Abstract
This paper suggests that “the relevance of business ethics” has often been a question of utility , which considers profits, cultural concerns, and social capital regarding organizational health. There are, however, underlying suspicions regarding the relevance of business ethics. In corporate contexts, “ethics” is often conflated with compliance, and becomes the domain of compliance and risk management. This statement is not to disparage compliance officers or their departments. Rather, the point is that there are limit s of assigning “ethics” and the valuation of actions as “ethical” to a place or office within corporate contexts. Such approaches will necessarily be reactive to and driven by law, code, and policy.
Another suspicion concerns the relevance of one’s personal ethics within an “ethical field .” An ethical field is where diverse ethical agents, with differing ethical contexts and convictions, inhabit space. The effect and influence of one’s ethical actions or convictions depends on where one lives within a given ethical field. This field approach to ethics stresses that an agent’s ethical actions and convictions are enmeshed within social relations. And, of course, power relations within any given field are always asymmetrical. The paper emphasizes that religious ideas can help shape and inform the ethics of peoples and business cultures. Attentiveness to these dynamis is an impactful way to engage business school students and business people to think afresh about ethics as both character and culture. Thinking about ethics through the lenses of the “Right”, the “Good”, and the “Fitting” can help guide people through ethical grey zones, informing them toward richer and wiser ethical decisions.
References
Business Week. 2012. http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-12-17/mba-rankings-top-schools-for-ethics. Accessed 30 May 2016.
Clark, H. 2006, October 23. Chief Ethics Officers: Who Needs Them? Fortune. http://www.forbes.com/2006/10/23/leadership-ethics-hp-lead-govern-cx_hc_1023ethics.html. Accessed 2 June 2016.
Datar, S.M., D.A. Garvin, and P.G. Cullen. 2010. Rethinking the MBA: Business Education at a Crossroads. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Giacalone, R.A., and D.T. Wargo. 2010. The Roots of the Global Finance Crisis Are in Our Business Schools. Journal of Business Education 6: 1–24.
Holland, K. 2009. Is It Time to Retrain B-Schools? http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/business/15school.html. Accessed 7 June 2016.
Hopper, K., and W. Hopper. 2007. The Puritan Gift: Reclaiming the American Dream Amidst Global Financial Chaos. New York: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd..
Khurana, R. 2010. From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lorsch, J., R. Khurana, and A.W. Lo. 2016. http://www.businessweek.com/debateroom/archives/2008/11/us_financial_cr.html. Accessed 30 May 2016.
Moldoveanu, M.C., and R.L. Martin. 2008. The Future of the MBA: Designing the Thinker of the Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Palin, A. 2013. Financial Crisis Forced Business Schools to Change Curriculum. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/80cba3fc-d9c3-11e2-98fa-00144feab7de.html#axzz39eqWKCt4. Accessed 30 May 2016.
Piper, T.R., M.C. Gentile, and S. Daloz Parks. 1993. Can Ethics Be Taught? Perspectives, Challenges, and Approaches at the Harvard Business School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
US News and World Report. 2014. http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-business-schools/mba-rankings. Accessed 30 May 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miller, D.W., Thate, M.J. (2017). Are Business Ethics Relevant?. In: Rona, P., Zsolnai, L. (eds) Economics as a Moral Science. Virtues and Economics, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53291-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53291-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53290-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53291-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)