Abstract
Since 2013 some different hydraulic tests were conducted and replicated in a large earth-slide characterized by a landslide body rich in clay and with a mean thickness of 30 m, located in the Northern Apennines. All the tests were finalized to estimate the hydrogeological properties of the landslide and successively to design future mitigation measures. To define geometry of the sliding mass more than 15 boreholes’ stratigraphy were analyzed. Successively, the boreholes were equipped with inclinometers and open-standpipe piezometers. According to the stratigraphy, the landslide body is characterized by the presence of gravel layers in a clay-rich matrix. The research compares the results of the different used techniques, which are realized in 2 boreholes, 5 open-standpipe piezometers and using 1 couple well-piezometer. The used techniques and the number of the tests are: 31 slug tests (ST), 4 falling head tests (FT), 5 low-flow pumping tests (PT), 1 point dilution test (PD), 2 aquifer tests (AT). Moreover the tests are elaborated with different solutions: the STs with the Hvorslev and KGS solutions; the FHs with the AGI and Hvorslev solutions; the LPs with the Muskat solutions; the ATs with the Theis, Cooper-Jacob, Neuman, Moench and Tartakosky-Neuman solutions; the PD with the classical solution where Darcy velocity is calculated as a function of the rate of dilution. The results show a variability of hydraulic conductivity (K), Storativity (S) and Specific storage (Ss) in the horizontal and vertical directions (K between 1.0E-5 and 1.0E-8 m/s; S between 4.0E-3 and 5E-5; Ss between 1.0E-3 and 3.0E-3 1/m). The horizontal and vertical variation are correlated with the lithologic heterogeneity highlighted by the borehole stratigraphy. Moreover, all the hydraulic tests conducted on the landslide body given results of high performance and redundancy. The comparison between results derived from different methods are comparable each other and only in some cases it shows differences of one order of magnitude.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AGI (1977) Raccomandazioni sulla programmazione ed esecuzione delle indagini geotecniche. Associazione Geotecnica Italiana, Roma
Chiasson P (2005) Methods of interpretation of borehole falling-head tests performed in compacted clay liners. Can Geotech J 42:79–90. doi:10.1139/T04-068
Cooper HH, Jacob CE (1946) A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history. Trans Am Geophys Union 27:526–534
Deiana M, Cervi F, Corsini A, Ambanelli A, Diena M, Lopardo L, Truffelli G, Ronchetti F (2015) Hydrogeology, hydrochemistry and isotopic investigation to define the lateral hydraulic boundaries of a deep rock slide (Berceto Landslide: Northern Apennines). Eng Geol Soc Territory 2:2129–2132
Hvorslev MJ (1951) Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Bull. No. 36, Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, p 50
Hyder Z, Butler JJ Jr, McElwee CD, Liu W (1994) Slug tests in partially penetrating wells. Water Resour Res 30(11):2945–2957
Moench AF (1997) Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water-table aquifer. Water Resour Res 33(6):1397–1407
Muskat M (1937) The flow of homogeneous fluids through porous media. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York
Neuman SP (1974) Effect of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resour Res 10(2):303–312
Piccinini L, Berti M, Simoni A, Bernardi AR, Ghirotti M, Gargini A (2014) Slope stability and groundwater flow system in the area of Lizzano in Belvedere (Northern Apennines, Italy). Eng Geol 183:276–289. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.09.002
Piccnini L, Fabbri P, Pola M (2016) Point dilution tests to calculate groundwater velocity: an example in a porous aquifer in northeast Italy. Hydrol Sci J 61(8):1512–1523. doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1036756
Puls RW, Barcelona MJ (1996) Ground water issue: low-flow (minimal drawdown) ground-water sampling procedures. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/540/ S-95/504. Superfund Technology Support Center for Groundwater, RSKERL, Ada, Oklahoma
Righini M, Caputo G, Cervi F, Corsini A, Ronchetti F (2013) Forward simulation of groundwater level changes induced by deep drainage wells in Succiso earth slide (northern Apennines, Italy). Rendiconti on-line della Società Geologica Italiana 24:269–272
Robbins GA, Aragon-Jose AT, Romero A (2009) Determining hydraulic conductivity using pumping data from low-flow sampling. Ground Water 42(2):271–276
Ronchetti F, Borgatti L, Cervi F, Gorgoni C, Piccinini L, Vincenzi V, Corsini A (2009) Groundwater processes in a complex landslide, northern Apennines, Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(3):895–904. doi:10.5194/nhess-9-895-2009
Tartakovsky GD, Neuman SP (2007) Three-dimensional saturated-unsaturated flow with axial symmetry to a partially penetrating well in a compressible unconfined aquifer. Water Resour Res W01410. doi:10.1029/2006WR005153
Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Trans Am Geophys Union 16:519–524
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ronchetti, F., Piccinini, L., Deiana, M., Fabbri, P., Corsini, A. (2017). Groundwater Flow Characterization Using Different Hydraulic Methods in Large and Deep Earth-Slide Rich in Clay. In: Mikos, M., Tiwari, B., Yin, Y., Sassa, K. (eds) Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides. WLF 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53498-5_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53498-5_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53497-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53498-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)