Skip to main content

Dynamic Decision Making in Energy Systems with Storage and Renewable Energy Sources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Energy System Optimization

Part of the book series: Trends in Mathematics ((TM))

Abstract

We model an energy system with a storage device, a renewable energy source and with market access as a Markov decision process. We have identified four classes of pure policies (PFAs, CFAs, VFAs and lookaheads), each of which may work best depending on the characteristics of the system (volatility of prices, stationarity, accuracy of forecasts). We demonstrate that each of the four classes can work best on a particular instance of the problem. We describe the problem characteristics that bring out the best of each policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banos R, Manzano-Agugliaro F, Montoya F, Gil C, Alcayde A, Gomez J (2011) Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15(4):1753–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaudin M, Zareipour H, Schellenberglabe A, Rosehart W (2010) Energy storage for mitigating the variability of renewable electricity sources: An updated review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(4):302–314

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown PD, Lopes JAP, Matos MA (2008) Optimization of pumped storage capacity in an isolated power system with large renewable penetration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 23(2):523–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garca-Gonzalez J, Moraga Ruiz de la Muela R, Matres Santos L, Mateo Gonzalez A (2008) Stochastic joint optimization of wind generation and pumped-storage units in an electricity market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 23(2):460–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harsha P, Dahleh M (2015) Optimal management and sizing of energy storage under dynamic pricing for the efficient integration of renewable energy. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 30(3):1164–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kall P, Wallace S (1994) Stochastic programming. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JH, Powell W (2011) Optimal energy commitments with storage and intermittent supply. Operations Research 59(6):1347–1360

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lai G, Margot F, Secommandi N (2010) An approximate dynamic programming approach to benchmark practice-based heuristics for natural gas storage valuation. Operations Research 58(3):564–582

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Löhndorf N, Minner S (2010) Optimal day-ahead trading and storage of renewable energiesan approximate dynamic programming approach. Energy Systems 1(1):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Löhndorf N, Wozabal D, Minner S (2013) Optimizing trading decisions for hydro storage systems using approximate dual dynamic programming. Operations Research 61(4):810–823

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lund PD, Lindgren J, Mikkola J, Salpakari J (2015) Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 45(C):785–807

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meisel S (2011) Anticipatory Optimization for Dynamic Decision Making, Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 51. Springer New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Powell W (2011) Approximate Dynamic Programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Powell W, Meisel S (2016) Tutorial on stochastic optimization in energy I: Modeling and policies. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 31(2):1459–1467

    Google Scholar 

  15. Powell W, Meisel S (2016) Tutorial on stochastic optimization in energy II: An energy storage illustration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 31(2):1468–1475

    Google Scholar 

  16. Puterman M (2005) Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Salas D, Powell W (2015) Benchmarking a scalable approximate dynamic programming algorithm for stochastic control of multidimensional energy storage problems. Tech. rep., Department of Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Princeton University

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xi X, Sioshansi R (2014) A stochastic dynamic programming model for co-optimization of distributed energy storage. Energy Systems 5(3):474–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of the first author was supported by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Meisel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meisel, S., Powell, W.B. (2017). Dynamic Decision Making in Energy Systems with Storage and Renewable Energy Sources. In: Bertsch, V., Fichtner, W., Heuveline, V., Leibfried, T. (eds) Advances in Energy System Optimization. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51795-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics