Abstract
The concept of person is the most frequently used philosophical concept in the bioethical and biojuridical debate. The appeal to the dignity of the person and to the rights of the person, which anyone would feel to subscribe to immediately, hides many philosophical ambiguities. The concept of “person” is going through a speculative crisis. What is a person? Who is a person? How should we treat a person? These are recurring questions in bioethics and biolaw, that often lead to different and even contradictory answers.
Two major opposing trends can be discerned in bioethics. The first trend is represented by the so-called “personism”, which argues for a separation of the concept of person from that of human being (thus reducing the range of applications of the concept of person with respect to human beings, and at times extending it to non-humans). Then there is a second trend known as “personalism”, which upholds an intrinsic identity between person and human being.
In the context of “personism”, human beings are not persons from the moment of fertilization, but “become” persons at a later stage of development. As a consequence, there are human beings who are not “yet” persons. In addition, the same theories claim that personhood may end “before” the natural biological death of a human being, setting different boundaries.
Personalism, grounded in substantialist thinking, argues that human beings “are” persons by virtue of their rational nature, not that they “become” persons as a result of the effective exercise of certain functions. The personal being belongs to the ontological order: the possession of a substantial personal status cannot be acquired or diminished gradually, but it is a radical condition. The absence of properties or functions does not deny the existence of the ontological referent, which remains such by nature, since ontologically speaking it pre-exists his/her own qualities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
However, it should be recalled that respect and protection are unanimously attributed to a person in qualitative terms, but not also in quantitative ones: there are different degrees of respect and protection recognized.
- 2.
Within the context of this consideration, an exception is the concept of person as relation, which concerns a special orientation of philosophical personalism, or dialogical and relational personalism, as opposed to ontological personalism.
- 3.
Obviously this is a matter of a certain level of theoretical discourse. When the dignity of man and human rights are discussed, along with the dignity and rights of the human person, reference is made to the philosophical theories which have devised a theoretical foundation. It is clear that the real situation is very different: one can respect and safeguard a human being without knowing any theory at all, or, on the contrary, one may violate and exploit human life, even though one knows and may also articulate very precise and well-founded theories.
References
Carrithers, Michael, Steven Collins, and Steven Lukes (eds.). 1985. The Category of the Person. Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram. 1996. The Foundations of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fletcher, Joseph. 1974. Four indicators of humanhood: the enquiry matures. Hastings Center Report 4 (6): 1–4.
Goldenring, John M. 1985. The brain-life theory: towards a consistent biological definition of humanness. Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (4): 198–204.
Goodman, Michael F. (ed.). 1988. What is a Person?. Clifton (N.J.): Humana Press.
Jones, D. Gareth. 1989. Brain birth and personal identity. Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (4): 173–178.
Macklin, Ruth. 1983. Personhood in the Bioethics Literature. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly Health and Society 61 (1): 35–57.
Mahowald, Mary B. 1995. Person. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 4, ed. W.T. Reich, 1934–1940. New York: MacMillan.
Tooley, Michael. 1983. Abortion and infanticide. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Palazzani, L. (2017). Person and Human Being in Bioethics and Biolaw. In: Kurki, V., Pietrzykowski, T. (eds) Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 119. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53462-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53462-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53461-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53462-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)