Abstract
Various technologies in developing biomechatronic systems for medical rehabilitation have been discussed in previous chapters. These included bio-signals processing, biomechanics modelling, neural and muscular interfaces, robot-assisted training, clinical implementation, and rehabilitation robot control. This chapter summarises the main outcomes and conclusions of this book, as well as highlight the contributions made by the authors. This chapter also provides a discussion of future directions that can be explored to extend or advance the work presented in this book.
References
Pau J.W.L., S.Q. Xie, and A.J. Pullan, Neuromuscular interfacing: Establishing an EMG-driven model for the human elbow joint. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2012. 59(9): p. 2586–2593.
Buchanan T.S., et al., Neuromusculoskeletal modeling: Estimation of muscle forces and joint moments and movements from measurements of neural command. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 2004. 20(4): p. 367–395.
Eilenberg M.F., H. Geyer, and H. Herr, Control of a powered ankle–foot prosthetic based on a neuromuscular model. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2010. 18(2): p. 164–173.
Cavallaro E., et al., Hill-based model as a myoprocessor for a neural controlled powered exoskeleton arm-parameters optimization. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005. p. 4514–4519.
Buchanan T.S., S.L. Delp, and J. Solbeck, Muscular resistance to varus and valgus loads at the elbow. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1998. 120(5): p. 634–639.
Chang Y.-W., et al., Optimum length of muscle contraction. Clinical Biomechanics, 1999. 14(8): p. 537–542.
Koo T.K., A.F. Mak, and L. Hung, In vivo determination of subject-specific musculotendon parameters: Applications to the prime elbow flexors in normal and hemiparetic subjects. Clinical Biomechanics, 2002. 17(5): p. 390–399.
Knaepen, K., et al., Human-robot interaction: Kinematics and muscle activity inside a powered compliant knee exoskeleton. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2014.
Koenig, A., et al., Psychological state estimation from physiological recordings during robot-assisted gait rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 2011. 48(4): p. 367–385.
Glitsch, U. and W. Baumann, The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity. Journal of Biomechanics, 1997. 30(11–12): p. 1123–1131.
Seireg, A. and R.J. Arvikar, The prediction of muscular load sharing and joint forces in the lower extremities during walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 1975. 8(2): p. 89–102.
Crowninshield, R.D. and R.A. Brand, A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. Journal of Biomechanics, 1981. 14(11): p. 793–801.
Patriarco, A.G., et al., An evaluation of the approaches of optimization models in the prediction of muscle forces during human gait. Journal of Biomechanics, 1981. 14(8): p. 513–525.
Anderson, F.C. and M.G. Pandy, Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. Journal of Biomechanics, 2001. 34(2): p. 153–161.
Delp, S.L., et al., OpenSim: Open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2007. 54(11): p. 1940–1950.
Riener, R., et al., Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: First experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2005. 13(3): p. 380–394.
Burgar, C.G., et al., Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2000. 37(6): p. 663–674.
Husemann, B., et al., Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke, 2007. 38(2): p. 349–354.
Cai, L.L., et al., Implications of assist-as-needed robotic step training after a complete spinal cord injury on intrinsic strategies of motor learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2006. 26(41): p. 10564–10568.
Jezernik, S., et al., Adaptive robotic rehabilitation of locomotion: A clinical study in spinally injured individuals. Spinal Cord, 2003. 41(12): p. 657–666.
Beyl, P., et al., Safe and compliant guidance by a powered knee exoskeleton for robot-assisted rehabilitation of gait. Advanced Robotics, 2011. 25(5): p. 513–535.
Kong, K., et al. Mechanical design and impedance compensation of SUBAR (Sogang University’s Biomedical Assist Robot). in IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, August 2–5, 2008. Xi’an, China: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Gupta, A., et al., Design, control and performance of rice wrist: A force feedback wrist exoskeleton for rehabilitation and training. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2008. 27(2): p. 233–251.
Erdemir, A., et al., Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clinical Biomechanics, 2007. 22(2): p. 131–154.
Liu, M.Q., et al., Muscle contributions to support and progression over a range of walking speeds. Journal of Biomechanics, 2008. 41(15): p. 3243–3252.
De Groote, F., et al., Sensitivity of dynamic simulations of gait and dynamometer experiments to hill muscle model parameters of knee flexors and extensors. Journal of biomechanics, 2010. 43(10): p. 1876–1883.
Ashworth, B., Preliminary trial of carisoprodal in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner, 1964. 192: p. 540–542.
Wang, Y., et al., Brain-computer interface based on the high-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential. Proceedings 1st International Conference on Neural Interface and Control Proceedings, 2005.
Manling, H., et al. Application and contrast in brain-computer interface between Hilbert-Huang transform and wavelet transform. in The 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists, 2008.
Materka, A., M. Byczuk, and P. Poryzala, A virtual keypad based on alternate half-field stimulated visual evoked potentials. Proceedings International Symposium on Information Technology Convergence, November 23–24, 2007. Jeon Ju, Korea. p. 296–300.
Diez, P., et al., Asynchronous BCI control using high-frequency SSVEP. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 2011. 8(1): p. 39.
Lynch, D.K. and B.H. Soffer, On the solar spectrum and the color sensitivity of the eye. Optics & Photonics News, 1999. 10(3): p. 28–30.
Ikegami, S., et al., Effect of the green/blue flicker matrix for P300-based brain-computer interface: An EEG-fMRI study. Frontiers in Neurology, 2012. 3(113): p. 1–10.
Soffer, B.H. and D.K. Lynch, Some paradoxes, errors, and resolutions concerning the spectral optimization of human vision. American Association of Physics Teachers, 1999. 67(11): p. 946–953.
Müller-Putz, G.R., et al., Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication: Impact of harmonic frequency components. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2005. 2(4): p. 123–130.
Bishop, C.M., Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. 1995, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Xie, S., Meng, W. (2017). Conclusions and Future Prospects. In: Xie, S., Meng, W. (eds) Biomechatronics in Medical Rehabilitation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52884-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52884-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52883-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52884-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)