Abstract
The Estonian ban on incitement to hatred is not effective and thus violates the Framework Decision of the Council of the European Union on combating certain forms and expressions of racism, general and country specific recommendations of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance and other international treaties. The conflict stems from the inactivity of the Estonian legislators in regard to hate speech. The violation of the Framework Decision cannot be overcome by interpreting laws. However, the contradiction has been somewhat amplified by the case law of the Estonian Supreme Court. Pursuant to the principle of supremacy of European Union law, the Supreme Court should consider reviewing its interpretation of the ban on hate speech and the danger caused by racist expressions. While even a radical revision would not solve the conflict with European Union law to full extent, a different interpretation could somewhat alleviate the discrepancy. The Ministry of Justice of Estonia has proposed a draft act to amend the ban on incitement to hatred. Even though the proposed wording follows international treaties more closely, its coherence still depends on the interpretation given to it by courts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance. ECRI report on Estonia (fifth monitoring cycle). Adopted on 16.06.2015. Available at http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/Country-by-country/Estonia/EST-CbC-V-2015-036-ENG.pdf
TNS EMOR. Poll on the attitude of Estonian residents towards refugees. 17.12.2015
Balti Uuringute Insituut. Uussissrändajate kohanemine Eestis: valikud ja poliitikaettepanekud tervikliku ja jätkusuutliku süsteemi kujundamiseks. Tartu 2014. Available at https://www.riigikantselei.ee/valitsus/valitsus/et/riigikantselei/strateegia/poliitika-analuusid-ja-uuringud/tarkade-otsuste-fondi-uuringute-kokkuvotted/TOF%20-%20uussisser%C3%A4ndajad%20-%20l%C3%B5puaruanne.pdf (in Estonian)
Penal Code—RT I 2001, 61, 364. Available in English (unofficial translation) at https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/523122015005/consolide
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance. Second report on Estonia. Adopted on 22.06.2001. Available at http://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/XMLEcri/ENGLISH/Cycle_02/02_CbC_eng/02-cbc-estonia-eng.pdf
Criminal Code—RT I 1999, 38, 485. Available in Estonian at https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/77448
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance. Third report on Estonia. Adopted on 24.06.2005. Available at http://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/XMLEcri/ENGLISH/Cycle_03/03_CbC_eng/EST-CbC-III-2006-1-ENG.pdf
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance. ECRI report on Estonia (fourth monitoring cycle). Adopted on 15.12.2010. Available at http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/Country-by-country/Estonia/EST-CbC-IV-2010-003-ENG.pdf
Ministry of Justice. Explanatory memorandum of Draft Act to amend Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure and Code of Misdemeanour Procedure. 07.10.2014
Court Ruling of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court 10.04.2006, 3-1-1-117-05. Available only in Estonian at http://www.nc.ee/?id=11&tekst=222487132
Sootak J, Pikamäe P (2009). Karistusseadustik. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. 3., täiendatud ja ümbertöötatud väljaanne. Tallinn. Page 432
Court Ruling of the Harju Circuit Court 02.10.2007, 4-07-5346. Available only in Estonian at http://legal.ee/judgement/9687286
Council of Europe (2003). Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalization of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance. ECRI General Policy Recommendation No. 7 on National Legislation to Combat Racism and Racial Discrimination. Adopted on 13.12.2002. Available at https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/activities/gpr/en/recommendation_n7/ecri03-8%20recommendation%20nr%207.pdf
Garaudy vs France, 65831/01, 24.06.2003, p. 23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ehrlich, S.A. (2017). Could the Estonian Ban on Hate Speech Interpreted in a More Efficient Way?. In: ElĂłsegui, M., Hermida, C. (eds) Racial Justice, Policies and Courts' Legal Reasoning in Europe. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 60. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53580-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53580-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53579-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53580-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)