Abstract
The world is becoming linked more and more. A shift of researching focus can be observed recently, from “city as a system” to “systems of cities,” given the context of fast-changing communicating technologies such as high-speed railways (physical) as well as social media over the internet (nonphysical). Flows play essential roles for a city network, indicating the trends of position and functions within the network. In this study, we adopt new type of aggregated positioning data of massive internet users in China to explore the spatial patterns of cities during the Spring Festival in 2015. By introducing new clustering algorithm highlighting spatial constraints, models output hierarchic results with vary regional zones containing different number of cities. The higher layer of results with less members is not similar to the conventional delineation according to the conditions of physical and economic geography of China. Nevertheless, the very differences suggest hidden forces driving cities connected intensely across the administrative boundaries such as sharing mutual regional cultures or employment markets. These facts grounded for a general picture for the study on polycentric urban regions over the whole national territory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Batty, M. (2013). The new science of cities. London: Mit Press.
Brandes, U. (2001). A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2), 163–177.
Chi, G., et al. (2014). Uncovering regional characteristics from mobile phone data: A network science approach. Papers in Regional Science.
Daqing, L., et al. (2011). Dimension of spatially embedded networks. Nature Physics, 7(6), 481–484.
Diestel, R. (2005). Graph theory. Graduate texts in Mathematics 101.
Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Expert, P., et al. (2011). Uncovering space-independent communities in spatial networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(19), 7663–7668.
Feng, Z., et al. (2012). China’s city network characteristics based on social network space: An empirical of sina micro-blog. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(8), 1031–1043.
Guo, D. (2007). Visual analytics of spatial interaction patterns for pandemic decision support. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(8), 859–877.
Guo, D. (2009). Flow mapping and multivariate visualization of large spatial interaction data. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions, 15(6), 1041–1048.
Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California.
Lambiotte, R., et al. (2008). Laplacian dynamics and multiscale modular structure in networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.1770.
Li, D. (2015). Which Spring Festival migration data is better: A comparision, from http://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1321590
Liu, X., et al. (2015a). Understanding urban China with open data. Cities, 47, 53–61.
Liu, Y., et al. (2015b). Social sensing: A new approach to understanding our socioeconomic environments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(3), 512–530.
Mingfeng, W., & Yuemin, N. (2006). The network advantage of cities: An analysis of spatial structure and node accessibility of internet backbones in China. Geographical Research, 25(2), 193–203.
Newman, M. E. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577–8582.
Newman, M. E. (2008). The mathematics of networks. The New Palgrave Encyclopedia of Economics, 2(2008), 1–12.
Reichardt, J., & Bornholdt, S. (2006). Statistical mechanics of community detection. Physical Review E, 74(1), 016110.
Smith, D. A., & Timberlake, M. F. (2001). World City networks and hierarchies, 1977–1997 an empirical analysis of global air travel links. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1656–1678.
Taylor, P. J., Beaverstock, J. V., & Walker, D. R. F. (2000). Introducing GaWC: researching world city network formation. In S. Sassen (Ed.), Cities and their Cross-Border Networks. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Taylor, P. J., et al. (2010). External urban relational process: Introducing central flow theory to complement central place theory. Urban Studies, 47(13), 2803–2818.
Tencent. (2016). Product list of Tencent, from http://www.tencent.com/zh-cn/content/ir/fs/attachments/ProductlistofTencent.pdf
Wikipedia. (2016). Centrality, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrality
Yu, T., et al. (2008). China’s urban systems in terms of air passenger and cargo flows since 1995. Geographical Research, 27(6), 1407–1418.
Zhou, Y., & Hu, Z. (2002). Looking into the network structure of Chinese urban system from the perspective of air transportation. Geographical Research, 21(3), 276–286.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Dr. Xingjian Liu at Hong Kong University for his suggestive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, D., Wu, M., Duan, B., Cai, Y. (2018). Measuring by Movements: Hierarchical Clustering of Cities in China Based on Aggregated Massive Positioning Data. In: Shen, Z., Li, M. (eds) Big Data Support of Urban Planning and Management. Advances in Geographic Information Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51929-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51929-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51928-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51929-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)