Abstract
In clinical trials, randomization is used to allocate patients to treatment groups, because this design technique tends to produce comparability across treatment groups. However, even randomized clinical trials are still susceptible to bias. Bias is a systematic distortion of the treatment effect estimate. This chapter introduces two types of bias that may occur in clinical trials, selection bias and chronological bias. Selection bias may arise from predictability of the randomization sequence, and different models for predictability are presented. Chronological bias occurs due to unobserved time trends that influence patients’ responses, and its effect on the rejection rate of parametric hypothesis tests for the treatment effect will be revealed. It will be seen that different randomization procedures differ in their susceptibility to bias. A method to reduce bias at the design stage of the trial and robust testing strategies to adjust for bias at the analysis stage are presented to help to mitigate the potential for bias in randomized controlled clinical trials.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altman DG, Royston JP (1988) The hidden effect of time. Stat Med 7(6):629–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780070602
Armitage P (1982) The role of randomization in clinical trials. Stat Med 1:345–353
Atkinson AC (2014) Selecting a biased-coin design. Stat Sci 29(1):144–163. https://doi.org/10.1214/13-STS449
Berger VW (2005) Quantifying the magnitude of baseline covariate imbalances resulting from selection bias in randomized clinical trials. Biom J 47(2):119–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200410106
Berger VW, Exner DV (1999) Detecting selection bias in randomized clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 20(4):319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-2456(99)00014-8
Berger VW, Ivanova A, Deloria Knoll M (2003) Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures. Stat Med 22(19):3017–3028. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1538
Blackwell D, Hodges JL (1957) Design for the control of selection bias. Ann Math Statist 28(2):449–460. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706973
Efron B (1971) Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrika 58(3):403–417
Hilgers RD, Uschner D, Rosenberger WF, Heussen N (2017) ERDO – a framework to select an appropriate randomization procedure for clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 17(1):159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0428-z
ICH (1998) International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline: statistical principles for clinical trials E9
Ivanova A, Barrier RC Jr, Berger VW (2005) Adjusting for observable selection bias in block randomized trials. Stat Med 24(10):1537–1546. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2058
Kennes LN, Cramer E, Hilgers RD, Heussen N (2011) The impact of selection bias on test decisions in randomized clinical trials. Stat Med 30(21):2573–2581. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4279
Kennes LN, Rosenberger WF, Hilgers RD (2015) Inference for blocked randomization under a selection bias model. Biometrics 71(4):979–984. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12334
Langer S (2014) The modified distribution of the t-test statistic under the influence of selection bias based on random allocation rule. Master’s thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Germany
Matts JP, McHugh RB (1978) Analysis of accrual randomized clinical trials with balanced groups in strata. J Chronic Dis 31(12):725–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(78)90057-7
Mickenautsch S, Fu B, Gudehithlu S, Berger VW (2014) Accuracy of the Berger-Exner test for detecting third-order selection bias in randomised controlled trials: a simulation-based investigation. BMC Med Res Methodol 14(1):114. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-114
Proschan M (1994) Influence of selection bias on type i error rate under random permuted block designs. Stat Sin 4(1):219–231
Rosenberger W, Lachin J (2015) Randomization in clinical trials: theory and practice. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, Hoboken
Rückbeil MV, Hilgers RD, Heussen N (2017) Assessing the impact of selection bias on test decisions in trials with a time-to-event outcome. Stat Med 36(17):2656–2668
Ryeznik Y, Sverdlov O (2018) A comparative study of restricted randomization procedures for multi-arm trials with equal or unequal treatment allocation ratios. Stat Med 37(21):3056–3077. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7817
Salama I, Ivanova A, Qaqish B (2008) Efficient generation of constrained block allocation sequences. Stat Med 27(9):1421–1428. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3014. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sim.3014, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sim.3014
Tamm M, Hilgers RD (2014) Chronological bias in randomized clinical trials arising from different types of unobserved time trends. Methods Inf Med 53(6):501–510
Taves DR (2010) The use of minimization in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials 31(2):180–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2009.12.005
Uschner D, Hilgers RD, Heussen N (2018a) The impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials. PLoS One 13(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192065
Uschner D, Schindler D, Hilgers RD, Heussen N (2018b) randomizeR: an R package for the assessment and implementation of randomization in clinical trials. J Stat Softw 85(8):1–22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v085.i08
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Uschner, D., Rosenberger, W.F. (2022). Bias Control in Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. In: Piantadosi, S., Meinert, C.L. (eds) Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52636-2_219
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52636-2_219
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52635-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52636-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering