo, J.S.S., et al.: Identification of red colorants in Van Gogh paintings and ancient Andean textiles by microspectrofluorimetry. J. Cult. Herit. 11(1), 27–34 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Donoho, D.L., Flesia, A.G.: Can recent innovations in harmonic analysis ‘explain’ key findings in natural image statistics? Netw.: Comput. Neural Syst. 12(3), 371–393 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Berezhnoy, I., Postma, E., Herik, D.: Digital analysis of Van Gogh’s complementary colours. In: Proceedings of 16th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (BNAIC 2004), pp. 163–170 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jafarpour, S., et al.: Stylistic analysis of paintings using wavelets and machine learning. In: European Signal Processing Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rigau, J., Feixas, M., Sbert, M.: Informational aesthetics measures. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 28(2), 24–34 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes, J.M., Graham, D.J., Rockmore, D.N.: Quantification of artistic style through sparse coding analysis in the drawings of Pieter Bruegel the Elder. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107(4), 1279–1283 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes, J.M., Graham, D.J., Jacobsen, C.R., et al.: Comparing higher-order spatial statistics and perceptual judgments in the stylometric analysis of art. In: EUSIPCO-2011, pp. 1244–1248 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, Y., Pu, Y., Xu, D.: Computer analysis for visual art style. In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2013 Technical Briefs, p. 9. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Y., Pu, Y., Xu, D., Ren, Y.: Digital analysis for Van Gogh’s paintings. J. Syst. Simul. 27(4), 779–785 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

It is a project supported by Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China (No. 61271361, 61263048, 61163019, 61462093), the Research Foundation of Yunnan Province (2014FA021, 2014FB113), and Digital Media Technology Key Laboratory of Universities in Yunnan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan yuan Pu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhu, J., Pu, Y.y., Xu, D., Qian, W.h., Wang, L.q. (2017). The Performance Analysis of Low-Resolution Paintings for Computational Aesthetics. In: Chen, Y., Christie, M., Tan, W. (eds) Smart Graphics. SG 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9317. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53838-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53838-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53837-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53838-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics